腹腔镜胆囊切除术后镇痛:布比卡因滴注、浸润与曲马多非肠外镇痛的比较研究。

S. Shabir, B. Saleem, Abdul Hakim, A. Hashia
{"title":"腹腔镜胆囊切除术后镇痛:布比卡因滴注、浸润与曲马多非肠外镇痛的比较研究。","authors":"S. Shabir, B. Saleem, Abdul Hakim, A. Hashia","doi":"10.5580/1315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a prospective randomized double blind clinical study, 120 patients of either sex in the age group of 25-65 years with ASA I and II, who were scheduled to undergo elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were allocated to two groups of 60 patients each with regard to postoperative analgesia. In Group-I (n=60) the patients received Bupivacaine (0.5%) 20ml, instilled in gallbladder bed and the undersurface of diaphragm and infiltration of port wounds. In Group-II (n=60) the patients were provided with postoperative analgesia with Tramadol (100mg) given intramuscularly (IM) at the completion of procedure. The postoperative analgesia was assessed using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at hourly intervals for first four hours and then 24 hours also. Vital signs like Spo2, HR, NIBP, RR were recorded six hourly for 24 hours postoperatively. There was statistically significant (p value<0.05) better analgesia in Group-II (Tramadol group) as compared to Group-I (Bupivacaine group).","PeriodicalId":396781,"journal":{"name":"The Internet Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":"305 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Postoperative Analgesia In Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Comparative Study Using Bupivacaine Instillation And Infiltration Versus Parenteral Analgesia (Tramadol).\",\"authors\":\"S. Shabir, B. Saleem, Abdul Hakim, A. Hashia\",\"doi\":\"10.5580/1315\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In a prospective randomized double blind clinical study, 120 patients of either sex in the age group of 25-65 years with ASA I and II, who were scheduled to undergo elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were allocated to two groups of 60 patients each with regard to postoperative analgesia. In Group-I (n=60) the patients received Bupivacaine (0.5%) 20ml, instilled in gallbladder bed and the undersurface of diaphragm and infiltration of port wounds. In Group-II (n=60) the patients were provided with postoperative analgesia with Tramadol (100mg) given intramuscularly (IM) at the completion of procedure. The postoperative analgesia was assessed using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at hourly intervals for first four hours and then 24 hours also. Vital signs like Spo2, HR, NIBP, RR were recorded six hourly for 24 hours postoperatively. There was statistically significant (p value<0.05) better analgesia in Group-II (Tramadol group) as compared to Group-I (Bupivacaine group).\",\"PeriodicalId\":396781,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Internet Journal of Anesthesiology\",\"volume\":\"305 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Internet Journal of Anesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5580/1315\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Internet Journal of Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5580/1315","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

在一项前瞻性随机双盲临床研究中,120例年龄在25-65岁的ASA I和II型患者,男女皆可,计划行选择性腹腔镜胆囊切除术,根据术后镇痛分为两组,每组60例。第一组(n=60)给予布比卡因(0.5%)20ml,灌注于胆囊床和膈下表面,并浸润于左端创面。ii组(n=60)患者术后给予曲马多(100mg)肌注镇痛。采用视觉模拟评分法(Visual Analogue Scale, VAS)每小时评价术后4 h和24 h的镇痛效果。术后24小时6 h记录Spo2、HR、NIBP、RR等生命体征。组(曲马多组)镇痛效果优于组(布比卡因组),差异有统计学意义(p值<0.05)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Postoperative Analgesia In Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Comparative Study Using Bupivacaine Instillation And Infiltration Versus Parenteral Analgesia (Tramadol).
In a prospective randomized double blind clinical study, 120 patients of either sex in the age group of 25-65 years with ASA I and II, who were scheduled to undergo elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were allocated to two groups of 60 patients each with regard to postoperative analgesia. In Group-I (n=60) the patients received Bupivacaine (0.5%) 20ml, instilled in gallbladder bed and the undersurface of diaphragm and infiltration of port wounds. In Group-II (n=60) the patients were provided with postoperative analgesia with Tramadol (100mg) given intramuscularly (IM) at the completion of procedure. The postoperative analgesia was assessed using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at hourly intervals for first four hours and then 24 hours also. Vital signs like Spo2, HR, NIBP, RR were recorded six hourly for 24 hours postoperatively. There was statistically significant (p value<0.05) better analgesia in Group-II (Tramadol group) as compared to Group-I (Bupivacaine group).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Inferior Alveolar Nerve Injury With Laryngeal Mask Airway Unusual Oral Cavity Metastasis From Follicular Carcinoma Of The Thyroid – A Case Report Efficacy of Ephedrine Versus Lignocaine Pretreatment In Preventing Pain Following Propofol Injection: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study. Cesarean Section of a 25 3/7 Week Parturient with Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva: A Case Report Magill Forceps- An Aid For Difficult Intubation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1