推文的讽刺检测:一个比较研究

Tanya Jain, Nilesh Agrawal, Garima Goyal, Niyati Aggrawal
{"title":"推文的讽刺检测:一个比较研究","authors":"Tanya Jain, Nilesh Agrawal, Garima Goyal, Niyati Aggrawal","doi":"10.1109/IC3.2017.8284317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sarcasm is a nuanced form of communication where the individual states opposite of what is implied. One of the major challenges of sarcasm detection is its ambiguous nature. There is no prescribed definition of sarcasm. Another major challenge is the growing size of the languages. Every day hundreds of new slang words are being created and used on these sites. Hence, the existing corpus of positive and negative sentiments may not prove to be accurate in detecting sarcasm. Also, the recent developments in online social networks allow its users to use varied kind of emoticons with the text. These emoticons may change the polarity of the text and make it sarcastic. Due to these difficulties and the inherently tricky nature of sarcasm it is generally ignored during social network analysis. As a result the results of such analysis are affected adversely. Thus, sarcasm detection poses to be one of the most critical problems which we need to overcome. Detection of sarcastic content is vital to various NLP based systems such as text summarization and sentiment analysis. In this paper we address the problem of sarcasm detection by leveraging the most common expression of sarcasm — “positive sentiment attached to a negative situation”. Our work uses two ensemble based approaches — voted ensemble classifier and random forest classifier. Unlike current approaches to sarcasm detection which rely on existing corpus of positive and negative sentiments for training the classifiers, we use a seeding algorithm to generate training corpus. The proposed model also uses a pragmatic classifier to detect emoticon based sarcasm.","PeriodicalId":147099,"journal":{"name":"2017 Tenth International Conference on Contemporary Computing (IC3)","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sarcasm detection of tweets: A comparative study\",\"authors\":\"Tanya Jain, Nilesh Agrawal, Garima Goyal, Niyati Aggrawal\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IC3.2017.8284317\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Sarcasm is a nuanced form of communication where the individual states opposite of what is implied. One of the major challenges of sarcasm detection is its ambiguous nature. There is no prescribed definition of sarcasm. Another major challenge is the growing size of the languages. Every day hundreds of new slang words are being created and used on these sites. Hence, the existing corpus of positive and negative sentiments may not prove to be accurate in detecting sarcasm. Also, the recent developments in online social networks allow its users to use varied kind of emoticons with the text. These emoticons may change the polarity of the text and make it sarcastic. Due to these difficulties and the inherently tricky nature of sarcasm it is generally ignored during social network analysis. As a result the results of such analysis are affected adversely. Thus, sarcasm detection poses to be one of the most critical problems which we need to overcome. Detection of sarcastic content is vital to various NLP based systems such as text summarization and sentiment analysis. In this paper we address the problem of sarcasm detection by leveraging the most common expression of sarcasm — “positive sentiment attached to a negative situation”. Our work uses two ensemble based approaches — voted ensemble classifier and random forest classifier. Unlike current approaches to sarcasm detection which rely on existing corpus of positive and negative sentiments for training the classifiers, we use a seeding algorithm to generate training corpus. The proposed model also uses a pragmatic classifier to detect emoticon based sarcasm.\",\"PeriodicalId\":147099,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 Tenth International Conference on Contemporary Computing (IC3)\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"20\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 Tenth International Conference on Contemporary Computing (IC3)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IC3.2017.8284317\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 Tenth International Conference on Contemporary Computing (IC3)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IC3.2017.8284317","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

摘要

讽刺是一种微妙的交流方式,个人表达与所暗示的相反的东西。讽刺检测的主要挑战之一是它的模糊性。讽刺没有固定的定义。另一个主要挑战是不断增长的语言规模。每天都有数百个新的俚语在这些网站上被创造和使用。因此,现有的积极和消极情绪语料库可能无法准确地检测讽刺。此外,在线社交网络的最新发展允许其用户在文本中使用各种表情符号。这些表情符号可能会改变文本的极性,使其具有讽刺意味。由于这些困难和讽刺固有的棘手性质,它通常在社会网络分析中被忽略。因此,这种分析的结果受到不利影响。因此,讽刺检测是我们需要克服的最关键的问题之一。讽刺内容的检测对于文本摘要和情感分析等基于NLP的系统至关重要。在本文中,我们通过利用讽刺最常见的表达——“积极的情绪附着在消极的情况下”来解决讽刺检测的问题。我们的工作使用了两种基于集成的方法——投票集成分类器和随机森林分类器。与现有的讽刺检测方法依赖于现有的积极和消极情绪语料库来训练分类器不同,我们使用种子算法来生成训练语料库。该模型还使用了一个语用分类器来检测基于表情符号的讽刺。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sarcasm detection of tweets: A comparative study
Sarcasm is a nuanced form of communication where the individual states opposite of what is implied. One of the major challenges of sarcasm detection is its ambiguous nature. There is no prescribed definition of sarcasm. Another major challenge is the growing size of the languages. Every day hundreds of new slang words are being created and used on these sites. Hence, the existing corpus of positive and negative sentiments may not prove to be accurate in detecting sarcasm. Also, the recent developments in online social networks allow its users to use varied kind of emoticons with the text. These emoticons may change the polarity of the text and make it sarcastic. Due to these difficulties and the inherently tricky nature of sarcasm it is generally ignored during social network analysis. As a result the results of such analysis are affected adversely. Thus, sarcasm detection poses to be one of the most critical problems which we need to overcome. Detection of sarcastic content is vital to various NLP based systems such as text summarization and sentiment analysis. In this paper we address the problem of sarcasm detection by leveraging the most common expression of sarcasm — “positive sentiment attached to a negative situation”. Our work uses two ensemble based approaches — voted ensemble classifier and random forest classifier. Unlike current approaches to sarcasm detection which rely on existing corpus of positive and negative sentiments for training the classifiers, we use a seeding algorithm to generate training corpus. The proposed model also uses a pragmatic classifier to detect emoticon based sarcasm.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Clickstream & behavioral analysis with context awareness for e-commercial applications Clustering based minimum spanning tree algorithm Sarcasm detection of tweets: A comparative study Quantum genetic algorithm with rotation angle refinement for dependent task scheduling on distributed systems An approach to maintain attendance using image processing techniques
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1