背景、权力和多样性观念:英国和南非员工的比较

Anita Maharaj, Doyin Atewologun
{"title":"背景、权力和多样性观念:英国和南非员工的比较","authors":"Anita Maharaj, Doyin Atewologun","doi":"10.25159/2664-3731/7541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This quantitative study explored group differences in organisational commitment and fairness perceptions across two national contexts. Integrating the social identity and intergroup theories, we analysed categories in relation to proposed differences in power relations in South Africa in a private organisation with over 30 000 employees and the United Kingdom in a public organisation with 10 000 employees. In both countries, White men perceived the organisation as most fair. Black men in South Africa and Black women in the United Kingdom perceived the organisation as least fair. A positive and significant relationship between commitment and organisational fairness for all ethnic-gender groups in both countries were found except for White men in the United Kingdom. In South Africa, White men were significantly more committed to the organisation than White men in the United Kingdom. We categorised groups on the basis of intersecting identities and power relations that are meaningful in a specific context to understand personal or organisational diversity attitudes and outcomes. Our approach offers a new avenue for meaningful examination of diversity outcomes in organisations. Our findings suggest that organisations should not only employ fair and inclusive organisational policies but may also need to differentially manage diversity perceptions for different ethnic-gender groups.","PeriodicalId":143111,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Employee Relations","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Context, Power and Diversity Perceptions: A Comparison of UK and South African Employees\",\"authors\":\"Anita Maharaj, Doyin Atewologun\",\"doi\":\"10.25159/2664-3731/7541\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This quantitative study explored group differences in organisational commitment and fairness perceptions across two national contexts. Integrating the social identity and intergroup theories, we analysed categories in relation to proposed differences in power relations in South Africa in a private organisation with over 30 000 employees and the United Kingdom in a public organisation with 10 000 employees. In both countries, White men perceived the organisation as most fair. Black men in South Africa and Black women in the United Kingdom perceived the organisation as least fair. A positive and significant relationship between commitment and organisational fairness for all ethnic-gender groups in both countries were found except for White men in the United Kingdom. In South Africa, White men were significantly more committed to the organisation than White men in the United Kingdom. We categorised groups on the basis of intersecting identities and power relations that are meaningful in a specific context to understand personal or organisational diversity attitudes and outcomes. Our approach offers a new avenue for meaningful examination of diversity outcomes in organisations. Our findings suggest that organisations should not only employ fair and inclusive organisational policies but may also need to differentially manage diversity perceptions for different ethnic-gender groups.\",\"PeriodicalId\":143111,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"African Journal of Employee Relations\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"African Journal of Employee Relations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25159/2664-3731/7541\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Employee Relations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25159/2664-3731/7541","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本定量研究探讨了两国在组织承诺和公平观念方面的群体差异。结合社会认同和群体间理论,我们分析了南非一个拥有超过3万名员工的私人组织和英国一个拥有1万名员工的公共组织中权力关系差异的类别。在这两个国家,白人男性都认为这个组织是最公平的。南非的黑人男性和英国的黑人女性认为该组织最不公平。除了英国的白人男性外,两国所有种族-性别群体的承诺与组织公平之间都存在显著的正相关关系。在南非,白人男性明显比英国的白人男性更忠于组织。我们根据在特定背景下有意义的交叉身份和权力关系对群体进行分类,以理解个人或组织的多样性态度和结果。我们的方法为有意义地检查组织中的多样性结果提供了新的途径。我们的研究结果表明,组织不仅应该采用公平和包容性的组织政策,还可能需要对不同种族和性别群体的多样性观念进行不同的管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Context, Power and Diversity Perceptions: A Comparison of UK and South African Employees
This quantitative study explored group differences in organisational commitment and fairness perceptions across two national contexts. Integrating the social identity and intergroup theories, we analysed categories in relation to proposed differences in power relations in South Africa in a private organisation with over 30 000 employees and the United Kingdom in a public organisation with 10 000 employees. In both countries, White men perceived the organisation as most fair. Black men in South Africa and Black women in the United Kingdom perceived the organisation as least fair. A positive and significant relationship between commitment and organisational fairness for all ethnic-gender groups in both countries were found except for White men in the United Kingdom. In South Africa, White men were significantly more committed to the organisation than White men in the United Kingdom. We categorised groups on the basis of intersecting identities and power relations that are meaningful in a specific context to understand personal or organisational diversity attitudes and outcomes. Our approach offers a new avenue for meaningful examination of diversity outcomes in organisations. Our findings suggest that organisations should not only employ fair and inclusive organisational policies but may also need to differentially manage diversity perceptions for different ethnic-gender groups.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
South African Industry and Geographic Dynamics Perspective on the Link Between Employee Diversity Attributes and Employee Productivity Investigating the Prevalence of Gender Stereotypes in a South African Mine Job Satisfaction in South Africa: The Quest for Job Quality Psychological Contracts and Employee Voice: Does Breach Matter? The Rise of Public Sector Employee Strikes in Africa: Should We Be worried?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1