{"title":"用FIT4Apps指导移动应用程序的质量保证——两步评估","authors":"Konstantin Holl, Frank Elberzhager","doi":"10.1109/SEAA.2017.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The quality of mobile applications is one essential factor for their success because users often immediately discard applications with insufficient quality. In prior contributions, we presented FIT4Apps, a quality assurance method for mobile applications, which focuses inspections and tests on the development of mobile applications. We performed a two-step empirical evaluation of this method: a controlled experiment and a case study, which was performed as a post-mortem analysis. The empirical evaluation showed the applicability of FIT4Apps and demonstrated that it finds, respectively prevents, at least 75% more mobile-specific failures during development compared to state-of-the-practice approaches. This comprises failures revealed by testing or prevented by revealed requirements defects and leads to at least 85% less mobile-specific failures after the release of the mobile application. In our setting, the effort for applying FIT4Apps is less than 1% of the overall development effort for an iteration and may even save effort considering the benefits of earlier findings.","PeriodicalId":151513,"journal":{"name":"2017 43rd Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA)","volume":"85 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Guiding Quality Assurance for Mobile Applications with FIT4Apps — A Two-Step Evaluation\",\"authors\":\"Konstantin Holl, Frank Elberzhager\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SEAA.2017.12\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The quality of mobile applications is one essential factor for their success because users often immediately discard applications with insufficient quality. In prior contributions, we presented FIT4Apps, a quality assurance method for mobile applications, which focuses inspections and tests on the development of mobile applications. We performed a two-step empirical evaluation of this method: a controlled experiment and a case study, which was performed as a post-mortem analysis. The empirical evaluation showed the applicability of FIT4Apps and demonstrated that it finds, respectively prevents, at least 75% more mobile-specific failures during development compared to state-of-the-practice approaches. This comprises failures revealed by testing or prevented by revealed requirements defects and leads to at least 85% less mobile-specific failures after the release of the mobile application. In our setting, the effort for applying FIT4Apps is less than 1% of the overall development effort for an iteration and may even save effort considering the benefits of earlier findings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":151513,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 43rd Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA)\",\"volume\":\"85 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 43rd Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SEAA.2017.12\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 43rd Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SEAA.2017.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Guiding Quality Assurance for Mobile Applications with FIT4Apps — A Two-Step Evaluation
The quality of mobile applications is one essential factor for their success because users often immediately discard applications with insufficient quality. In prior contributions, we presented FIT4Apps, a quality assurance method for mobile applications, which focuses inspections and tests on the development of mobile applications. We performed a two-step empirical evaluation of this method: a controlled experiment and a case study, which was performed as a post-mortem analysis. The empirical evaluation showed the applicability of FIT4Apps and demonstrated that it finds, respectively prevents, at least 75% more mobile-specific failures during development compared to state-of-the-practice approaches. This comprises failures revealed by testing or prevented by revealed requirements defects and leads to at least 85% less mobile-specific failures after the release of the mobile application. In our setting, the effort for applying FIT4Apps is less than 1% of the overall development effort for an iteration and may even save effort considering the benefits of earlier findings.