Emilio Delgado López-Cózar, E. Orduña-Malea, Alberto Martín-Martín
{"title":"作为研究评估的数据来源","authors":"Emilio Delgado López-Cózar, E. Orduña-Malea, Alberto Martín-Martín","doi":"10.31235/osf.io/pqr53","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The launch of Google Scholar (GS) marked the beginning of a revolution in the scientific information market. This search engine, unlike traditional databases, automatically indexes information from the academic web. Its ease of use, together with its wide coverage and fast indexing speed, have made it the first tool most scientists currently turn to when they need to carry out a literature search. Additionally, the fact that its search results were accompanied from the beginning by citation counts, as well as the later development of secondary products which leverage this citation data (such as Google Scholar Metrics and Google Scholar Citations), made many scientists wonder about its potential as a source of data for bibliometric analyses. The goal of this chapter is to lay the foundations for the use of GS as a supplementary source (and in some disciplines, arguably the best alternative) for scientific evaluation. First, we present a general overview of how GS works. Second, we present empirical evidences about its main characteristics (size, coverage, and growth rate). Third, we carry out a systematic analysis of the main limitations this search engine presents as a tool for the evaluation of scientific performance. Lastly, we discuss the main differences between GS and other more traditional bibliographic databases in light of the correlations found between their citation data. We conclude that Google Scholar presents a broader view of the academic world because it has brought to light a great amount of sources that were not previously visible.","PeriodicalId":393794,"journal":{"name":"Springer Handbook of Science and Technology Indicators","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"77","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Google Scholar as a data source for research assessment\",\"authors\":\"Emilio Delgado López-Cózar, E. Orduña-Malea, Alberto Martín-Martín\",\"doi\":\"10.31235/osf.io/pqr53\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The launch of Google Scholar (GS) marked the beginning of a revolution in the scientific information market. This search engine, unlike traditional databases, automatically indexes information from the academic web. Its ease of use, together with its wide coverage and fast indexing speed, have made it the first tool most scientists currently turn to when they need to carry out a literature search. Additionally, the fact that its search results were accompanied from the beginning by citation counts, as well as the later development of secondary products which leverage this citation data (such as Google Scholar Metrics and Google Scholar Citations), made many scientists wonder about its potential as a source of data for bibliometric analyses. The goal of this chapter is to lay the foundations for the use of GS as a supplementary source (and in some disciplines, arguably the best alternative) for scientific evaluation. First, we present a general overview of how GS works. Second, we present empirical evidences about its main characteristics (size, coverage, and growth rate). Third, we carry out a systematic analysis of the main limitations this search engine presents as a tool for the evaluation of scientific performance. Lastly, we discuss the main differences between GS and other more traditional bibliographic databases in light of the correlations found between their citation data. We conclude that Google Scholar presents a broader view of the academic world because it has brought to light a great amount of sources that were not previously visible.\",\"PeriodicalId\":393794,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Springer Handbook of Science and Technology Indicators\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"77\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Springer Handbook of Science and Technology Indicators\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/pqr53\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Springer Handbook of Science and Technology Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/pqr53","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 77
摘要
Google Scholar的推出标志着科学信息市场一场革命的开始。与传统的数据库不同,这个搜索引擎可以自动索引来自学术网络的信息。它的易用性,加上其广泛的覆盖范围和快速的索引速度,使它成为大多数科学家目前需要进行文献搜索时的首选工具。此外,它的搜索结果从一开始就伴随着引文计数,以及后来开发的利用这些引文数据的二级产品(如Google Scholar Metrics和Google Scholar citation),使许多科学家怀疑它作为文献计量分析数据来源的潜力。本章的目标是为使用GS作为科学评估的补充来源(在某些学科中,可以说是最好的替代来源)奠定基础。首先,我们概述一下GS的工作原理。其次,我们对其主要特征(规模、覆盖率和增长率)进行了实证分析。第三,我们对该搜索引擎作为科学绩效评估工具的主要局限性进行了系统的分析。最后,根据引文数据之间的相关性,我们讨论了GS与其他传统书目数据库之间的主要区别。我们得出的结论是,谷歌学术展示了一个更广阔的学术世界,因为它揭示了大量以前不可见的资源。
Google Scholar as a data source for research assessment
The launch of Google Scholar (GS) marked the beginning of a revolution in the scientific information market. This search engine, unlike traditional databases, automatically indexes information from the academic web. Its ease of use, together with its wide coverage and fast indexing speed, have made it the first tool most scientists currently turn to when they need to carry out a literature search. Additionally, the fact that its search results were accompanied from the beginning by citation counts, as well as the later development of secondary products which leverage this citation data (such as Google Scholar Metrics and Google Scholar Citations), made many scientists wonder about its potential as a source of data for bibliometric analyses. The goal of this chapter is to lay the foundations for the use of GS as a supplementary source (and in some disciplines, arguably the best alternative) for scientific evaluation. First, we present a general overview of how GS works. Second, we present empirical evidences about its main characteristics (size, coverage, and growth rate). Third, we carry out a systematic analysis of the main limitations this search engine presents as a tool for the evaluation of scientific performance. Lastly, we discuss the main differences between GS and other more traditional bibliographic databases in light of the correlations found between their citation data. We conclude that Google Scholar presents a broader view of the academic world because it has brought to light a great amount of sources that were not previously visible.