迈向更强的计算通讯科学理论基础

A. Waldherr, Stephanie Geise, Merja Mahrt, Christian Katzenbach, Christian Nuernbergk
{"title":"迈向更强的计算通讯科学理论基础","authors":"A. Waldherr, Stephanie Geise, Merja Mahrt, Christian Katzenbach, Christian Nuernbergk","doi":"10.5117/ccr2021.02.002.wald","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Computational communication science (CCS) is embraced by many as a fruitful methodological approach to studying communication in the digital era. However, theoretical advances have not been considered equally important in CCS. Specifically, we observe an emphasis on mid-range and micro theories that misses a larger discussion on how macro-theoretical frameworks can serve CCS scholarship. With this article, we aim to stimulate such a discussion. Although macro frameworks might not point directly to specific questions and hypotheses, they shape our research through influencing which kinds of questions we ask, which kinds of hypotheses we formulate, and which methods we find adequate and useful. We showcase how three selected theoretical frameworks might advance CCS scholarship in this way: (1) complexity theory, (2) theories of the public sphere, and (3) mediatization theory. Using online protest as an example, we discuss how the focus (and the blind spots) of our research designs shifts with each framework.","PeriodicalId":275035,"journal":{"name":"Computational Communication Research","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Toward a Stronger Theoretical Grounding of Computational Communication Science\",\"authors\":\"A. Waldherr, Stephanie Geise, Merja Mahrt, Christian Katzenbach, Christian Nuernbergk\",\"doi\":\"10.5117/ccr2021.02.002.wald\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Computational communication science (CCS) is embraced by many as a fruitful methodological approach to studying communication in the digital era. However, theoretical advances have not been considered equally important in CCS. Specifically, we observe an emphasis on mid-range and micro theories that misses a larger discussion on how macro-theoretical frameworks can serve CCS scholarship. With this article, we aim to stimulate such a discussion. Although macro frameworks might not point directly to specific questions and hypotheses, they shape our research through influencing which kinds of questions we ask, which kinds of hypotheses we formulate, and which methods we find adequate and useful. We showcase how three selected theoretical frameworks might advance CCS scholarship in this way: (1) complexity theory, (2) theories of the public sphere, and (3) mediatization theory. Using online protest as an example, we discuss how the focus (and the blind spots) of our research designs shifts with each framework.\",\"PeriodicalId\":275035,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computational Communication Research\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computational Communication Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5117/ccr2021.02.002.wald\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computational Communication Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5117/ccr2021.02.002.wald","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

计算通信科学(CCS)被许多人认为是研究数字时代通信的一种卓有成效的方法。然而,在CCS中,理论的进步并没有被认为同等重要。具体来说,我们观察到对中程和微观理论的强调,忽略了宏观理论框架如何为CCS奖学金服务的更大讨论。在本文中,我们旨在激发这样的讨论。尽管宏观框架可能不会直接指向具体的问题和假设,但它们通过影响我们提出的问题、提出的假设以及我们认为适当和有用的方法来塑造我们的研究。我们展示了三个选定的理论框架如何以这种方式推进CCS学术:(1)复杂性理论,(2)公共领域理论,(3)媒介化理论。以在线抗议为例,我们讨论了我们的研究设计的焦点(和盲点)如何随着每个框架的变化而变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Toward a Stronger Theoretical Grounding of Computational Communication Science
Computational communication science (CCS) is embraced by many as a fruitful methodological approach to studying communication in the digital era. However, theoretical advances have not been considered equally important in CCS. Specifically, we observe an emphasis on mid-range and micro theories that misses a larger discussion on how macro-theoretical frameworks can serve CCS scholarship. With this article, we aim to stimulate such a discussion. Although macro frameworks might not point directly to specific questions and hypotheses, they shape our research through influencing which kinds of questions we ask, which kinds of hypotheses we formulate, and which methods we find adequate and useful. We showcase how three selected theoretical frameworks might advance CCS scholarship in this way: (1) complexity theory, (2) theories of the public sphere, and (3) mediatization theory. Using online protest as an example, we discuss how the focus (and the blind spots) of our research designs shifts with each framework.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Using State-of-the-art Emotion Detection Models in a Crisis Communication Context How COVID-19 and the News Shaped Populism in Facebook Comments in Seven European Countries. : A Computational Analysis. Agent-based modeling of diversity, new information and minority groups in opinion formation Going Micro to Go Negative? Algorithmic Recommendations’ Role for the Interrelatedness of Counter-Messages and Polluted Content on YouTube – A Network Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1