药物依从性对稳定型冠状动脉疾病门诊患者心血管事件风险的影响:两年监测结果

S. Fitilev, A. Vozzhaev, L. N. Saakova, I. B. Bondareva, D. Kliuev, I. I. Shkrebniova
{"title":"药物依从性对稳定型冠状动脉疾病门诊患者心血管事件风险的影响:两年监测结果","authors":"S. Fitilev, A. Vozzhaev, L. N. Saakova, I. B. Bondareva, D. Kliuev, I. I. Shkrebniova","doi":"10.37489/2588-0519-2023-1-26-33","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. Incidence of inadequate medication adherence to secondary prevention medications among Russian coronary patients is around 50 %, but the question, how this might influence on the risk of unfavorable outcomes, still has no answer.Aim. To determine the effect of medication adherence on the risk of unfavorable clinical outcomes in outpatients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD). Methods. Prospective observational cohort study was conducted. 281 subjects with verified stable CAD were included in line with the pre-specified criteria. Medication adherence was measured by validated 8-item Morisky scale. Data on cardiovascular events were obtained over the 24-month monitoring period. Study endpoint was a composite cardiovascular event (all-cause mortality, acute myocardial infarction, unstable angina, revascularization surgery, acute heart failure, decompensation of chronic heart failure). Survival analysis by Kaplan — Meier method was performed.Results. 26.0 % of coronary outpatients had low medication adherence (below 6 points by Morisky scale). Groups of patients with satisfactory and low medication adherence were comparable by demography, medical history, and pharmacotherapy. Over the monitoring period composite cardiovascular event was registered in 115 patients (40.9 %). 46.6 % of patients from the low adherence group suffered from the composite event, 38.9 % — from the satisfactory adherence group. Time to the event was lower in the low adherence group — median 24.2 (IQR 7.5-29.2) vs. median 27.9 (IQR 17.4-34.5) months. Cumulative incidence of the composite cardiovascular event over the monitoring period was higher in the low adherence group compared to satisfactory adherence group (p=0.032; log-rank test), also when adjusted for history of cardiovascular events (p=0.033; log-rank test). Satisfactory medication adherence reduced risk of composite cardiovascular event by 37 % (HR 0.63; 95 % CI 0.42-0.94; р=0.025; Cox-regression adjusted for history of cardiovascular events).Conclusion. Coronary outpatients with satisfactory medication adherence had lower risk of cardiovascular events over the 24-month monitoring period. ","PeriodicalId":326764,"journal":{"name":"Kachestvennaya Klinicheskaya Praktika = Good Clinical Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of medication adherence on the risk of cardiovascular events in outpatients with stable coronary artery disease: results of two-year monitoring\",\"authors\":\"S. Fitilev, A. Vozzhaev, L. N. Saakova, I. B. Bondareva, D. Kliuev, I. I. Shkrebniova\",\"doi\":\"10.37489/2588-0519-2023-1-26-33\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction. Incidence of inadequate medication adherence to secondary prevention medications among Russian coronary patients is around 50 %, but the question, how this might influence on the risk of unfavorable outcomes, still has no answer.Aim. To determine the effect of medication adherence on the risk of unfavorable clinical outcomes in outpatients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD). Methods. Prospective observational cohort study was conducted. 281 subjects with verified stable CAD were included in line with the pre-specified criteria. Medication adherence was measured by validated 8-item Morisky scale. Data on cardiovascular events were obtained over the 24-month monitoring period. Study endpoint was a composite cardiovascular event (all-cause mortality, acute myocardial infarction, unstable angina, revascularization surgery, acute heart failure, decompensation of chronic heart failure). Survival analysis by Kaplan — Meier method was performed.Results. 26.0 % of coronary outpatients had low medication adherence (below 6 points by Morisky scale). Groups of patients with satisfactory and low medication adherence were comparable by demography, medical history, and pharmacotherapy. Over the monitoring period composite cardiovascular event was registered in 115 patients (40.9 %). 46.6 % of patients from the low adherence group suffered from the composite event, 38.9 % — from the satisfactory adherence group. Time to the event was lower in the low adherence group — median 24.2 (IQR 7.5-29.2) vs. median 27.9 (IQR 17.4-34.5) months. Cumulative incidence of the composite cardiovascular event over the monitoring period was higher in the low adherence group compared to satisfactory adherence group (p=0.032; log-rank test), also when adjusted for history of cardiovascular events (p=0.033; log-rank test). Satisfactory medication adherence reduced risk of composite cardiovascular event by 37 % (HR 0.63; 95 % CI 0.42-0.94; р=0.025; Cox-regression adjusted for history of cardiovascular events).Conclusion. Coronary outpatients with satisfactory medication adherence had lower risk of cardiovascular events over the 24-month monitoring period. \",\"PeriodicalId\":326764,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kachestvennaya Klinicheskaya Praktika = Good Clinical Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kachestvennaya Klinicheskaya Praktika = Good Clinical Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37489/2588-0519-2023-1-26-33\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kachestvennaya Klinicheskaya Praktika = Good Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37489/2588-0519-2023-1-26-33","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

介绍。俄罗斯冠状动脉患者中二级预防药物依从性不足的发生率约为50%,但这如何影响不良结局的风险仍然没有答案。确定药物依从性对稳定型冠心病(CAD)门诊患者不良临床结局风险的影响。方法。进行前瞻性观察队列研究。281例经证实稳定的CAD受试者符合预先规定的标准。采用经验证的8项Morisky量表测量药物依从性。在24个月的监测期间获得心血管事件的数据。研究终点为复合心血管事件(全因死亡率、急性心肌梗死、不稳定型心绞痛、血运重建手术、急性心力衰竭、慢性心力衰竭失代偿)。Kaplan - Meier法进行生存分析。26.0%的冠心病门诊患者药物依从性较低(Morisky评分低于6分)。在人口统计学、病史和药物治疗方面,满意和低药物依从性的患者组具有可比性。在监测期间,有115例(40.9%)患者发生复合心血管事件。低依从性组46.6%的患者出现复合事件,满意依从性组38.9%。低依从性组的事件发生时间较短,中位为24.2个月(IQR为7.5-29.2),中位为27.9个月(IQR为17.4-34.5)。在监测期间,低依从组的复合心血管事件累积发生率高于满意依从组(p=0.032;Log-rank检验),校正心血管事件史后也是如此(p=0.033;生存率较)。满意的药物依从性使复合心血管事件的风险降低37% (HR 0.63;95% ci 0.42-0.94;р= 0.025;cox回归校正心血管事件史)。在24个月的监测期内,依从性良好的冠状动脉门诊患者发生心血管事件的风险较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of medication adherence on the risk of cardiovascular events in outpatients with stable coronary artery disease: results of two-year monitoring
Introduction. Incidence of inadequate medication adherence to secondary prevention medications among Russian coronary patients is around 50 %, but the question, how this might influence on the risk of unfavorable outcomes, still has no answer.Aim. To determine the effect of medication adherence on the risk of unfavorable clinical outcomes in outpatients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD). Methods. Prospective observational cohort study was conducted. 281 subjects with verified stable CAD were included in line with the pre-specified criteria. Medication adherence was measured by validated 8-item Morisky scale. Data on cardiovascular events were obtained over the 24-month monitoring period. Study endpoint was a composite cardiovascular event (all-cause mortality, acute myocardial infarction, unstable angina, revascularization surgery, acute heart failure, decompensation of chronic heart failure). Survival analysis by Kaplan — Meier method was performed.Results. 26.0 % of coronary outpatients had low medication adherence (below 6 points by Morisky scale). Groups of patients with satisfactory and low medication adherence were comparable by demography, medical history, and pharmacotherapy. Over the monitoring period composite cardiovascular event was registered in 115 patients (40.9 %). 46.6 % of patients from the low adherence group suffered from the composite event, 38.9 % — from the satisfactory adherence group. Time to the event was lower in the low adherence group — median 24.2 (IQR 7.5-29.2) vs. median 27.9 (IQR 17.4-34.5) months. Cumulative incidence of the composite cardiovascular event over the monitoring period was higher in the low adherence group compared to satisfactory adherence group (p=0.032; log-rank test), also when adjusted for history of cardiovascular events (p=0.033; log-rank test). Satisfactory medication adherence reduced risk of composite cardiovascular event by 37 % (HR 0.63; 95 % CI 0.42-0.94; р=0.025; Cox-regression adjusted for history of cardiovascular events).Conclusion. Coronary outpatients with satisfactory medication adherence had lower risk of cardiovascular events over the 24-month monitoring period. 
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Possibility analysis of antiepileptic drugs import substitution in the Russian Federation Ineffectiveness of carbapenems in real-world clinical practice according to therapeutic drug monitoring data and Roszdravnadzor AIS reports Pharmacotherapy with alpha-1 adrenergic blockers and lipid spectrum correction in patients with urinary disorders Medical and biological research data Focus on lomefloxacin: effectiveness and safety
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1