根据柏林原则检查主要排名

Ying Cheng, N. Liu
{"title":"根据柏林原则检查主要排名","authors":"Ying Cheng, N. Liu","doi":"10.1080/03797720802253686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While the ranking of higher education institutions (HEIs) has become more and more popular, there are increasing concerns about the quality of such ranking. In response to such legitimate expectations, in May 2006, the International Ranking Expert Group (IREG) developed and endorsed a guideline document – the Berlin Principles on Ranking of Higher Education Institutions (hereafter called the Berlin Principles), which consist of sixteen descriptive and prescriptive principles for ranking covering four aspects: the purpose and goal of ranking; the design and weighting of indicators; the collection and processing of data; and the presentation of ranking results. The purpose of this paper is to examine selected HEIs rankings according to the Berlin Principles as well as to propose concrete ‘Fourteen Criteria’ which, if followed, could enhance the quality of ranking. 1. The authors would like to acknowledge that research for this paper was partly supported by the National Social Science Foundation of China (Gr...","PeriodicalId":294207,"journal":{"name":"Higher Education in Europe","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"29","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining Major Rankings According to the Berlin Principles\",\"authors\":\"Ying Cheng, N. Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/03797720802253686\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"While the ranking of higher education institutions (HEIs) has become more and more popular, there are increasing concerns about the quality of such ranking. In response to such legitimate expectations, in May 2006, the International Ranking Expert Group (IREG) developed and endorsed a guideline document – the Berlin Principles on Ranking of Higher Education Institutions (hereafter called the Berlin Principles), which consist of sixteen descriptive and prescriptive principles for ranking covering four aspects: the purpose and goal of ranking; the design and weighting of indicators; the collection and processing of data; and the presentation of ranking results. The purpose of this paper is to examine selected HEIs rankings according to the Berlin Principles as well as to propose concrete ‘Fourteen Criteria’ which, if followed, could enhance the quality of ranking. 1. The authors would like to acknowledge that research for this paper was partly supported by the National Social Science Foundation of China (Gr...\",\"PeriodicalId\":294207,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Higher Education in Europe\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"29\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Higher Education in Europe\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/03797720802253686\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Higher Education in Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03797720802253686","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29

摘要

随着高等教育机构排名越来越受欢迎,人们对排名质量的担忧也越来越多。为了回应这些合理的期望,2006年5月,国际排名专家组(IREG)制定并通过了一份指标性文件——《高等教育机构排名柏林原则》(以下简称《柏林原则》),其中包括16条描述性和规范性的排名原则,涵盖四个方面:排名的目的和目标;指标的设计与权重;数据的收集和处理;以及排名结果的呈现。本文的目的是根据柏林原则研究选定的高等教育机构的排名,并提出具体的“十四项标准”,如果遵循这些标准,可以提高排名的质量。1. 作者在此表示,本文的研究得到了中国国家社会科学基金的部分支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Examining Major Rankings According to the Berlin Principles
While the ranking of higher education institutions (HEIs) has become more and more popular, there are increasing concerns about the quality of such ranking. In response to such legitimate expectations, in May 2006, the International Ranking Expert Group (IREG) developed and endorsed a guideline document – the Berlin Principles on Ranking of Higher Education Institutions (hereafter called the Berlin Principles), which consist of sixteen descriptive and prescriptive principles for ranking covering four aspects: the purpose and goal of ranking; the design and weighting of indicators; the collection and processing of data; and the presentation of ranking results. The purpose of this paper is to examine selected HEIs rankings according to the Berlin Principles as well as to propose concrete ‘Fourteen Criteria’ which, if followed, could enhance the quality of ranking. 1. The authors would like to acknowledge that research for this paper was partly supported by the National Social Science Foundation of China (Gr...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Adaptation of Human Resource Management and Industrial Relations Graduate Courses in Spain to the European Higher Education Area Employment Pattern Pressure for Pragmatic Change in Universities: Azerbaijan Case Study The Promise and Challenge of Increasing Access to Higher Education: Notes from a Romanian/United States Comparative Analysis. Book Reviews and Studies Student Opinion of the Information Policies of Four Spanish Universities with Regard to Erasmus and Other International Programmes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1