澳大利亚两种院前卒中量表检测大血管闭塞性卒中的比较:一项前瞻性观察研究

Cecilia Ostman, C. Garcia-Esperon, T. Lillicrap, K. Alanati, B. Chew, Jennifer Pedler, S. Edwards, M. Parsons, C. Levi, N. Spratt
{"title":"澳大利亚两种院前卒中量表检测大血管闭塞性卒中的比较:一项前瞻性观察研究","authors":"Cecilia Ostman, C. Garcia-Esperon, T. Lillicrap, K. Alanati, B. Chew, Jennifer Pedler, S. Edwards, M. Parsons, C. Levi, N. Spratt","doi":"10.33151/ajp.19.989","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims The Hunter-8 and the ACT-FAST are stroke scales used in Australia for the pre-hospital identification of large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke but have not previously been compared. Moreover, their use in identifying distal arterial occlusions has not previously been assessed. We therefore aimed to describe the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) of the Hunter-8 versus the ACT-FAST for the detection of classic LVO. Methods Both scales were performed on consecutive patients presenting with stroke-like symptoms within 24 hours of symptom onset presenting to the emergency department at a tertiary referral hospital between June 2018 and January 2019. The AUC of the Hunter-8 and the ACT-FAST was calculated for the detection of LVO using different definitions [classic LVO (proximal segment of the middle cerebral artery (MCA-M1), terminal internal carotid artery (T-ICA), or tandem occlusions) and extended LVO (classic LVO plus proximal MCA-M2 and basilar occlusions)]. Results Of 126 suspected stroke patients, there were 24 classic LVO and 34 extended LVO. For detection of classic LVO, the Hunter-8 had an AUC of 0.79 and the ACT-FAST had an AUC of 0.77. For extended LVO, the AUC was 0.71 and 0.70 respectively. Conclusion Both scales represent a significant opportunity to identify patients with proven potential benefit from thrombectomy (classic LVO), however M2 and basilar occlusions may be more challenging to identify with these scales.","PeriodicalId":340334,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Paramedicine","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Two Pre-Hospital Stroke Scales to Detect Large Vessel Occlusion Strokes in Australia: A Prospective Observational Study\",\"authors\":\"Cecilia Ostman, C. Garcia-Esperon, T. Lillicrap, K. Alanati, B. Chew, Jennifer Pedler, S. Edwards, M. Parsons, C. Levi, N. Spratt\",\"doi\":\"10.33151/ajp.19.989\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aims The Hunter-8 and the ACT-FAST are stroke scales used in Australia for the pre-hospital identification of large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke but have not previously been compared. Moreover, their use in identifying distal arterial occlusions has not previously been assessed. We therefore aimed to describe the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) of the Hunter-8 versus the ACT-FAST for the detection of classic LVO. Methods Both scales were performed on consecutive patients presenting with stroke-like symptoms within 24 hours of symptom onset presenting to the emergency department at a tertiary referral hospital between June 2018 and January 2019. The AUC of the Hunter-8 and the ACT-FAST was calculated for the detection of LVO using different definitions [classic LVO (proximal segment of the middle cerebral artery (MCA-M1), terminal internal carotid artery (T-ICA), or tandem occlusions) and extended LVO (classic LVO plus proximal MCA-M2 and basilar occlusions)]. Results Of 126 suspected stroke patients, there were 24 classic LVO and 34 extended LVO. For detection of classic LVO, the Hunter-8 had an AUC of 0.79 and the ACT-FAST had an AUC of 0.77. For extended LVO, the AUC was 0.71 and 0.70 respectively. Conclusion Both scales represent a significant opportunity to identify patients with proven potential benefit from thrombectomy (classic LVO), however M2 and basilar occlusions may be more challenging to identify with these scales.\",\"PeriodicalId\":340334,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Journal of Paramedicine\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Journal of Paramedicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33151/ajp.19.989\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Paramedicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33151/ajp.19.989","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Hunter-8和ACT-FAST是澳大利亚用于院前识别大血管闭塞(LVO)卒中的卒中量表,但此前尚未进行比较。此外,它们在鉴别远端动脉闭塞方面的应用以前没有被评估过。因此,我们的目的是描述猎人-8与ACT-FAST检测经典LVO的接收器工作曲线(AUC)下的面积。方法对2018年6月至2019年1月在某三级转诊医院急诊科就诊的连续24小时内出现卒中样症状的患者进行两种量表的评估。使用不同的定义[经典LVO(大脑中动脉近段(MCA-M1)、颈内动脉末段(T-ICA)或串联闭塞)和扩展LVO(经典LVO加近端MCA-M2和基底动脉闭塞)],计算Hunter-8和ACT-FAST的AUC以检测LVO。结果126例疑似脑卒中患者中,经典LVO 24例,延长LVO 34例。对于经典LVO的检测,Hunter-8的AUC为0.79,ACT-FAST的AUC为0.77。延长LVO的AUC分别为0.71和0.70。结论:这两种量表都是鉴别血栓切除术(典型LVO)患者潜在获益的重要机会,然而M2和基底动脉闭塞可能更具挑战性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of Two Pre-Hospital Stroke Scales to Detect Large Vessel Occlusion Strokes in Australia: A Prospective Observational Study
Aims The Hunter-8 and the ACT-FAST are stroke scales used in Australia for the pre-hospital identification of large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke but have not previously been compared. Moreover, their use in identifying distal arterial occlusions has not previously been assessed. We therefore aimed to describe the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) of the Hunter-8 versus the ACT-FAST for the detection of classic LVO. Methods Both scales were performed on consecutive patients presenting with stroke-like symptoms within 24 hours of symptom onset presenting to the emergency department at a tertiary referral hospital between June 2018 and January 2019. The AUC of the Hunter-8 and the ACT-FAST was calculated for the detection of LVO using different definitions [classic LVO (proximal segment of the middle cerebral artery (MCA-M1), terminal internal carotid artery (T-ICA), or tandem occlusions) and extended LVO (classic LVO plus proximal MCA-M2 and basilar occlusions)]. Results Of 126 suspected stroke patients, there were 24 classic LVO and 34 extended LVO. For detection of classic LVO, the Hunter-8 had an AUC of 0.79 and the ACT-FAST had an AUC of 0.77. For extended LVO, the AUC was 0.71 and 0.70 respectively. Conclusion Both scales represent a significant opportunity to identify patients with proven potential benefit from thrombectomy (classic LVO), however M2 and basilar occlusions may be more challenging to identify with these scales.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Development of An Electronic Referral Proforma from Paramedics to General Practitioners: A Delphi Study Comparison of Two Pre-Hospital Stroke Scales to Detect Large Vessel Occlusion Strokes in Australia: A Prospective Observational Study A New Era of Opportunity – Securing Excellence for Our Journal Experience of Paramedics Providing Care to People Living with Dementia: The Working with Uncertainty Pre-Hospital Early Warning Scores are Associated with Requirement for Medical Retrieval Services
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1