需求学徒:一个初始场景

H. Reubenstein, R. Waters
{"title":"需求学徒:一个初始场景","authors":"H. Reubenstein, R. Waters","doi":"10.1145/75199.75231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The implementation of the Requirements Apprentice has reached the point where it is possible to exhibit a concrete scenario showing the intended basic capabilities of the system. The Requirements Apprentice accepts ambiguous, incomplete, and inconsistent input from a requirements analyst and assists the analyst in creating and validating a coherent requirements description. This processing is supported by a general-purpose reasoning system and a library of requirements cliches that contains reusable descriptions of standard concepts used in requirements. 1 The Requirements Apprentice The philosophy underlying the Requirements Apprentice (RA) is laid out in detail in [14]. In the interest of brevity, this discussion will not be repeated here. However, it is important to keep in mind the position occupied by the RA in the requirements acquisition process. As illustrated by Figure 1, the RA is intended to assist a requirements analyst. The analyst begins the requirements acquisition process by means of a “skull session” that illicits an informal idea of what. is wanted. A good example of the result of such a skull session is the library database requirement sketch [l] that was used as a benchmark by previous Workshops on Software Specification and Design. Starting from such an informal requirements sketch, the RA aLsist.s an analyst (and through the analyst, the end user) t.o arrive at a more complete and more formal requirement. In I his, the RA continues in the tradition of the SAFE project ]2] and differs from most current work on software requirements tools (e.g., [4, 7, 111) that focuses instead on the validation of a requirement that is already stated in a formal way. Viewed from an artificial intelligence perspective, the problem faced by the RA is essentially one of knowledge acqrhitim. Related systems in this area include KLATJS[.lO] and ROGET[5], which provide automated assistance for arquiring new rules for expert systems. These tools support Pernksion to copy without fee all or pert of this material is granted provided that the copies arc not made or distributed for direct commercial advantage, the ACM copyright notice and the title of the publication and its date appear, and notice is given that copying is by permission of the Association for Computing Machinery. To copy othc&se, or to republish, requires a fee and/or specific permission. l D Analyst + Requirements Knowledge Base","PeriodicalId":435917,"journal":{"name":"International Workshop on Software Specification and Design","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"41","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The requirements apprentice: an initial scenario\",\"authors\":\"H. Reubenstein, R. Waters\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/75199.75231\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The implementation of the Requirements Apprentice has reached the point where it is possible to exhibit a concrete scenario showing the intended basic capabilities of the system. The Requirements Apprentice accepts ambiguous, incomplete, and inconsistent input from a requirements analyst and assists the analyst in creating and validating a coherent requirements description. This processing is supported by a general-purpose reasoning system and a library of requirements cliches that contains reusable descriptions of standard concepts used in requirements. 1 The Requirements Apprentice The philosophy underlying the Requirements Apprentice (RA) is laid out in detail in [14]. In the interest of brevity, this discussion will not be repeated here. However, it is important to keep in mind the position occupied by the RA in the requirements acquisition process. As illustrated by Figure 1, the RA is intended to assist a requirements analyst. The analyst begins the requirements acquisition process by means of a “skull session” that illicits an informal idea of what. is wanted. A good example of the result of such a skull session is the library database requirement sketch [l] that was used as a benchmark by previous Workshops on Software Specification and Design. Starting from such an informal requirements sketch, the RA aLsist.s an analyst (and through the analyst, the end user) t.o arrive at a more complete and more formal requirement. In I his, the RA continues in the tradition of the SAFE project ]2] and differs from most current work on software requirements tools (e.g., [4, 7, 111) that focuses instead on the validation of a requirement that is already stated in a formal way. Viewed from an artificial intelligence perspective, the problem faced by the RA is essentially one of knowledge acqrhitim. Related systems in this area include KLATJS[.lO] and ROGET[5], which provide automated assistance for arquiring new rules for expert systems. These tools support Pernksion to copy without fee all or pert of this material is granted provided that the copies arc not made or distributed for direct commercial advantage, the ACM copyright notice and the title of the publication and its date appear, and notice is given that copying is by permission of the Association for Computing Machinery. To copy othc&se, or to republish, requires a fee and/or specific permission. l D Analyst + Requirements Knowledge Base\",\"PeriodicalId\":435917,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Workshop on Software Specification and Design\",\"volume\":\"75 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1989-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"41\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Workshop on Software Specification and Design\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/75199.75231\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Workshop on Software Specification and Design","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/75199.75231","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 41

摘要

需求学徒的实现已经达到了可以展示一个具体的场景来显示系统预期的基本功能的程度。需求学徒接受来自需求分析师的模糊、不完整和不一致的输入,并协助分析师创建和验证一致的需求描述。该处理由通用推理系统和包含需求中使用的标准概念的可重用描述的需求陈词滥调库支持。需求学徒(RA)背后的理念在[14]中有详细阐述。为简洁起见,这里不再重复这个讨论。然而,记住RA在需求获取过程中所占据的位置是很重要的。如图1所示,RA旨在帮助需求分析人员。分析人员通过一个“头脑会议”的方式开始需求获取过程,这个“头脑会议”否定了一个非正式的想法。是想要的。这种讨论结果的一个很好的例子是库数据库需求草图[1],它被以前的软件规范和设计研讨会用作基准。从这样一个非正式的需求草图开始,RA清单。让分析人员(并通过分析人员,最终用户)得出更完整、更正式的需求。在本文中,RA延续了SAFE项目的传统[2],并且不同于当前大多数关于软件需求工具的工作(例如,[4,7,111]),后者侧重于已经以正式方式陈述的需求的验证。从人工智能的角度来看,RA所面临的问题本质上是一个知识的获取问题。该领域的相关系统包括KLATJS[。[lO]和ROGET[5],它们为专家系统获取新规则提供自动辅助。这些工具支持perksion免费复制本材料的全部或部分,前提是这些复制不是为了直接的商业利益而制作或分发,ACM版权声明和出版物标题及其日期出现,并通知复制是由计算机械协会许可的。复制或重新发布需要付费和/或特定许可。D分析师+需求知识库
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The requirements apprentice: an initial scenario
The implementation of the Requirements Apprentice has reached the point where it is possible to exhibit a concrete scenario showing the intended basic capabilities of the system. The Requirements Apprentice accepts ambiguous, incomplete, and inconsistent input from a requirements analyst and assists the analyst in creating and validating a coherent requirements description. This processing is supported by a general-purpose reasoning system and a library of requirements cliches that contains reusable descriptions of standard concepts used in requirements. 1 The Requirements Apprentice The philosophy underlying the Requirements Apprentice (RA) is laid out in detail in [14]. In the interest of brevity, this discussion will not be repeated here. However, it is important to keep in mind the position occupied by the RA in the requirements acquisition process. As illustrated by Figure 1, the RA is intended to assist a requirements analyst. The analyst begins the requirements acquisition process by means of a “skull session” that illicits an informal idea of what. is wanted. A good example of the result of such a skull session is the library database requirement sketch [l] that was used as a benchmark by previous Workshops on Software Specification and Design. Starting from such an informal requirements sketch, the RA aLsist.s an analyst (and through the analyst, the end user) t.o arrive at a more complete and more formal requirement. In I his, the RA continues in the tradition of the SAFE project ]2] and differs from most current work on software requirements tools (e.g., [4, 7, 111) that focuses instead on the validation of a requirement that is already stated in a formal way. Viewed from an artificial intelligence perspective, the problem faced by the RA is essentially one of knowledge acqrhitim. Related systems in this area include KLATJS[.lO] and ROGET[5], which provide automated assistance for arquiring new rules for expert systems. These tools support Pernksion to copy without fee all or pert of this material is granted provided that the copies arc not made or distributed for direct commercial advantage, the ACM copyright notice and the title of the publication and its date appear, and notice is given that copying is by permission of the Association for Computing Machinery. To copy othc&se, or to republish, requires a fee and/or specific permission. l D Analyst + Requirements Knowledge Base
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Message from the Chairs TRMCS in TCOZ Feature Engineering Formalizing System Structure Concern-driven design for a specification language supporting component-based software engineerin
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1