工科学生的社会化过程:男女经验的差异

M. Riney, Janet G. Froeschle
{"title":"工科学生的社会化过程:男女经验的差异","authors":"M. Riney, Janet G. Froeschle","doi":"10.5929/2011.2.1.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The primary purpose of this study was to explore the personal experiences of female and male engineering students in both Division I (17 females and 16 males) and Division II (11 females and 11 males) programs. Analyses of narratives of 55 undergraduate engineering students revealed that the sociocultural experiences of female and male students differ in substantial ways in that socialization processes into engineering are problematic for women, who often rely on one another to bolster their self-efficacy perceptions and resiliency. Another important finding is that Division II female students were provided much more support by both professors and male peers than were their Division I counterparts, who reported more incidents of negative interactions with male students, especially when working in collaborative groups.","PeriodicalId":189332,"journal":{"name":"Administrative Issues Journal","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SOCIALIZATION PROCESSES OF ENGINEERING STUDENTS: DIFFERENCES IN THE EXPERIENCES OF FEMALES AND MALES\",\"authors\":\"M. Riney, Janet G. Froeschle\",\"doi\":\"10.5929/2011.2.1.9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The primary purpose of this study was to explore the personal experiences of female and male engineering students in both Division I (17 females and 16 males) and Division II (11 females and 11 males) programs. Analyses of narratives of 55 undergraduate engineering students revealed that the sociocultural experiences of female and male students differ in substantial ways in that socialization processes into engineering are problematic for women, who often rely on one another to bolster their self-efficacy perceptions and resiliency. Another important finding is that Division II female students were provided much more support by both professors and male peers than were their Division I counterparts, who reported more incidents of negative interactions with male students, especially when working in collaborative groups.\",\"PeriodicalId\":189332,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Administrative Issues Journal\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Administrative Issues Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5929/2011.2.1.9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Administrative Issues Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5929/2011.2.1.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

本研究的主要目的是探讨一科(17名女性和16名男性)和二科(11名女性和11名男性)工程专业男女学生的个人经历。对55名工科本科生的叙述进行的分析显示,男女学生的社会文化经历在很大程度上存在差异,因为进入工程学的社会化过程对女性来说是有问题的,她们经常依靠彼此来增强自我效能感和弹性。另一个重要的发现是,与一年级的女生相比,二年级的女生得到了教授和男生更多的支持。一年级的女生报告说,她们与男生的负面互动事件更多,尤其是在合作小组中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
SOCIALIZATION PROCESSES OF ENGINEERING STUDENTS: DIFFERENCES IN THE EXPERIENCES OF FEMALES AND MALES
The primary purpose of this study was to explore the personal experiences of female and male engineering students in both Division I (17 females and 16 males) and Division II (11 females and 11 males) programs. Analyses of narratives of 55 undergraduate engineering students revealed that the sociocultural experiences of female and male students differ in substantial ways in that socialization processes into engineering are problematic for women, who often rely on one another to bolster their self-efficacy perceptions and resiliency. Another important finding is that Division II female students were provided much more support by both professors and male peers than were their Division I counterparts, who reported more incidents of negative interactions with male students, especially when working in collaborative groups.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
When Culture and Change Collide In Higher Education: A Case Study at One University Authentic Engagement through Workplace Pedagogy MASTERING CRITICAL THINKING COMPETENCIES IN ONLINE GRADUATE CLASSES Gender Difference in STEM Career Aspiration and Social-Cognitive Factors in Collectivist and Individualist Cultures PROTECT STUDENTS’ EDUCATIONAL FUTURES THROUGH SOCIAL CAPITAL OPPORTUNITIES IN SPORT AND NON - SPORT EXTRACURRICULAR ACTIVITIES
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1