欧盟对朝政策:一个规范现实主义的解释

Sangtu Ko
{"title":"欧盟对朝政策:一个规范现实主义的解释","authors":"Sangtu Ko","doi":"10.31780/JPU.2019.9.1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the EU’s North Korea policy and finds that it has developed through three stages: from active engagement to critical engagement, and finally to active pressure. The engagement policy was triggered by the food shortage in 1995. However, it changed to a more realist policy in response to DPRK’s nuclear provocation. The change from engagement to sanctions provides evidence of the EU’s alteration from its traditional normative foreign policy. This paper further investigates the dynamics behind the EU’s North Korea policy shift. The analysis shows that the EU tends to adhere to solutions such as dialogue when dealing with the DPRK nuclear problem, whereas member states prefer to apply pressure through sanctions. This has shifted EU’s North Korea policy from a normative to a realist approach.","PeriodicalId":338946,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Peace and Unification","volume":"2015 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EU’s Policy toward North Korea: A Normative Realist Explanation\",\"authors\":\"Sangtu Ko\",\"doi\":\"10.31780/JPU.2019.9.1.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper examines the EU’s North Korea policy and finds that it has developed through three stages: from active engagement to critical engagement, and finally to active pressure. The engagement policy was triggered by the food shortage in 1995. However, it changed to a more realist policy in response to DPRK’s nuclear provocation. The change from engagement to sanctions provides evidence of the EU’s alteration from its traditional normative foreign policy. This paper further investigates the dynamics behind the EU’s North Korea policy shift. The analysis shows that the EU tends to adhere to solutions such as dialogue when dealing with the DPRK nuclear problem, whereas member states prefer to apply pressure through sanctions. This has shifted EU’s North Korea policy from a normative to a realist approach.\",\"PeriodicalId\":338946,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Peace and Unification\",\"volume\":\"2015 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Peace and Unification\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31780/JPU.2019.9.1.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Peace and Unification","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31780/JPU.2019.9.1.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文考察了欧盟的对朝政策,发现其发展经历了三个阶段:从积极接触到批判性接触,最后到积极施压。1995年粮食短缺引发了参与政策。然而,面对朝鲜的核挑衅,中国转向了更为现实的政策。从接触到制裁的转变,证明了欧盟正在改变其传统的规范性外交政策。本文进一步探讨了欧盟对朝政策转变背后的动态。分析表明,欧盟在处理朝核问题时倾向于坚持对话等解决方案,而成员国则倾向于通过制裁施加压力。这使得欧盟的对朝政策从规范性转向现实主义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
EU’s Policy toward North Korea: A Normative Realist Explanation
This paper examines the EU’s North Korea policy and finds that it has developed through three stages: from active engagement to critical engagement, and finally to active pressure. The engagement policy was triggered by the food shortage in 1995. However, it changed to a more realist policy in response to DPRK’s nuclear provocation. The change from engagement to sanctions provides evidence of the EU’s alteration from its traditional normative foreign policy. This paper further investigates the dynamics behind the EU’s North Korea policy shift. The analysis shows that the EU tends to adhere to solutions such as dialogue when dealing with the DPRK nuclear problem, whereas member states prefer to apply pressure through sanctions. This has shifted EU’s North Korea policy from a normative to a realist approach.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
How Is the Distrust Trap Pervasive in East Asia?: Focusing on Incomplete Sovereignty with a Prospect Theory North Korea’s Ping-Pong Diplomacy?: Revisiting the 1979 Pyongyang World Table Tennis Championships Comparison of Soviet Aid to North Korea and North Vietnam in the 1950s and 1960s EU’s Policy toward North Korea: A Normative Realist Explanation Studies on the North Korean Monetary Economy in the Kim Jong-un Era
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1