现代科学:证明二元论是正确的人的科学

G. Little
{"title":"现代科学:证明二元论是正确的人的科学","authors":"G. Little","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3674700","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper is continuation of a tradition of human development that has existed almost for all human existence. Building better ideas that enable better management of circumstance. Ideas adopted more fit for the purpose of living. \n \nConceptually it is the shift from ‘philosophy’ on a subject, to a tighter intellectual position usually referred as ‘science’. Natural philosophy, alchemy, and religious explanation of environmental events have all been discarded as empirical evidence, theory and research provided better explanation and thus adopted as better ideas to manage circumstance. \n \nSpecifically, this paper provides an original intellectual base whereby humanity better understands itself and all outputs and characteristics of the system under study, namely a-person-in-their-environment. In finalizing this base (circa 2014) all historical writing on all aspects of humanity must be called into question, and this new paradigm applied as the ‘lens’ via which we enable greater understanding of ourselves, thus enabling improved decisions on how to manage ourselves both individually and socially such all people enjoy improved life experience. \n \nThe dualist (mind and brain separate) science of humanity was first proposed by Descartes circa 1650. It has never been proved, and the world adopted monism (mind and brain the same) version of humanity not because it proved correct, but due none could prove it incorrect and prove dualism correct. Until now. \nFrom 1974, to today, Graham Little has identified and resolved every conceivable issue implicated in proving dualism correct and monism wrong. \n \nThis paper provides an overview of the dualism science of people. It underlines the major changes that will occur when dualism is finally adopted ss the correct science of people, with major gains in personal well-being, changes in social and economic policy, depth of insight into social development including how to ensure improved wealth creation and wealth distribution, reduced suicides, reduced social tension and violence, better mental health, deepening social respect and understanding of the real nature of a diverse society and how to live effectively in such a society. \n \nThis paper also outlines the plan for proving dualism to the highest intellectual quality standard making it an irresistible scientific proposition that must be adopted as the cornerstone of humanity’s intellectual position.","PeriodicalId":226815,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy & Methodology of Economics eJournal","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modern Science: Proof Dualism As the Correct Science of People Derived From the Work of Graham Little\",\"authors\":\"G. Little\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3674700\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper is continuation of a tradition of human development that has existed almost for all human existence. Building better ideas that enable better management of circumstance. Ideas adopted more fit for the purpose of living. \\n \\nConceptually it is the shift from ‘philosophy’ on a subject, to a tighter intellectual position usually referred as ‘science’. Natural philosophy, alchemy, and religious explanation of environmental events have all been discarded as empirical evidence, theory and research provided better explanation and thus adopted as better ideas to manage circumstance. \\n \\nSpecifically, this paper provides an original intellectual base whereby humanity better understands itself and all outputs and characteristics of the system under study, namely a-person-in-their-environment. In finalizing this base (circa 2014) all historical writing on all aspects of humanity must be called into question, and this new paradigm applied as the ‘lens’ via which we enable greater understanding of ourselves, thus enabling improved decisions on how to manage ourselves both individually and socially such all people enjoy improved life experience. \\n \\nThe dualist (mind and brain separate) science of humanity was first proposed by Descartes circa 1650. It has never been proved, and the world adopted monism (mind and brain the same) version of humanity not because it proved correct, but due none could prove it incorrect and prove dualism correct. Until now. \\nFrom 1974, to today, Graham Little has identified and resolved every conceivable issue implicated in proving dualism correct and monism wrong. \\n \\nThis paper provides an overview of the dualism science of people. It underlines the major changes that will occur when dualism is finally adopted ss the correct science of people, with major gains in personal well-being, changes in social and economic policy, depth of insight into social development including how to ensure improved wealth creation and wealth distribution, reduced suicides, reduced social tension and violence, better mental health, deepening social respect and understanding of the real nature of a diverse society and how to live effectively in such a society. \\n \\nThis paper also outlines the plan for proving dualism to the highest intellectual quality standard making it an irresistible scientific proposition that must be adopted as the cornerstone of humanity’s intellectual position.\",\"PeriodicalId\":226815,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Philosophy & Methodology of Economics eJournal\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Philosophy & Methodology of Economics eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3674700\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophy & Methodology of Economics eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3674700","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇论文是对人类发展传统的延续,这种传统几乎存在于所有人类的存在之中。建立更好的想法,从而更好地管理环境。采纳更适合生活目的的思想。从概念上讲,它是从一个学科的“哲学”转向一个更紧密的知识立场,通常被称为“科学”。自然哲学、炼金术和对环境事件的宗教解释都被抛弃为经验证据,理论和研究提供了更好的解释,因此被采纳为管理环境的更好的想法。具体来说,本文提供了一个原始的智力基础,使人类更好地理解自己以及所研究系统的所有输出和特征,即一个人在他们的环境中。在最终确定这一基础(大约2014年)时,必须对所有关于人类各个方面的历史著作进行质疑,并将这种新范式作为“镜头”加以应用,通过这种“镜头”,我们能够更好地了解自己,从而能够更好地决定如何管理自己,无论是个人还是社会,这样所有人都能享受到更好的生活体验。人类的二元论(精神和大脑分开)最早是由笛卡尔在1650年左右提出的。它从来没有被证明过,世界采用了一元论(思想和大脑相同)的人类版本,不是因为它被证明是正确的,而是因为没有人能证明它是错误的,证明二元论是正确的。直到现在。从1974年至今,格雷厄姆·利特尔已经发现并解决了每一个可以想到的问题,证明二元论是正确的,一元论是错误的。本文概述了人的二元论科学。它强调,当正确的人的科学最终采用二元论时,将发生重大变化,个人福祉将获得重大收益,社会和经济政策将发生变化,对社会发展有深入的了解,包括如何确保改善财富创造和财富分配,减少自杀,减少社会紧张和暴力,改善心理健康,加深社会对多元化社会本质的尊重和理解,以及如何在这样一个社会中有效地生活。本文还概述了证明二元论达到最高智力素质标准的计划,使其成为一个不可抗拒的科学命题,必须作为人类智力地位的基石。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Modern Science: Proof Dualism As the Correct Science of People Derived From the Work of Graham Little
This paper is continuation of a tradition of human development that has existed almost for all human existence. Building better ideas that enable better management of circumstance. Ideas adopted more fit for the purpose of living. Conceptually it is the shift from ‘philosophy’ on a subject, to a tighter intellectual position usually referred as ‘science’. Natural philosophy, alchemy, and religious explanation of environmental events have all been discarded as empirical evidence, theory and research provided better explanation and thus adopted as better ideas to manage circumstance. Specifically, this paper provides an original intellectual base whereby humanity better understands itself and all outputs and characteristics of the system under study, namely a-person-in-their-environment. In finalizing this base (circa 2014) all historical writing on all aspects of humanity must be called into question, and this new paradigm applied as the ‘lens’ via which we enable greater understanding of ourselves, thus enabling improved decisions on how to manage ourselves both individually and socially such all people enjoy improved life experience. The dualist (mind and brain separate) science of humanity was first proposed by Descartes circa 1650. It has never been proved, and the world adopted monism (mind and brain the same) version of humanity not because it proved correct, but due none could prove it incorrect and prove dualism correct. Until now. From 1974, to today, Graham Little has identified and resolved every conceivable issue implicated in proving dualism correct and monism wrong. This paper provides an overview of the dualism science of people. It underlines the major changes that will occur when dualism is finally adopted ss the correct science of people, with major gains in personal well-being, changes in social and economic policy, depth of insight into social development including how to ensure improved wealth creation and wealth distribution, reduced suicides, reduced social tension and violence, better mental health, deepening social respect and understanding of the real nature of a diverse society and how to live effectively in such a society. This paper also outlines the plan for proving dualism to the highest intellectual quality standard making it an irresistible scientific proposition that must be adopted as the cornerstone of humanity’s intellectual position.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
"The Eyes and Ears of the Agricultural Markets": A History of Information in Interwar Agricultural Economics Deepening and Widening Social Identity Analysis in Economics In Search of Santa Claus: Samuelson, Stigler, and Coase Theorem Worlds Reports from China: Joan Robinson as Observer and Travel Writer, 1953-78 Introduction to a Symposium on Carl Menger on the Centenary of his Death
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1