论订单流程的信息内容:一个实验

Christophe Bisière, J. Décamps, S. Lovo
{"title":"论订单流程的信息内容:一个实验","authors":"Christophe Bisière, J. Décamps, S. Lovo","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1282165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We report results of a series of experiments that simulates trading in financial market. The specific format of our experiment allows to unambiguously measure the information content of the order flow and to disentangle the impact that risk attitudes and belief updating rules have on market informational efficiency. On the one hand, we show that many of the so called \"irrational\" behaviors are not so if one takes into account subjects' risk attitude. On the other hand we find evidence of non-Bayesian updating of beliefs. Risk neutral subjects are rare and subjects displaying risk aversion or risk loving tend to ignore private information when their prior beliefs on the asset fundamentals are strong. This behavior implies that when the market has a sharp opinion on an asset fundamental value, the private information dispersed in the economy struggles to enter trading prices. Non-Bayesian belief updating has an ambiguous effect on market efficiency as it reduces (improves) the information flow when subject prior belief is weak (strong).","PeriodicalId":440574,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Asymmetric & Private Information (Topic)","volume":"38 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the Information Content of the Order Flow: An Experiment\",\"authors\":\"Christophe Bisière, J. Décamps, S. Lovo\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1282165\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We report results of a series of experiments that simulates trading in financial market. The specific format of our experiment allows to unambiguously measure the information content of the order flow and to disentangle the impact that risk attitudes and belief updating rules have on market informational efficiency. On the one hand, we show that many of the so called \\\"irrational\\\" behaviors are not so if one takes into account subjects' risk attitude. On the other hand we find evidence of non-Bayesian updating of beliefs. Risk neutral subjects are rare and subjects displaying risk aversion or risk loving tend to ignore private information when their prior beliefs on the asset fundamentals are strong. This behavior implies that when the market has a sharp opinion on an asset fundamental value, the private information dispersed in the economy struggles to enter trading prices. Non-Bayesian belief updating has an ambiguous effect on market efficiency as it reduces (improves) the information flow when subject prior belief is weak (strong).\",\"PeriodicalId\":440574,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Asymmetric & Private Information (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"38 2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Asymmetric & Private Information (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1282165\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Asymmetric & Private Information (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1282165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

我们报告了一系列模拟金融市场交易的实验结果。我们实验的特定格式允许明确地测量订单流的信息内容,并解开风险态度和信念更新规则对市场信息效率的影响。一方面,我们表明,如果考虑到受试者的风险态度,许多所谓的“非理性”行为并非如此。另一方面,我们发现了非贝叶斯信念更新的证据。风险中性的主体是罕见的,表现出风险厌恶或风险爱好的主体倾向于忽视私人信息,当他们对资产基本面的先验信念是强大的。这种行为意味着,当市场对一项资产的基本价值有明确的看法时,分散在经济中的私人信息很难进入交易价格。非贝叶斯信念更新对市场效率的影响是模糊的,因为当主体先验信念弱(强)时,它会减少(提高)信息流。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
On the Information Content of the Order Flow: An Experiment
We report results of a series of experiments that simulates trading in financial market. The specific format of our experiment allows to unambiguously measure the information content of the order flow and to disentangle the impact that risk attitudes and belief updating rules have on market informational efficiency. On the one hand, we show that many of the so called "irrational" behaviors are not so if one takes into account subjects' risk attitude. On the other hand we find evidence of non-Bayesian updating of beliefs. Risk neutral subjects are rare and subjects displaying risk aversion or risk loving tend to ignore private information when their prior beliefs on the asset fundamentals are strong. This behavior implies that when the market has a sharp opinion on an asset fundamental value, the private information dispersed in the economy struggles to enter trading prices. Non-Bayesian belief updating has an ambiguous effect on market efficiency as it reduces (improves) the information flow when subject prior belief is weak (strong).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Serial Vickrey Mechanism First to 'Read' the News: News Analytics and High Frequency Trading Essays on Financial Intermediation - Dissertation Executive Summary Incidence and Structure of European Buyout Syndicates: Empirical Results from an Integrated Study The Optimal Choice of Pre-Launch Reviewer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1