欧盟支出对地区福祉的影响

L. Dellmuth
{"title":"欧盟支出对地区福祉的影响","authors":"L. Dellmuth","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv1rnpjjr.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter examines the effects of EU spending on regional well-being. In doing so, the chapter tests the observable implications of the theory put forward in Chapter 3 about the conditions under which EU spending can enhance well-being. It makes the case for using a quantitative approach, which is uniquely suitable for estimating EU spending effects because it takes into account potential endogenous effects, temporal factors and structural breaks. \nproceeds with an explanatory analysis of. Drawing on the quantitative dataset introduced in Chapter 4, this chapter presents and discusses two main results. The first result is that EU social spending enhances employment and unemployment outcomes, but only in the rich regions. By contrast, there is no robust evidence of social spending effects on youth activity or public health. The second main finding is that EU social investments exacerbate income inequality in poor regions.","PeriodicalId":388586,"journal":{"name":"Is Europe Good for You?","volume":"110 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EU Spending Effects on Regional Well-Being\",\"authors\":\"L. Dellmuth\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/j.ctv1rnpjjr.11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter examines the effects of EU spending on regional well-being. In doing so, the chapter tests the observable implications of the theory put forward in Chapter 3 about the conditions under which EU spending can enhance well-being. It makes the case for using a quantitative approach, which is uniquely suitable for estimating EU spending effects because it takes into account potential endogenous effects, temporal factors and structural breaks. \\nproceeds with an explanatory analysis of. Drawing on the quantitative dataset introduced in Chapter 4, this chapter presents and discusses two main results. The first result is that EU social spending enhances employment and unemployment outcomes, but only in the rich regions. By contrast, there is no robust evidence of social spending effects on youth activity or public health. The second main finding is that EU social investments exacerbate income inequality in poor regions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":388586,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Is Europe Good for You?\",\"volume\":\"110 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Is Europe Good for You?\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1rnpjjr.11\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Is Europe Good for You?","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1rnpjjr.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本章考察了欧盟支出对地区福利的影响。在此过程中,本章测试了第3章中提出的关于欧盟支出可以提高福祉的条件的理论的可观察意义。它提出了使用定量方法的理由,这种方法特别适合于估计欧盟的支出效应,因为它考虑了潜在的内生效应、时间因素和结构性断裂。的解释性分析。利用第4章中介绍的定量数据集,本章提出并讨论了两个主要结果。第一个结果是,欧盟的社会支出提高了就业和失业的结果,但仅限于富裕地区。相比之下,没有强有力的证据表明社会支出对青年活动或公共卫生有影响。第二个主要发现是,欧盟的社会投资加剧了贫困地区的收入不平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
EU Spending Effects on Regional Well-Being
This chapter examines the effects of EU spending on regional well-being. In doing so, the chapter tests the observable implications of the theory put forward in Chapter 3 about the conditions under which EU spending can enhance well-being. It makes the case for using a quantitative approach, which is uniquely suitable for estimating EU spending effects because it takes into account potential endogenous effects, temporal factors and structural breaks. proceeds with an explanatory analysis of. Drawing on the quantitative dataset introduced in Chapter 4, this chapter presents and discusses two main results. The first result is that EU social spending enhances employment and unemployment outcomes, but only in the rich regions. By contrast, there is no robust evidence of social spending effects on youth activity or public health. The second main finding is that EU social investments exacerbate income inequality in poor regions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
EU Spending Effects on Regional Well-Being Barriers to Improving Regional Well-Being Regional Well-Being, Inclusive Growth and EU Legitimacy Back Matter Rethinking Regional Development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1