G. Johnson, P. Swaszek, R. Hartnett, R. Shalaev, M. Wiggins
{"title":"eLoran作为GPS备份的评价","authors":"G. Johnson, P. Swaszek, R. Hartnett, R. Shalaev, M. Wiggins","doi":"10.1109/THS.2007.370027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2001, the Volpe National Transportation Systems Center completed an evaluation of the Global Positioning System (GPS) vulnerabilities and the potential impacts to transportation systems in the United States. One of the recommendations of this study was for the operation of backup system(s) to GPS; Loran C, which has been operated by the U.S. Coast Guard for the past 40 years, was identified as one possible backup system. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has been leading a team consisting of members from industry, government, and academia to evaluate the future of Loran-C in the United States. In a recently completed Navigation Transition Study, the FAA concluded that Loran-C, as an independent radionavigation system, is theoretically the best backup for the GPS; however, in order for Loran-C to be considered a viable back-up system to GPS, it must be able to meet the requirements of non-precision approach (NPA) for the aviation community and the harbor entrance and approach (HEA) requirements for the maritime community. The accuracy requirements for Loran to be used as a backup system are 307 m for NPA and 20 m for HEA. In addition, there are integrity, availability, and continuity requirements. The current Loran system of 24 stations provides a stated absolute accuracy in navigation position of only 0.25 NM; however, enhanced Loran or eLoran has the capability of meeting the stringent requirements for NPA and HEA. In order to meet the accuracy requirements user receivers must use additional secondary factors (ASFs) in calculating the user position. ASFs are propagation time adjustments that are subtracted from the receiver's times of arrival (TOAs) to account for propagation over non-seawater paths. These ASFs vary both spatially and temporally and both types of variations need to be accounted for to meet the accuracy targets. The current approaches to meeting the needs of the aviation and maritime communities are slightly different. For maritime navigation, the spatial variations will be accounted for through the use of a grid of ASF values that is known by the receiver a priori. As one component of the eLoran system, a reference station located nearby the harbor will be used to estimate the temporal changes in the ASFs relative to the published spatial grid; these differences will be broadcast using the Loran data channel (9th pulse) to the user receiver. This general method to HEA navigation was discussed by the authors in 2003 (ION AM 2003). More recently (ION GNSS 2006) we developed a technique to process survey data into a harbor grid. For the aviation community the approach is to measure and publish a set of ASF values for each airport. These airport ASFs will be adjusted to be in the middle of the seasonal variation in order to minimize the maximum error. This approach has been discussed by the authors most recently in papers presented in 2005 (ILA 34) and 2006 (ION NTM 2006). In this paper we show results from both flight tests at various airports around the U.S. and maritime tests in the Thames River in CT. These results demonstrate the ability of eLoran to meet the accuracy requirements for both NPA and HEA using the ASF methods we have proposed.","PeriodicalId":428684,"journal":{"name":"2007 IEEE Conference on Technologies for Homeland Security","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"31","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Evaluation of eLoran as a Backup to GPS\",\"authors\":\"G. Johnson, P. Swaszek, R. Hartnett, R. Shalaev, M. Wiggins\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/THS.2007.370027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In 2001, the Volpe National Transportation Systems Center completed an evaluation of the Global Positioning System (GPS) vulnerabilities and the potential impacts to transportation systems in the United States. One of the recommendations of this study was for the operation of backup system(s) to GPS; Loran C, which has been operated by the U.S. Coast Guard for the past 40 years, was identified as one possible backup system. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has been leading a team consisting of members from industry, government, and academia to evaluate the future of Loran-C in the United States. In a recently completed Navigation Transition Study, the FAA concluded that Loran-C, as an independent radionavigation system, is theoretically the best backup for the GPS; however, in order for Loran-C to be considered a viable back-up system to GPS, it must be able to meet the requirements of non-precision approach (NPA) for the aviation community and the harbor entrance and approach (HEA) requirements for the maritime community. The accuracy requirements for Loran to be used as a backup system are 307 m for NPA and 20 m for HEA. In addition, there are integrity, availability, and continuity requirements. The current Loran system of 24 stations provides a stated absolute accuracy in navigation position of only 0.25 NM; however, enhanced Loran or eLoran has the capability of meeting the stringent requirements for NPA and HEA. In order to meet the accuracy requirements user receivers must use additional secondary factors (ASFs) in calculating the user position. ASFs are propagation time adjustments that are subtracted from the receiver's times of arrival (TOAs) to account for propagation over non-seawater paths. These ASFs vary both spatially and temporally and both types of variations need to be accounted for to meet the accuracy targets. The current approaches to meeting the needs of the aviation and maritime communities are slightly different. For maritime navigation, the spatial variations will be accounted for through the use of a grid of ASF values that is known by the receiver a priori. As one component of the eLoran system, a reference station located nearby the harbor will be used to estimate the temporal changes in the ASFs relative to the published spatial grid; these differences will be broadcast using the Loran data channel (9th pulse) to the user receiver. This general method to HEA navigation was discussed by the authors in 2003 (ION AM 2003). More recently (ION GNSS 2006) we developed a technique to process survey data into a harbor grid. For the aviation community the approach is to measure and publish a set of ASF values for each airport. These airport ASFs will be adjusted to be in the middle of the seasonal variation in order to minimize the maximum error. This approach has been discussed by the authors most recently in papers presented in 2005 (ILA 34) and 2006 (ION NTM 2006). In this paper we show results from both flight tests at various airports around the U.S. and maritime tests in the Thames River in CT. These results demonstrate the ability of eLoran to meet the accuracy requirements for both NPA and HEA using the ASF methods we have proposed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":428684,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2007 IEEE Conference on Technologies for Homeland Security\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"31\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2007 IEEE Conference on Technologies for Homeland Security\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/THS.2007.370027\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2007 IEEE Conference on Technologies for Homeland Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/THS.2007.370027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31
摘要
2001年,Volpe国家交通系统中心完成了对全球定位系统(GPS)脆弱性及其对美国交通系统潜在影响的评估。本研究的建议之一是对GPS的备份系统进行操作;在过去的40年里,美国海岸警卫队一直在使用Loran C,它被认为是一个可能的备用系统。美国联邦航空管理局(FAA)一直在领导一个由工业界、政府和学术界成员组成的团队,评估Loran-C在美国的未来。在最近完成的导航过渡研究中,联邦航空局得出结论,Loran-C作为一个独立的无线电导航系统,理论上是GPS的最佳备份;然而,为了使Loran-C被认为是GPS的可行备用系统,它必须能够满足航空界的非精确进近(NPA)要求和海事界的港口入口和进近(HEA)要求。Loran作为备用系统的精度要求为NPA为307米,HEA为20米。此外,还有完整性、可用性和连续性需求。目前由24个站点组成的Loran系统在导航位置上的绝对精度仅为0.25海里;然而,增强型Loran或eLoran具有满足NPA和HEA严格要求的能力。为了满足精度要求,用户接收机在计算用户位置时必须使用附加的辅助因子(asf)。asf是从接收机到达时间(TOAs)中减去的传播时间调整值,以考虑在非海水路径上的传播。这些asf在空间和时间上都有变化,需要考虑这两种类型的变化,以满足精度目标。目前满足航空界和海运界需求的方法略有不同。对于海上导航,将通过使用接收器先验地知道的ASF值网格来解释空间变化。作为eLoran系统的一个组成部分,位于港口附近的参考站将用于估计相对于公布的空间网格的asf的时间变化;这些差异将使用Loran数据通道(第9脉冲)广播到用户接收器。作者在2003年(ION AM 2003)对HEA导航的一般方法进行了讨论。最近(ION GNSS 2006),我们开发了一种将调查数据处理成港口网格的技术。对于航空界来说,方法是测量并发布每个机场的一组ASF值。这些机场asf将被调整到季节变化的中间位置,以尽量减少最大误差。作者最近在2005年(ILA 34)和2006年(ION NTM 2006)发表的论文中讨论了这种方法。在本文中,我们展示了在美国各地机场进行的飞行测试和在康涅狄格州泰晤士河进行的海上测试的结果。这些结果表明,eLoran能够使用我们提出的ASF方法满足NPA和HEA的精度要求。
In 2001, the Volpe National Transportation Systems Center completed an evaluation of the Global Positioning System (GPS) vulnerabilities and the potential impacts to transportation systems in the United States. One of the recommendations of this study was for the operation of backup system(s) to GPS; Loran C, which has been operated by the U.S. Coast Guard for the past 40 years, was identified as one possible backup system. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has been leading a team consisting of members from industry, government, and academia to evaluate the future of Loran-C in the United States. In a recently completed Navigation Transition Study, the FAA concluded that Loran-C, as an independent radionavigation system, is theoretically the best backup for the GPS; however, in order for Loran-C to be considered a viable back-up system to GPS, it must be able to meet the requirements of non-precision approach (NPA) for the aviation community and the harbor entrance and approach (HEA) requirements for the maritime community. The accuracy requirements for Loran to be used as a backup system are 307 m for NPA and 20 m for HEA. In addition, there are integrity, availability, and continuity requirements. The current Loran system of 24 stations provides a stated absolute accuracy in navigation position of only 0.25 NM; however, enhanced Loran or eLoran has the capability of meeting the stringent requirements for NPA and HEA. In order to meet the accuracy requirements user receivers must use additional secondary factors (ASFs) in calculating the user position. ASFs are propagation time adjustments that are subtracted from the receiver's times of arrival (TOAs) to account for propagation over non-seawater paths. These ASFs vary both spatially and temporally and both types of variations need to be accounted for to meet the accuracy targets. The current approaches to meeting the needs of the aviation and maritime communities are slightly different. For maritime navigation, the spatial variations will be accounted for through the use of a grid of ASF values that is known by the receiver a priori. As one component of the eLoran system, a reference station located nearby the harbor will be used to estimate the temporal changes in the ASFs relative to the published spatial grid; these differences will be broadcast using the Loran data channel (9th pulse) to the user receiver. This general method to HEA navigation was discussed by the authors in 2003 (ION AM 2003). More recently (ION GNSS 2006) we developed a technique to process survey data into a harbor grid. For the aviation community the approach is to measure and publish a set of ASF values for each airport. These airport ASFs will be adjusted to be in the middle of the seasonal variation in order to minimize the maximum error. This approach has been discussed by the authors most recently in papers presented in 2005 (ILA 34) and 2006 (ION NTM 2006). In this paper we show results from both flight tests at various airports around the U.S. and maritime tests in the Thames River in CT. These results demonstrate the ability of eLoran to meet the accuracy requirements for both NPA and HEA using the ASF methods we have proposed.