公民对气候变化和疫苗的政治话语

C. Moreno-Castro, Małgorzata Dzimińska, Aneta Krzewińska, I. Warwas, Ana Serra-Perales
{"title":"公民对气候变化和疫苗的政治话语","authors":"C. Moreno-Castro, Małgorzata Dzimińska, Aneta Krzewińska, I. Warwas, Ana Serra-Perales","doi":"10.4018/978-1-7998-8057-8.ch017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main objective of this chapter is to compare the political discourses of Polish and Spanish citizens on science issues such as vaccines and climate change expressed by the citizens participating in the public consultations held in València (Spain) and Łódź (Poland) during the autumn of 2019. As the general elections were held very close to the public consultations in both countries, it was expected that there would be references to election campaigns, political parties, or public policymaking during the debates. Then, those statements explicitly expressing political views on climate change and vaccines were selected from the debate transcripts before applying five specific frames and variables for analysis and interpretation. The results show that more political opinions were expressed in the debates on climate change than on vaccines. Moreover, the citizens' views on the science-politics dichotomy mainly were negative, with the men mixing science with politics more than the women.","PeriodicalId":121894,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Politics, Communication, and the Impact on Democracy","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Citizens' Political Discourses on Climate Change and Vaccines\",\"authors\":\"C. Moreno-Castro, Małgorzata Dzimińska, Aneta Krzewińska, I. Warwas, Ana Serra-Perales\",\"doi\":\"10.4018/978-1-7998-8057-8.ch017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The main objective of this chapter is to compare the political discourses of Polish and Spanish citizens on science issues such as vaccines and climate change expressed by the citizens participating in the public consultations held in València (Spain) and Łódź (Poland) during the autumn of 2019. As the general elections were held very close to the public consultations in both countries, it was expected that there would be references to election campaigns, political parties, or public policymaking during the debates. Then, those statements explicitly expressing political views on climate change and vaccines were selected from the debate transcripts before applying five specific frames and variables for analysis and interpretation. The results show that more political opinions were expressed in the debates on climate change than on vaccines. Moreover, the citizens' views on the science-politics dichotomy mainly were negative, with the men mixing science with politics more than the women.\",\"PeriodicalId\":121894,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contemporary Politics, Communication, and the Impact on Democracy\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contemporary Politics, Communication, and the Impact on Democracy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-8057-8.ch017\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Politics, Communication, and the Impact on Democracy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-8057-8.ch017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本章的主要目的是比较波兰和西班牙公民在疫苗和气候变化等科学问题上的政治言论,这些言论是参加2019年秋季在瓦伦滕西亚(西班牙)和Łódź(波兰)举行的公众磋商的公民所表达的。由于两国的议会选举是在非常接近公众协商的情况下举行的,因此预计在辩论中会提到选举运动、政党或公共政策制定。然后,从辩论笔录中选择明确表达对气候变化和疫苗的政治观点的发言,然后应用五个具体框架和变量进行分析和解释。结果显示,在气候变化的辩论中,政治观点的表达多于疫苗辩论。此外,公民对科学与政治二分法的看法主要是负面的,男性比女性更多地将科学与政治混为一谈。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Citizens' Political Discourses on Climate Change and Vaccines
The main objective of this chapter is to compare the political discourses of Polish and Spanish citizens on science issues such as vaccines and climate change expressed by the citizens participating in the public consultations held in València (Spain) and Łódź (Poland) during the autumn of 2019. As the general elections were held very close to the public consultations in both countries, it was expected that there would be references to election campaigns, political parties, or public policymaking during the debates. Then, those statements explicitly expressing political views on climate change and vaccines were selected from the debate transcripts before applying five specific frames and variables for analysis and interpretation. The results show that more political opinions were expressed in the debates on climate change than on vaccines. Moreover, the citizens' views on the science-politics dichotomy mainly were negative, with the men mixing science with politics more than the women.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Placing Portuguese Right-Wing Populism Into Context Citizens' Political Discourses on Climate Change and Vaccines Will Live Streaming Platforms and Influencers Consolidate or Disrupt Democracy? Citizens, Polarization, and the Pandemic in the Italian Hybrid News Media System Populism, Its Prevalence, and Its Negative Influence on Democratic Institutions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1