战略管理学派比较研究(规定性、描述性和综合性)

Farid Ahmad Monib, Jamaluddin Qanet, Mohammad Dawod Nabeel, Redwanullah Abdi
{"title":"战略管理学派比较研究(规定性、描述性和综合性)","authors":"Farid Ahmad Monib, Jamaluddin Qanet, Mohammad Dawod Nabeel, Redwanullah Abdi","doi":"10.4236/ojbm.2021.94106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article seeks to compare the schools of strategic management in \nthree paradigms, especially descriptive and descriptive schools, and considers \nthe integrated schools of strategic management as a combination of the other \ntwo types of schools. In this article, to achieve this goal, we first try to \nexplain the concepts of strategic management, model, theory, approach, school \nand paradigm and schools of strategic management. Then, using the qualitative \ncomparative research method and the type of close comparison, the researcher \ncame to the conclusion that the schools of strategic management are not \nincomplete. They are complementary and it is necessary to use each of them in organizations. Then, we will compare the \nrelationship between these concepts, especially the concepts of \nstrategic management and strategic planning, with schools of learning and \nplanning, and finally we will find out. The prescriptive \nand descriptive schools are complementary and supportive according to the \nintegrated schools.","PeriodicalId":411102,"journal":{"name":"Open Journal of Business and Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Study of Strategic Management Schools (Prescriptive, Descriptive and Integrated)\",\"authors\":\"Farid Ahmad Monib, Jamaluddin Qanet, Mohammad Dawod Nabeel, Redwanullah Abdi\",\"doi\":\"10.4236/ojbm.2021.94106\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article seeks to compare the schools of strategic management in \\nthree paradigms, especially descriptive and descriptive schools, and considers \\nthe integrated schools of strategic management as a combination of the other \\ntwo types of schools. In this article, to achieve this goal, we first try to \\nexplain the concepts of strategic management, model, theory, approach, school \\nand paradigm and schools of strategic management. Then, using the qualitative \\ncomparative research method and the type of close comparison, the researcher \\ncame to the conclusion that the schools of strategic management are not \\nincomplete. They are complementary and it is necessary to use each of them in organizations. Then, we will compare the \\nrelationship between these concepts, especially the concepts of \\nstrategic management and strategic planning, with schools of learning and \\nplanning, and finally we will find out. The prescriptive \\nand descriptive schools are complementary and supportive according to the \\nintegrated schools.\",\"PeriodicalId\":411102,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Journal of Business and Management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Journal of Business and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4236/ojbm.2021.94106\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Journal of Business and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/ojbm.2021.94106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文试图在三种范式下对战略管理学派进行比较,特别是描述性学派和描述性学派,并将综合型战略管理学派视为其他两种学派的结合。在本文中,为了实现这一目标,我们首先尝试解释战略管理的概念、模式、理论、方法、学派和范式以及战略管理学派。然后,运用定性比较研究方法和近比法,得出战略管理学派并非不完整的结论。它们是互补的,有必要在组织中使用它们中的每一个。然后,我们将这些概念,特别是战略管理和战略规划的概念,与学习和规划的学校之间的关系进行比较,最后我们会发现。规定性学校和描述性学校相对于综合学校是互补和支持的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative Study of Strategic Management Schools (Prescriptive, Descriptive and Integrated)
This article seeks to compare the schools of strategic management in three paradigms, especially descriptive and descriptive schools, and considers the integrated schools of strategic management as a combination of the other two types of schools. In this article, to achieve this goal, we first try to explain the concepts of strategic management, model, theory, approach, school and paradigm and schools of strategic management. Then, using the qualitative comparative research method and the type of close comparison, the researcher came to the conclusion that the schools of strategic management are not incomplete. They are complementary and it is necessary to use each of them in organizations. Then, we will compare the relationship between these concepts, especially the concepts of strategic management and strategic planning, with schools of learning and planning, and finally we will find out. The prescriptive and descriptive schools are complementary and supportive according to the integrated schools.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Analysis of the Recovery Path of the Consumer Sector in the Post-Pandemic Era An Analysis of the Recovery Path of the Consumer Sector in the Post-Pandemic Era The Effect of Employee Engagement on Employee Performance in Ghana’s MSMEs Sector during COVID-19: The Moderating Role of Job Resources Management Share Proprietory and Firm Value: Are There Peculiar Determinants? Historical Perspectives and the Emergence of the Sustainability Concept in Organizations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1