重新审视新手程序员的表现和他们老师的期望

I. Utting, Allison Elliott Tew, M. McCracken, L. Thomas, D. Bouvier, R. Frye, James H. Paterson, M. Caspersen, Y. Kolikant, Juha Sorva, Tadeusz Wilusz
{"title":"重新审视新手程序员的表现和他们老师的期望","authors":"I. Utting, Allison Elliott Tew, M. McCracken, L. Thomas, D. Bouvier, R. Frye, James H. Paterson, M. Caspersen, Y. Kolikant, Juha Sorva, Tadeusz Wilusz","doi":"10.1145/2543882.2543884","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper describes the results of an ITiCSE working group convened in 2013 to review and revisit the influential ITiCSE 2001 McCracken working group that reported [18] on novice programmers' ability to solve a specified programming problem. Like that study, the one described here asked students to implement a simple program. Unlike the original study, students' in this study were given significant scaffolding for their efforts, including a test harness. Their knowledge of programming concepts was also assessed via a standard language-neutral survey.\n One of the significant findings of the original working group was that students were less successful at the programming task than their teachers expected, so in this study teachers' expectations were explicitly gathered and matched with students' performance. This study found a significant correlation between students' performance in the practical task and the survey, and a significant effect on performance in the practical task attributable to the use of the test harness. The study also found a much better correlation between teachers' expectations of their students' performance than in the 2001 working group.","PeriodicalId":387713,"journal":{"name":"ITiCSE -WGR '13","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"81","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A fresh look at novice programmers' performance and their teachers' expectations\",\"authors\":\"I. Utting, Allison Elliott Tew, M. McCracken, L. Thomas, D. Bouvier, R. Frye, James H. Paterson, M. Caspersen, Y. Kolikant, Juha Sorva, Tadeusz Wilusz\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2543882.2543884\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper describes the results of an ITiCSE working group convened in 2013 to review and revisit the influential ITiCSE 2001 McCracken working group that reported [18] on novice programmers' ability to solve a specified programming problem. Like that study, the one described here asked students to implement a simple program. Unlike the original study, students' in this study were given significant scaffolding for their efforts, including a test harness. Their knowledge of programming concepts was also assessed via a standard language-neutral survey.\\n One of the significant findings of the original working group was that students were less successful at the programming task than their teachers expected, so in this study teachers' expectations were explicitly gathered and matched with students' performance. This study found a significant correlation between students' performance in the practical task and the survey, and a significant effect on performance in the practical task attributable to the use of the test harness. The study also found a much better correlation between teachers' expectations of their students' performance than in the 2001 working group.\",\"PeriodicalId\":387713,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ITiCSE -WGR '13\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"81\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ITiCSE -WGR '13\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2543882.2543884\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ITiCSE -WGR '13","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2543882.2543884","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 81

摘要

本文描述了2013年召开的ITiCSE工作组的结果,该工作组审查并重新审视了有影响力的ITiCSE 2001 McCracken工作组,该工作组报告了新手程序员解决特定编程问题的能力。和那个研究一样,这里描述的研究要求学生执行一个简单的程序。与最初的研究不同,在这项研究中,学生们为他们的努力提供了重要的脚手架,包括一个测试装置。他们的编程概念知识也通过标准的语言中立调查进行评估。最初工作组的一个重要发现是,学生在编程任务上的成功程度低于教师的预期,因此在本研究中,教师的期望被明确地收集起来,并与学生的表现相匹配。本研究发现,学生在实际任务中的表现与调查之间存在显著的相关性,并且使用测试套件对实际任务中的表现有显著的影响。该研究还发现,与2001年的工作小组相比,教师对学生表现的期望之间的相关性要好得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A fresh look at novice programmers' performance and their teachers' expectations
This paper describes the results of an ITiCSE working group convened in 2013 to review and revisit the influential ITiCSE 2001 McCracken working group that reported [18] on novice programmers' ability to solve a specified programming problem. Like that study, the one described here asked students to implement a simple program. Unlike the original study, students' in this study were given significant scaffolding for their efforts, including a test harness. Their knowledge of programming concepts was also assessed via a standard language-neutral survey. One of the significant findings of the original working group was that students were less successful at the programming task than their teachers expected, so in this study teachers' expectations were explicitly gathered and matched with students' performance. This study found a significant correlation between students' performance in the practical task and the survey, and a significant effect on performance in the practical task attributable to the use of the test harness. The study also found a much better correlation between teachers' expectations of their students' performance than in the 2001 working group.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Canterbury QuestionBank: building a repository of multiple-choice CS1 and CS2 questions A fresh look at novice programmers' performance and their teachers' expectations Cybersecurity, women and minorities: findings and recommendations from a preliminary investigation Requirements and design strategies for open source interactive computer science eBooks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1