{"title":"罗蒂对论证的回避:对修辞的重新描述","authors":"Janet S. Horne","doi":"10.1080/10417949309372899","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay offers an application of Richard Rorty's anti‐foundationalist pragmatism to critique some contemporary work in rhetorical theory, criticism, and philosophy of rhetoric. The critique is based on Rorty's strategy of de‐privileging argument as the foundation for espistemology, and proposes a tropological rhetoric as an alternative to epistemological rhetoric. The essay focuses on redescription as the critical function of tropological rhetoric and as a means of social and political action.","PeriodicalId":212800,"journal":{"name":"Southern Journal of Communication","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rorty's circumvention of argument: Redescribing rhetoric\",\"authors\":\"Janet S. Horne\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10417949309372899\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This essay offers an application of Richard Rorty's anti‐foundationalist pragmatism to critique some contemporary work in rhetorical theory, criticism, and philosophy of rhetoric. The critique is based on Rorty's strategy of de‐privileging argument as the foundation for espistemology, and proposes a tropological rhetoric as an alternative to epistemological rhetoric. The essay focuses on redescription as the critical function of tropological rhetoric and as a means of social and political action.\",\"PeriodicalId\":212800,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Southern Journal of Communication\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1993-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Southern Journal of Communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10417949309372899\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern Journal of Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10417949309372899","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Rorty's circumvention of argument: Redescribing rhetoric
This essay offers an application of Richard Rorty's anti‐foundationalist pragmatism to critique some contemporary work in rhetorical theory, criticism, and philosophy of rhetoric. The critique is based on Rorty's strategy of de‐privileging argument as the foundation for espistemology, and proposes a tropological rhetoric as an alternative to epistemological rhetoric. The essay focuses on redescription as the critical function of tropological rhetoric and as a means of social and political action.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
