通过三角位移地理掩蔽法保护患者地理隐私

Abdullah Murad, Brian N. Hilton, T. Horan, John Tangenberg
{"title":"通过三角位移地理掩蔽法保护患者地理隐私","authors":"Abdullah Murad, Brian N. Hilton, T. Horan, John Tangenberg","doi":"10.1145/2675682.2676399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Protecting patient geo-privacy while allowing for valid geographic analyses of the data is a major challenge [1]. As a consequence, a variety of methods have been introduced to mask patients' locational information, also called geo-masking methods [2]. This study assessed the five main geo-masking methods as cited by [3] in terms of re-identification risk and performance. These five methods are Random Direction and Fixed Radius, Random Perturbation within a Circle, Gaussian Displacement, Donut Masking, and Bimodal Gaussian Displacement. Based on the assessment, the study highlighted two major gaps in the design of these geo-masking methods. First, all five geo-masking methods used only population density in calculating the displacement distances between the original locations of points and their new locations. However, other criteria that might be as important as population density were not considered in designing these five methods. These include data sensitivity, research types, quasi-indicator availability, previously generated maps availability, end-users' types, and the possibility of temporal synergy of data. Second, the Donut Masking and the Bimodal Gaussian Displacement methods were found to be superior in terms of minimizing re-identifying risks, but they were also found to be consuming much more processing power compared to the other three geo-masking methods. To address these gaps, this study proposed a new geo-masking method, called the \"Triangular Displacement\". The primary design, development, and evaluation of the Triangular Displacement method were based on the Design Science Research (DSR) Process Model [4], also known as DSRM. The expected next step is to implement the resultant geo-masking method as a tool to help healthcare data guardians de-identify large sets of PHR automatically. A pilot study with a large Southern Californian healthcare provider has been outlined to examine the efficacy of the developed solution.","PeriodicalId":337858,"journal":{"name":"GeoPrivacy '14","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Protecting patient geo-privacy via a triangular displacement geo-masking method\",\"authors\":\"Abdullah Murad, Brian N. Hilton, T. Horan, John Tangenberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2675682.2676399\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Protecting patient geo-privacy while allowing for valid geographic analyses of the data is a major challenge [1]. As a consequence, a variety of methods have been introduced to mask patients' locational information, also called geo-masking methods [2]. This study assessed the five main geo-masking methods as cited by [3] in terms of re-identification risk and performance. These five methods are Random Direction and Fixed Radius, Random Perturbation within a Circle, Gaussian Displacement, Donut Masking, and Bimodal Gaussian Displacement. Based on the assessment, the study highlighted two major gaps in the design of these geo-masking methods. First, all five geo-masking methods used only population density in calculating the displacement distances between the original locations of points and their new locations. However, other criteria that might be as important as population density were not considered in designing these five methods. These include data sensitivity, research types, quasi-indicator availability, previously generated maps availability, end-users' types, and the possibility of temporal synergy of data. Second, the Donut Masking and the Bimodal Gaussian Displacement methods were found to be superior in terms of minimizing re-identifying risks, but they were also found to be consuming much more processing power compared to the other three geo-masking methods. To address these gaps, this study proposed a new geo-masking method, called the \\\"Triangular Displacement\\\". The primary design, development, and evaluation of the Triangular Displacement method were based on the Design Science Research (DSR) Process Model [4], also known as DSRM. The expected next step is to implement the resultant geo-masking method as a tool to help healthcare data guardians de-identify large sets of PHR automatically. A pilot study with a large Southern Californian healthcare provider has been outlined to examine the efficacy of the developed solution.\",\"PeriodicalId\":337858,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"GeoPrivacy '14\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"GeoPrivacy '14\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2675682.2676399\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GeoPrivacy '14","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2675682.2676399","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

在允许对数据进行有效地理分析的同时保护患者地理隐私是一项重大挑战[1]。因此,人们引入了各种方法来掩盖患者的位置信息,也称为地理掩蔽方法[2]。本研究从重新识别风险和性能方面评估了[3]引用的五种主要地理掩蔽方法。这五种方法分别是随机方向和固定半径、圆内随机摄动、高斯位移、甜甜圈掩蔽和双峰高斯位移。基于评估,该研究突出了这些地理掩蔽方法设计中的两个主要缺陷。首先,所有五种地理掩蔽方法在计算点的原始位置和它们的新位置之间的位移距离时只使用人口密度。然而,在设计这五种方法时,没有考虑到可能与人口密度同样重要的其他标准。这些因素包括数据敏感性、研究类型、准指标可用性、以前生成的地图可用性、最终用户类型以及数据时间协同的可能性。其次,甜甜圈掩蔽和双峰高斯位移方法被发现在最小化重新识别风险方面更优越,但与其他三种地理掩蔽方法相比,它们也被发现消耗更多的处理能力。为了解决这些差距,本研究提出了一种新的地理掩蔽方法,称为“三角位移”。三角位移法的初步设计、开发和评估基于设计科学研究(DSR)过程模型[4],也称为DSRM。预期的下一步是将生成的地理屏蔽方法作为一种工具来实现,以帮助医疗保健数据监护人自动去除大量PHR的标识。已经概述了与南加州一家大型医疗保健提供商合作进行的一项试点研究,以检查开发的解决方案的功效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Protecting patient geo-privacy via a triangular displacement geo-masking method
Protecting patient geo-privacy while allowing for valid geographic analyses of the data is a major challenge [1]. As a consequence, a variety of methods have been introduced to mask patients' locational information, also called geo-masking methods [2]. This study assessed the five main geo-masking methods as cited by [3] in terms of re-identification risk and performance. These five methods are Random Direction and Fixed Radius, Random Perturbation within a Circle, Gaussian Displacement, Donut Masking, and Bimodal Gaussian Displacement. Based on the assessment, the study highlighted two major gaps in the design of these geo-masking methods. First, all five geo-masking methods used only population density in calculating the displacement distances between the original locations of points and their new locations. However, other criteria that might be as important as population density were not considered in designing these five methods. These include data sensitivity, research types, quasi-indicator availability, previously generated maps availability, end-users' types, and the possibility of temporal synergy of data. Second, the Donut Masking and the Bimodal Gaussian Displacement methods were found to be superior in terms of minimizing re-identifying risks, but they were also found to be consuming much more processing power compared to the other three geo-masking methods. To address these gaps, this study proposed a new geo-masking method, called the "Triangular Displacement". The primary design, development, and evaluation of the Triangular Displacement method were based on the Design Science Research (DSR) Process Model [4], also known as DSRM. The expected next step is to implement the resultant geo-masking method as a tool to help healthcare data guardians de-identify large sets of PHR automatically. A pilot study with a large Southern Californian healthcare provider has been outlined to examine the efficacy of the developed solution.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Quantity based aggregation for cadastral databases Protecting patient geo-privacy via a triangular displacement geo-masking method A grid-based location privacy-preserving method for LBS users A civilized cyberspace for geoprivacy A spatial entropy-based approach to improve mobile risk-based authentication
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1