{"title":"基于敲门器的阀门粘滞补偿方法的比较研究","authors":"S. El-Ferik, Mohamed A. Hassan, Mustafa Al-Naser","doi":"10.1109/SPC.2018.8704129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Control valve stiction is one of the common issues in industrial plant leading to poor control loops performance. Knocker based methods is one of common stiction compensation approaches. In this paper, a detailed comparison is held among three knocker based methods. Ideal compensator criteria proposed by Srinivasan and Rengaswamy is used to perform the comparison between three methods using MATLAB simulation and experimental setup.","PeriodicalId":432464,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE Conference on Systems, Process and Control (ICSPC)","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Study of Valve Stiction Compensation: Knocker Based Methods\",\"authors\":\"S. El-Ferik, Mohamed A. Hassan, Mustafa Al-Naser\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SPC.2018.8704129\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Control valve stiction is one of the common issues in industrial plant leading to poor control loops performance. Knocker based methods is one of common stiction compensation approaches. In this paper, a detailed comparison is held among three knocker based methods. Ideal compensator criteria proposed by Srinivasan and Rengaswamy is used to perform the comparison between three methods using MATLAB simulation and experimental setup.\",\"PeriodicalId\":432464,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 IEEE Conference on Systems, Process and Control (ICSPC)\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 IEEE Conference on Systems, Process and Control (ICSPC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SPC.2018.8704129\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE Conference on Systems, Process and Control (ICSPC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SPC.2018.8704129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Comparative Study of Valve Stiction Compensation: Knocker Based Methods
Control valve stiction is one of the common issues in industrial plant leading to poor control loops performance. Knocker based methods is one of common stiction compensation approaches. In this paper, a detailed comparison is held among three knocker based methods. Ideal compensator criteria proposed by Srinivasan and Rengaswamy is used to perform the comparison between three methods using MATLAB simulation and experimental setup.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
