利用Logistic回归与随机森林对信用卡欺诈检测提高预测精度的比较分析

M. Krishna, J. Praveenchandar
{"title":"利用Logistic回归与随机森林对信用卡欺诈检测提高预测精度的比较分析","authors":"M. Krishna, J. Praveenchandar","doi":"10.1109/ICECAA55415.2022.9936488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study aims to identify the frauds committed using a payment card such as credit cards, debit cards, and also an experiment is performed to find the best suitable algorithm among Random forest and Logistic Regression. Materials and Methods: To stop the fraud detections using Random forest (N=10) and Logistic regression (N=10) with supervised learning that gives insights from the previous data. Results: The precision of the random forest is 76.29% compared with Logistic regression with accuracy of 74.65% with statistical significance value p=0.03 (p<0.05) using Independent sample t test. Conclusion: This results proved that Random forest was significantly better for Fraud detection than Logistic regression within the study’s limits.","PeriodicalId":273850,"journal":{"name":"2022 International Conference on Edge Computing and Applications (ICECAA)","volume":"167 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Analysis of Credit Card Fraud Detection using Logistic regression with Random Forest towards an Increase in Accuracy of Prediction\",\"authors\":\"M. Krishna, J. Praveenchandar\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICECAA55415.2022.9936488\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study aims to identify the frauds committed using a payment card such as credit cards, debit cards, and also an experiment is performed to find the best suitable algorithm among Random forest and Logistic Regression. Materials and Methods: To stop the fraud detections using Random forest (N=10) and Logistic regression (N=10) with supervised learning that gives insights from the previous data. Results: The precision of the random forest is 76.29% compared with Logistic regression with accuracy of 74.65% with statistical significance value p=0.03 (p<0.05) using Independent sample t test. Conclusion: This results proved that Random forest was significantly better for Fraud detection than Logistic regression within the study’s limits.\",\"PeriodicalId\":273850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 International Conference on Edge Computing and Applications (ICECAA)\",\"volume\":\"167 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 International Conference on Edge Computing and Applications (ICECAA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICECAA55415.2022.9936488\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 International Conference on Edge Computing and Applications (ICECAA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICECAA55415.2022.9936488","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

本研究旨在识别信用卡、借记卡等支付卡的欺诈行为,并通过实验在随机森林和逻辑回归中找到最合适的算法。材料和方法:使用随机森林(N=10)和逻辑回归(N=10)与监督学习(从先前的数据中获得见解)来停止欺诈检测。结果:采用独立样本t检验,与Logistic回归相比,随机森林的准确率为76.29%,准确率为74.65%,p=0.03 (p<0.05)。结论:在研究范围内,随机森林的欺诈检测效果明显优于Logistic回归。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative Analysis of Credit Card Fraud Detection using Logistic regression with Random Forest towards an Increase in Accuracy of Prediction
The study aims to identify the frauds committed using a payment card such as credit cards, debit cards, and also an experiment is performed to find the best suitable algorithm among Random forest and Logistic Regression. Materials and Methods: To stop the fraud detections using Random forest (N=10) and Logistic regression (N=10) with supervised learning that gives insights from the previous data. Results: The precision of the random forest is 76.29% compared with Logistic regression with accuracy of 74.65% with statistical significance value p=0.03 (p<0.05) using Independent sample t test. Conclusion: This results proved that Random forest was significantly better for Fraud detection than Logistic regression within the study’s limits.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Identification of IT Tickets and Bugs using Text-Supervised Pedagogical Approaches Application of Computer CAD Software Optimization in the Manufacture of Mechanical Reducer Considering Artificial Intelligence Auxiliary Decision-Making System for College Curriculum Construction based on Big Data Technology Pest Identification and Control using Deep Learning and Augmented Reality Internet of Things-based Personal Private Server Computing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1