{"title":"健康作为一项可强制执行的积极权利:巴西最高联邦法院关于获得药品的判例法","authors":"I. Sarlet, M. F. Figueirêdo","doi":"10.5771/2193-7869-2019-2-117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to present and discuss how the right to health has been considered a fundamental right and duty in the Brazilian constitutional order, in particular as a positive enforceable entitlement. The main purpose is to analyze - in light of the example of medicines - the role of the Brazilian Supreme Federal Court regarding the effectiveness of the right to health, and to present a discussion about proper criteria to justify judicial decisions in this domain.","PeriodicalId":275616,"journal":{"name":"Kritische Vierteljahresschrift für Gesetzgebung und Rechtswissenschaft","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Health as an enforceable positive right: the Brazilian Supreme Federal Court’s case law on the access to medicines\",\"authors\":\"I. Sarlet, M. F. Figueirêdo\",\"doi\":\"10.5771/2193-7869-2019-2-117\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper aims to present and discuss how the right to health has been considered a fundamental right and duty in the Brazilian constitutional order, in particular as a positive enforceable entitlement. The main purpose is to analyze - in light of the example of medicines - the role of the Brazilian Supreme Federal Court regarding the effectiveness of the right to health, and to present a discussion about proper criteria to justify judicial decisions in this domain.\",\"PeriodicalId\":275616,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kritische Vierteljahresschrift für Gesetzgebung und Rechtswissenschaft\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kritische Vierteljahresschrift für Gesetzgebung und Rechtswissenschaft\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5771/2193-7869-2019-2-117\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kritische Vierteljahresschrift für Gesetzgebung und Rechtswissenschaft","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5771/2193-7869-2019-2-117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Health as an enforceable positive right: the Brazilian Supreme Federal Court’s case law on the access to medicines
This paper aims to present and discuss how the right to health has been considered a fundamental right and duty in the Brazilian constitutional order, in particular as a positive enforceable entitlement. The main purpose is to analyze - in light of the example of medicines - the role of the Brazilian Supreme Federal Court regarding the effectiveness of the right to health, and to present a discussion about proper criteria to justify judicial decisions in this domain.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
