根据ISO 26262计算硬件故障度量的量化故障树技术

Nabarun Das, W. Taylor
{"title":"根据ISO 26262计算硬件故障度量的量化故障树技术","authors":"Nabarun Das, W. Taylor","doi":"10.1109/ISPCE.2016.7492848","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since its introduction in 2011, the ISO 26262 standard has provided the state-of-the-art methodology for achieving functional safety of automotive electrical and electronic systems. Among other requirements, the standard requires estimation of quantified metrics such as the Probabilistic Metric for Hardware Failure (PMHF) using quantitative failure analysis techniques. While the standard provides some brief guidance, a complete methodology to calculate the PMHF in detail has not been well described in literature. This paper will draw out several key frameworks for successfully calculating the probabilistic metric for hardware failure using Fault Tree Analysis (FTA). At the top levels of the analysis, methods drawn from previous literature can be used to organize potential failures within a complex multifunctional system. At the lower levels of the FTA, the effects of all fault categories, including dual-point latent and detected faults, can be accounted for using appropriate diagnostic coverage and proof-test interval times. A simple example is developed throughout the paper to demonstrate the methods. Some simplifications are proposed to estimate an upper bound on the PMHF. Conclusions are drawn related to the steps and methods employed, and the nature of PMHF calculation in practical real-world systems.","PeriodicalId":107512,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE Symposium on Product Compliance Engineering (ISPCE)","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantified fault tree techniques for calculating hardware fault metrics according to ISO 26262\",\"authors\":\"Nabarun Das, W. Taylor\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISPCE.2016.7492848\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Since its introduction in 2011, the ISO 26262 standard has provided the state-of-the-art methodology for achieving functional safety of automotive electrical and electronic systems. Among other requirements, the standard requires estimation of quantified metrics such as the Probabilistic Metric for Hardware Failure (PMHF) using quantitative failure analysis techniques. While the standard provides some brief guidance, a complete methodology to calculate the PMHF in detail has not been well described in literature. This paper will draw out several key frameworks for successfully calculating the probabilistic metric for hardware failure using Fault Tree Analysis (FTA). At the top levels of the analysis, methods drawn from previous literature can be used to organize potential failures within a complex multifunctional system. At the lower levels of the FTA, the effects of all fault categories, including dual-point latent and detected faults, can be accounted for using appropriate diagnostic coverage and proof-test interval times. A simple example is developed throughout the paper to demonstrate the methods. Some simplifications are proposed to estimate an upper bound on the PMHF. Conclusions are drawn related to the steps and methods employed, and the nature of PMHF calculation in practical real-world systems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":107512,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 IEEE Symposium on Product Compliance Engineering (ISPCE)\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 IEEE Symposium on Product Compliance Engineering (ISPCE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISPCE.2016.7492848\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE Symposium on Product Compliance Engineering (ISPCE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISPCE.2016.7492848","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

摘要

自2011年推出以来,ISO 26262标准为实现汽车电气和电子系统的功能安全提供了最先进的方法。在其他需求中,该标准要求使用定量故障分析技术对量化度量进行估计,例如硬件故障概率度量(PMHF)。虽然该标准提供了一些简短的指导,但文献中尚未详细描述计算PMHF的完整方法。本文将利用故障树分析(FTA)成功计算硬件故障概率度量的几个关键框架。在分析的顶层,从以前的文献中提取的方法可以用来组织复杂的多功能系统中的潜在故障。在FTA的较低级别,所有故障类别的影响,包括双点潜在故障和检测到的故障,都可以使用适当的诊断覆盖率和证明测试间隔时间来解释。本文通过一个简单的例子来说明这些方法。提出了一些简化方法来估计PMHF的上界。得出的结论与所采用的步骤和方法有关,以及实际世界系统中PMHF计算的性质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Quantified fault tree techniques for calculating hardware fault metrics according to ISO 26262
Since its introduction in 2011, the ISO 26262 standard has provided the state-of-the-art methodology for achieving functional safety of automotive electrical and electronic systems. Among other requirements, the standard requires estimation of quantified metrics such as the Probabilistic Metric for Hardware Failure (PMHF) using quantitative failure analysis techniques. While the standard provides some brief guidance, a complete methodology to calculate the PMHF in detail has not been well described in literature. This paper will draw out several key frameworks for successfully calculating the probabilistic metric for hardware failure using Fault Tree Analysis (FTA). At the top levels of the analysis, methods drawn from previous literature can be used to organize potential failures within a complex multifunctional system. At the lower levels of the FTA, the effects of all fault categories, including dual-point latent and detected faults, can be accounted for using appropriate diagnostic coverage and proof-test interval times. A simple example is developed throughout the paper to demonstrate the methods. Some simplifications are proposed to estimate an upper bound on the PMHF. Conclusions are drawn related to the steps and methods employed, and the nature of PMHF calculation in practical real-world systems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Quantified fault tree techniques for calculating hardware fault metrics according to ISO 26262 Preventing potential fires and hazardous situations in consumer products Product safety testing using induced corona detection Self-authentication in medical device software: An approach to include cybersecurity in legacy medical devices Model name strategy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1