AA2198 Al-Cu-Li各向异性再结晶合金在T3和T8条件下的比例加载和非比例加载的塑性和延性:模拟和实验

X. Kong, Jianqiang Chen, Y. Madi, D. Missoum-Benziane, J. Besson, T. Morgeneyer
{"title":"AA2198 Al-Cu-Li各向异性再结晶合金在T3和T8条件下的比例加载和非比例加载的塑性和延性:模拟和实验","authors":"X. Kong, Jianqiang Chen, Y. Madi, D. Missoum-Benziane, J. Besson, T. Morgeneyer","doi":"10.46298/jtcam.8913","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The anisotropic material behaviour of a recrystallized AA2198 Al-Cu-Li alloy in T3 and T8 conditions was assessed by proportional loading of uniaxial-tension specimens in rolling (L), transverse (T) and diagonal (D) orientations. The width and longitudinal strains were measured to quantify plastic anisotropy. Notched-tension samples were tested in L and T directions. The material showed weak anisotropy in terms of stress strain curves and a moderate plastic anisotropy, consistent with its texture obtained by EBSD. An anisotropic Bron-Besson type material model was identified using this data base and a micro shear-only (SO) test. The model succeeded in predicting the behaviour of micro specimens for proportional tension-only (TO) loading and non-proportional load path changes including 'shear to tension' (ST) as well as 'tension to shear' (TS) tests. The non-proportional loading was achieved using a newly designed cross shaped sample. It was loaded in one direction, unloaded and subsequently loaded in the orthogonal direction till fracture. The average stretch to fracture of both alloys measured by a four point frame optical extensometer decreased by 29 % and 16 % for T3 and T8 respectively for the 'shear to tension' experiment compared to the proportional TO experiment. The average stretch to fracture of 'tension to shear' tests was reduced by 10 % for 2198T3 and hardly reduced for 2198T8 compared to the stretch to fracture of the SO tests, but subject to strong scatter. FE simulations showed local accumulated strain to fracture values that were similar for all loading histories for the T8 condition (0.73 − 0.84). Lower strain to fracture values were found in T3 condition (0.45 − 0.73), despite the enhanced macroscopic ductility in tension. This was attributed to larger less localized plastic zones, especially for the ST test. The ductility scatter was attributed to necking and damage development in tension that can affect strain localization, associated fracture path and ductility, as observed by DIC and fractography.","PeriodicalId":115014,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Theoretical, Computational and Applied Mechanics","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Plasticity and ductility of an anisotropic recrystallized AA2198 Al-Cu-Li alloy in T3 and T8 conditions during proportional and non-proportional loading paths: simulations and experiments\",\"authors\":\"X. Kong, Jianqiang Chen, Y. Madi, D. Missoum-Benziane, J. Besson, T. Morgeneyer\",\"doi\":\"10.46298/jtcam.8913\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The anisotropic material behaviour of a recrystallized AA2198 Al-Cu-Li alloy in T3 and T8 conditions was assessed by proportional loading of uniaxial-tension specimens in rolling (L), transverse (T) and diagonal (D) orientations. The width and longitudinal strains were measured to quantify plastic anisotropy. Notched-tension samples were tested in L and T directions. The material showed weak anisotropy in terms of stress strain curves and a moderate plastic anisotropy, consistent with its texture obtained by EBSD. An anisotropic Bron-Besson type material model was identified using this data base and a micro shear-only (SO) test. The model succeeded in predicting the behaviour of micro specimens for proportional tension-only (TO) loading and non-proportional load path changes including 'shear to tension' (ST) as well as 'tension to shear' (TS) tests. The non-proportional loading was achieved using a newly designed cross shaped sample. It was loaded in one direction, unloaded and subsequently loaded in the orthogonal direction till fracture. The average stretch to fracture of both alloys measured by a four point frame optical extensometer decreased by 29 % and 16 % for T3 and T8 respectively for the 'shear to tension' experiment compared to the proportional TO experiment. The average stretch to fracture of 'tension to shear' tests was reduced by 10 % for 2198T3 and hardly reduced for 2198T8 compared to the stretch to fracture of the SO tests, but subject to strong scatter. FE simulations showed local accumulated strain to fracture values that were similar for all loading histories for the T8 condition (0.73 − 0.84). Lower strain to fracture values were found in T3 condition (0.45 − 0.73), despite the enhanced macroscopic ductility in tension. This was attributed to larger less localized plastic zones, especially for the ST test. The ductility scatter was attributed to necking and damage development in tension that can affect strain localization, associated fracture path and ductility, as observed by DIC and fractography.\",\"PeriodicalId\":115014,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Theoretical, Computational and Applied Mechanics\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Theoretical, Computational and Applied Mechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46298/jtcam.8913\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Theoretical, Computational and Applied Mechanics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46298/jtcam.8913","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

通过按比例加载轧制(L)、横向(T)和对角(D)方向的单轴拉伸试样,研究了再结晶AA2198 Al-Cu-Li合金在T3和T8条件下的各向异性材料行为。测量了宽度应变和纵向应变,量化了塑性各向异性。缺口拉伸试样在L和T方向上进行了测试。材料在应力应变曲线上表现出弱的各向异性和中等的塑性各向异性,与EBSD得到的织构一致。利用该数据库和微剪切(SO)试验确定了各向异性的brown - besson型材料模型。该模型成功地预测了仅比例拉伸(TO)加载和非比例加载路径变化(包括“剪切到张力”(ST)以及“张力到剪切”(TS)测试)下微试件的行为。采用新设计的十字形试样实现了非比例加载。在一个方向加载,卸载,然后在正交方向加载,直到断裂。在“剪切-拉伸”实验中,用四点框架光学伸长仪测量的两种合金在T3和T8的平均拉伸-断裂比比例to实验分别下降了29%和16%。与SO试验的拉伸到断裂相比,“拉伸到剪切”试验的平均拉伸到断裂减少了2198T3的10%,而2198T8几乎没有减少,但受到强散射的影响。有限元模拟显示,T8条件下所有加载历史的局部累积应变与断裂值相似(0.73−0.84)。T3条件下的应变断裂值较低(0.45 ~ 0.73),尽管拉伸时的宏观延性增强。这是由于较大的非局部塑性区,特别是在ST测试中。通过DIC和断口学观察到,延性散射归因于拉伸中的颈缩和损伤发展,这会影响应变局部化、相关断裂路径和延性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Plasticity and ductility of an anisotropic recrystallized AA2198 Al-Cu-Li alloy in T3 and T8 conditions during proportional and non-proportional loading paths: simulations and experiments
The anisotropic material behaviour of a recrystallized AA2198 Al-Cu-Li alloy in T3 and T8 conditions was assessed by proportional loading of uniaxial-tension specimens in rolling (L), transverse (T) and diagonal (D) orientations. The width and longitudinal strains were measured to quantify plastic anisotropy. Notched-tension samples were tested in L and T directions. The material showed weak anisotropy in terms of stress strain curves and a moderate plastic anisotropy, consistent with its texture obtained by EBSD. An anisotropic Bron-Besson type material model was identified using this data base and a micro shear-only (SO) test. The model succeeded in predicting the behaviour of micro specimens for proportional tension-only (TO) loading and non-proportional load path changes including 'shear to tension' (ST) as well as 'tension to shear' (TS) tests. The non-proportional loading was achieved using a newly designed cross shaped sample. It was loaded in one direction, unloaded and subsequently loaded in the orthogonal direction till fracture. The average stretch to fracture of both alloys measured by a four point frame optical extensometer decreased by 29 % and 16 % for T3 and T8 respectively for the 'shear to tension' experiment compared to the proportional TO experiment. The average stretch to fracture of 'tension to shear' tests was reduced by 10 % for 2198T3 and hardly reduced for 2198T8 compared to the stretch to fracture of the SO tests, but subject to strong scatter. FE simulations showed local accumulated strain to fracture values that were similar for all loading histories for the T8 condition (0.73 − 0.84). Lower strain to fracture values were found in T3 condition (0.45 − 0.73), despite the enhanced macroscopic ductility in tension. This was attributed to larger less localized plastic zones, especially for the ST test. The ductility scatter was attributed to necking and damage development in tension that can affect strain localization, associated fracture path and ductility, as observed by DIC and fractography.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Crack branching at low tip speeds: spilling the T The average conformation tensor of inter-atomic bonds as an alternative state variable to the strain tensor: definition and first application ś the case of nanoelasticity Reduced order modeling of geometrically nonlinear rotating structures using the direct parametrisation of invariant manifolds Optimization of a dynamic absorber with nonlinear stiffness and damping for the vibration control of a floating offshore wind turbine toy model Plasticity and ductility of an anisotropic recrystallized AA2198 Al-Cu-Li alloy in T3 and T8 conditions during proportional and non-proportional loading paths: simulations and experiments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1