警察对民事交易的不当干预及受害人的救济

Daniel P. Saredau, Ujong Bassey Okpa
{"title":"警察对民事交易的不当干预及受害人的救济","authors":"Daniel P. Saredau, Ujong Bassey Okpa","doi":"10.53982/alj.2022.1001.02-j","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Though established under section 214 of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, the provisions on the functions, powers, administration, and structure of the Nigeria Police Force are as contained in the Nigeria Police Act, 2020. But, despite section 32(2) of the Police Act and section 8(2) of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act (2015) providing that a person shall not be arrested merely on a civil wrong or breach of contract, and the plethora of judicial authorities deprecating this practice, there continues to be a swash of cases in which the police meddle with civil claims. In the result, the police often, wrongly, turn itself into a debt recovery agency, an enforcer of contracts, or a forum for settling civil claims.Using doctrinal methodology and a discursive research design, this study examines the law on the issue. The study finds that there are legal remedies available for a person who feels aggrieved with police interference in civil claims. The remedies discussed are action for malicious prosecution, action for false imprisonment, fundamental rights enforcement action, and action under the Anti-torture Act. Overall, the study dissuades citizens from resort to the police for civil claims, and encourages the police to desist from wrongful interference in civil claims.","PeriodicalId":123596,"journal":{"name":"ABUAD Law Journal","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Wrongful Interference of Police in Civil Transactions and the Remedies for Aggrieved Persons\",\"authors\":\"Daniel P. Saredau, Ujong Bassey Okpa\",\"doi\":\"10.53982/alj.2022.1001.02-j\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Though established under section 214 of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, the provisions on the functions, powers, administration, and structure of the Nigeria Police Force are as contained in the Nigeria Police Act, 2020. But, despite section 32(2) of the Police Act and section 8(2) of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act (2015) providing that a person shall not be arrested merely on a civil wrong or breach of contract, and the plethora of judicial authorities deprecating this practice, there continues to be a swash of cases in which the police meddle with civil claims. In the result, the police often, wrongly, turn itself into a debt recovery agency, an enforcer of contracts, or a forum for settling civil claims.Using doctrinal methodology and a discursive research design, this study examines the law on the issue. The study finds that there are legal remedies available for a person who feels aggrieved with police interference in civil claims. The remedies discussed are action for malicious prosecution, action for false imprisonment, fundamental rights enforcement action, and action under the Anti-torture Act. Overall, the study dissuades citizens from resort to the police for civil claims, and encourages the police to desist from wrongful interference in civil claims.\",\"PeriodicalId\":123596,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ABUAD Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ABUAD Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53982/alj.2022.1001.02-j\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ABUAD Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53982/alj.2022.1001.02-j","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然尼日利亚警察部队是根据1999年《尼日利亚联邦共和国宪法》第214条设立的,但关于尼日利亚警察部队的职能、权力、管理和结构的规定载于2020年《尼日利亚警察法》。但是,尽管《警察法》第32(2)条和《刑事司法管理法》(2015)第8(2)条规定,一个人不得仅因民事错误或违反合同而被捕,而且过多的司法当局反对这种做法,但仍有大量案件中警察干预民事索赔。结果,警方往往错误地把自己变成了债务追讨机构、合同执行者或解决民事索赔的论坛。运用理论方法论和话语研究设计,本研究考察了这一问题的法律。该研究发现,对于因警察干涉民事索赔而感到委屈的人,有一些法律补救措施可供选择。所讨论的补救措施包括针对恶意起诉的行动、针对非法监禁的行动、针对基本权利的执法行动以及根据《反酷刑法》采取的行动。总体而言,该研究劝阻公民向警方提出民事索赔,并鼓励警方停止对民事索赔的不当干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Wrongful Interference of Police in Civil Transactions and the Remedies for Aggrieved Persons
Though established under section 214 of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, the provisions on the functions, powers, administration, and structure of the Nigeria Police Force are as contained in the Nigeria Police Act, 2020. But, despite section 32(2) of the Police Act and section 8(2) of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act (2015) providing that a person shall not be arrested merely on a civil wrong or breach of contract, and the plethora of judicial authorities deprecating this practice, there continues to be a swash of cases in which the police meddle with civil claims. In the result, the police often, wrongly, turn itself into a debt recovery agency, an enforcer of contracts, or a forum for settling civil claims.Using doctrinal methodology and a discursive research design, this study examines the law on the issue. The study finds that there are legal remedies available for a person who feels aggrieved with police interference in civil claims. The remedies discussed are action for malicious prosecution, action for false imprisonment, fundamental rights enforcement action, and action under the Anti-torture Act. Overall, the study dissuades citizens from resort to the police for civil claims, and encourages the police to desist from wrongful interference in civil claims.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
CRYPTO-EXCHANGES IN NIGERIA: A REVIEW OF THE REGULATORY FRAMEWORK. THE ROLE OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF INNOVATIONS IN REGENERATIVE MEDICINE. NAVIGATING THE FUTURE: ROBO-ADVISORS IN THE FINANCIAL LANDSCAPE. THE USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) IN ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY (ART): EXAMINING THE LEGAL AND ETHICAL IMPLICATIONS. EXAMINATION OF THE OWNERSHIP OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE GENERATED DOCUMENTS.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1