美、性别和在线慈善捐赠

Jooyoung Park, Keongtae Kim, Ying-yi Hong
{"title":"美、性别和在线慈善捐赠","authors":"Jooyoung Park, Keongtae Kim, Ying-yi Hong","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3405823","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The authors analyze data from a donation-based crowdfunding platform and conduct four experiments to examine effects of facial attractiveness on online charitable giving. Results show that facial attractiveness of recipients affects charitable giving only toward female recipients but not toward male recipients. Importantly, donor gender affects the direction of responses to facial attractiveness of recipients: men tend to donate more to attractive than unattractive female Results further demonstrate different mechanisms of attractiveness effects for male versus female donors: male donors are more willing to donate to attractive female recipients because of an instinctive preference for beauty. By contrast, female donors are less willing to donate to attractive female recipients because they are perceived to be less needy. By illuminating beauty effects in the context of online charitable giving, the findings provide practical implications for charities, individual recipients, and platform operators, especially regarding the disclosure of recipients’ facial images.","PeriodicalId":129815,"journal":{"name":"Microeconomics: Welfare Economics & Collective Decision-Making eJournal","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beauty, Gender, and Online Charitable Giving\",\"authors\":\"Jooyoung Park, Keongtae Kim, Ying-yi Hong\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3405823\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The authors analyze data from a donation-based crowdfunding platform and conduct four experiments to examine effects of facial attractiveness on online charitable giving. Results show that facial attractiveness of recipients affects charitable giving only toward female recipients but not toward male recipients. Importantly, donor gender affects the direction of responses to facial attractiveness of recipients: men tend to donate more to attractive than unattractive female Results further demonstrate different mechanisms of attractiveness effects for male versus female donors: male donors are more willing to donate to attractive female recipients because of an instinctive preference for beauty. By contrast, female donors are less willing to donate to attractive female recipients because they are perceived to be less needy. By illuminating beauty effects in the context of online charitable giving, the findings provide practical implications for charities, individual recipients, and platform operators, especially regarding the disclosure of recipients’ facial images.\",\"PeriodicalId\":129815,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Microeconomics: Welfare Economics & Collective Decision-Making eJournal\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Microeconomics: Welfare Economics & Collective Decision-Making eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3405823\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microeconomics: Welfare Economics & Collective Decision-Making eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3405823","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

作者分析了一个基于捐赠的众筹平台的数据,并进行了四个实验来检验面部吸引力对在线慈善捐赠的影响。结果表明,接受者的面部吸引力只影响女性接受者的慈善捐赠,而对男性接受者没有影响。重要的是,捐赠者的性别影响了接受者对面部吸引力的反应方向:男性更倾向于捐赠给有吸引力的女性,而不是没有吸引力的女性。结果进一步证明了男性和女性捐赠者对吸引力影响的不同机制:男性捐赠者更愿意捐赠给有吸引力的女性接受者,因为他们对美貌的本能偏好。相比之下,女性捐赠者不太愿意捐赠给有吸引力的女性接受者,因为她们被认为不那么需要帮助。通过阐明在线慈善捐赠背景下的美丽效应,研究结果为慈善机构、个人接受者和平台运营商提供了实际意义,特别是在披露接受者的面部图像方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Beauty, Gender, and Online Charitable Giving
The authors analyze data from a donation-based crowdfunding platform and conduct four experiments to examine effects of facial attractiveness on online charitable giving. Results show that facial attractiveness of recipients affects charitable giving only toward female recipients but not toward male recipients. Importantly, donor gender affects the direction of responses to facial attractiveness of recipients: men tend to donate more to attractive than unattractive female Results further demonstrate different mechanisms of attractiveness effects for male versus female donors: male donors are more willing to donate to attractive female recipients because of an instinctive preference for beauty. By contrast, female donors are less willing to donate to attractive female recipients because they are perceived to be less needy. By illuminating beauty effects in the context of online charitable giving, the findings provide practical implications for charities, individual recipients, and platform operators, especially regarding the disclosure of recipients’ facial images.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Opportunity and Inequality Across Generations Auctioning Corporate Bonds: A Uniform-Price under Investment Mandates The Role of Effort Cost Perception in Outcome Bias (Mis-)Perception of Inequality: Measures, Determinants, and Consequences Dynamic Resource Allocation with Cost Externality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1