非流动性选择的战略资产配置

Eric Luxenberg, Stephen P. Boyd, Mykel J. Kochenderfer, M. Beek, Wen Cao, Steven Diamond, A. Ulitsky, Kunal Menda, V. Vairavamurthy
{"title":"非流动性选择的战略资产配置","authors":"Eric Luxenberg, Stephen P. Boyd, Mykel J. Kochenderfer, M. Beek, Wen Cao, Steven Diamond, A. Ulitsky, Kunal Menda, V. Vairavamurthy","doi":"10.1145/3533271.3561769","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We address the problem of strategic asset allocation (SAA) with portfolios that include illiquid alternative asset classes. The main challenge in portfolio construction with illiquid asset classes is that we do not have direct control over our positions, as we do in liquid asset classes. Instead we can only make commitments; the position builds up over time as capital calls come in, and reduces over time as distributions occur, neither of which the investor has direct control over. The effect on positions of our commitments is subject to a delay, typically of a few years, and is also unknown or stochastic. A further challenge is the requirement that we can meet the capital calls, with very high probability, with our liquid assets. We formulate the illiquid dynamics as a random linear system, and propose a convex optimization based model predictive control (MPC) policy for allocating liquid assets and making new illiquid commitments in each period. Despite the challenges of time delay and uncertainty, we show that this policy attains performance surprisingly close to a fictional setting where we pretend the illiquid asset classes are completely liquid, and we can arbitrarily and immediately adjust our positions. In this paper we focus on the growth problem, with no external liabilities or income, but the method is readily extended to handle this case.","PeriodicalId":134888,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Third ACM International Conference on AI in Finance","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strategic Asset Allocation with Illiquid Alternatives\",\"authors\":\"Eric Luxenberg, Stephen P. Boyd, Mykel J. Kochenderfer, M. Beek, Wen Cao, Steven Diamond, A. Ulitsky, Kunal Menda, V. Vairavamurthy\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3533271.3561769\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We address the problem of strategic asset allocation (SAA) with portfolios that include illiquid alternative asset classes. The main challenge in portfolio construction with illiquid asset classes is that we do not have direct control over our positions, as we do in liquid asset classes. Instead we can only make commitments; the position builds up over time as capital calls come in, and reduces over time as distributions occur, neither of which the investor has direct control over. The effect on positions of our commitments is subject to a delay, typically of a few years, and is also unknown or stochastic. A further challenge is the requirement that we can meet the capital calls, with very high probability, with our liquid assets. We formulate the illiquid dynamics as a random linear system, and propose a convex optimization based model predictive control (MPC) policy for allocating liquid assets and making new illiquid commitments in each period. Despite the challenges of time delay and uncertainty, we show that this policy attains performance surprisingly close to a fictional setting where we pretend the illiquid asset classes are completely liquid, and we can arbitrarily and immediately adjust our positions. In this paper we focus on the growth problem, with no external liabilities or income, but the method is readily extended to handle this case.\",\"PeriodicalId\":134888,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Third ACM International Conference on AI in Finance\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Third ACM International Conference on AI in Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3533271.3561769\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Third ACM International Conference on AI in Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3533271.3561769","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

我们通过包括非流动性另类资产类别的投资组合解决战略资产配置问题。构建非流动性资产类别的投资组合面临的主要挑战是,我们不能像在流动性资产类别中那样直接控制自己的头寸。相反,我们只能做出承诺;随着时间的推移,随着资金的进入,头寸会逐渐增加,随着分配的发生,头寸会逐渐减少,这两者投资者都无法直接控制。我们的承诺对立场的影响是有延迟的,通常是几年,而且是未知的或随机的。另一个挑战是,要求我们有能力(以非常高的概率)用我们的流动资产满足资本要求。我们将非流动性动力学描述为一个随机线性系统,并提出了一种基于凸优化的模型预测控制(MPC)策略,用于分配流动资产并在每个时期做出新的非流动性承诺。尽管存在时间延迟和不确定性的挑战,但我们表明,该政策的表现惊人地接近于一个虚构的设置,在这个设置中,我们假设非流动性资产类别是完全流动的,我们可以任意地立即调整我们的头寸。在本文中,我们关注的是增长问题,没有外部负债或收入,但该方法很容易推广到处理这种情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Strategic Asset Allocation with Illiquid Alternatives
We address the problem of strategic asset allocation (SAA) with portfolios that include illiquid alternative asset classes. The main challenge in portfolio construction with illiquid asset classes is that we do not have direct control over our positions, as we do in liquid asset classes. Instead we can only make commitments; the position builds up over time as capital calls come in, and reduces over time as distributions occur, neither of which the investor has direct control over. The effect on positions of our commitments is subject to a delay, typically of a few years, and is also unknown or stochastic. A further challenge is the requirement that we can meet the capital calls, with very high probability, with our liquid assets. We formulate the illiquid dynamics as a random linear system, and propose a convex optimization based model predictive control (MPC) policy for allocating liquid assets and making new illiquid commitments in each period. Despite the challenges of time delay and uncertainty, we show that this policy attains performance surprisingly close to a fictional setting where we pretend the illiquid asset classes are completely liquid, and we can arbitrarily and immediately adjust our positions. In this paper we focus on the growth problem, with no external liabilities or income, but the method is readily extended to handle this case.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Core Matrix Regression and Prediction with Regularization Risk-Aware Linear Bandits with Application in Smart Order Routing Addressing Extreme Market Responses Using Secure Aggregation Addressing Non-Stationarity in FX Trading with Online Model Selection of Offline RL Experts Objective Driven Portfolio Construction Using Reinforcement Learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1