{"title":"为了正义:民事案件中的人权与律师权利","authors":"Martha F. Davis","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.968473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This report examines the international human rights treaties binding on the United States as well as other non-binding international human rights documents to ascertain the status of the right to counsel in civil cases, the so-called \"Civil Gideon\" right. The United Nations treaty monitoring bodies responsible for the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination have both indicated that legal assistance may be required to ensure fairness in civil cases. The Charter of the Organization of American States, to which the United States is a party, goes farther and contains an explicit right to \"adequate provision for all persons to have due legal aid in order to secure their rights.\" These sources support the conclusion that the Civil Gideon right is an emerging right in international jurisprudence. International bodies have been particularly apt to recognize this right when inequalities and threats to individuals' fundamental interests are exacerbated by the lack of legal assistance. Since the United States is a participant in several of these international treaty regimes, this international jurisprudence concerning Civil Gideon is highly relevant to evaluating whether the interest of justice are adequately served by the United States' current patchwork approach to the provision of civil counsel.","PeriodicalId":319905,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Treaties & Other Sources of International Law (Topic)","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In the Interests of Justice: Human Rights and the Right to Counsel in Civil Cases\",\"authors\":\"Martha F. Davis\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.968473\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This report examines the international human rights treaties binding on the United States as well as other non-binding international human rights documents to ascertain the status of the right to counsel in civil cases, the so-called \\\"Civil Gideon\\\" right. The United Nations treaty monitoring bodies responsible for the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination have both indicated that legal assistance may be required to ensure fairness in civil cases. The Charter of the Organization of American States, to which the United States is a party, goes farther and contains an explicit right to \\\"adequate provision for all persons to have due legal aid in order to secure their rights.\\\" These sources support the conclusion that the Civil Gideon right is an emerging right in international jurisprudence. International bodies have been particularly apt to recognize this right when inequalities and threats to individuals' fundamental interests are exacerbated by the lack of legal assistance. Since the United States is a participant in several of these international treaty regimes, this international jurisprudence concerning Civil Gideon is highly relevant to evaluating whether the interest of justice are adequately served by the United States' current patchwork approach to the provision of civil counsel.\",\"PeriodicalId\":319905,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LSN: Treaties & Other Sources of International Law (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LSN: Treaties & Other Sources of International Law (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.968473\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Treaties & Other Sources of International Law (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.968473","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
本报告审查了对美国具有约束力的国际人权条约以及其他不具有约束力的国际人权文件,以确定在民事案件中请律师的权利,即所谓的"民事吉迪恩"权利的地位。负责《公民权利和政治权利国际盟约》和《消除一切形式种族歧视公约》的联合国条约监测机构都指出,为确保民事案件的公正,可能需要法律援助。美国是美洲国家组织(Organization of American States)的缔约国,《宪章》更进一步,明确规定了“为所有人提供适当法律援助以保障其权利”的权利。这些资料支持了民事吉迪恩权是国际法理学上一项新兴权利的结论。当缺乏法律援助加剧了不平等和对个人基本利益的威胁时,国际机构特别容易承认这项权利。由于美国是其中几个国际条约制度的参与者,有关民事吉迪恩的国际法理学与评估美国目前提供民事律师的拼凑方式是否充分服务于司法利益高度相关。
In the Interests of Justice: Human Rights and the Right to Counsel in Civil Cases
This report examines the international human rights treaties binding on the United States as well as other non-binding international human rights documents to ascertain the status of the right to counsel in civil cases, the so-called "Civil Gideon" right. The United Nations treaty monitoring bodies responsible for the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination have both indicated that legal assistance may be required to ensure fairness in civil cases. The Charter of the Organization of American States, to which the United States is a party, goes farther and contains an explicit right to "adequate provision for all persons to have due legal aid in order to secure their rights." These sources support the conclusion that the Civil Gideon right is an emerging right in international jurisprudence. International bodies have been particularly apt to recognize this right when inequalities and threats to individuals' fundamental interests are exacerbated by the lack of legal assistance. Since the United States is a participant in several of these international treaty regimes, this international jurisprudence concerning Civil Gideon is highly relevant to evaluating whether the interest of justice are adequately served by the United States' current patchwork approach to the provision of civil counsel.