{"title":"N-BEATS用于心功能障碍分类","authors":"B. Puszkarski, K. Hryniów, G. Sarwas","doi":"10.23919/cinc53138.2021.9662740","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Recurrent Neural Networks are useful tools for the prediction and classification of ECG problems. The most commonly used network for such a solution is Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) architecture. This study aims to assess if another state-of-the-art solution, Neural Basis Expansion Analysis for Interpretable Time Series (N-BEATS), can be adopted to diagnose the same cardiac problems. In addition, a comparison is conducted for a different number of electrocardiogram leads. Methods: Two architectures were tested for performance and dimension reduction problems, both in variants consisting of blended branches, allowing retaining accuracy while reducing the computational capacity needed. Results: Our team's (WEAIT) entry was scored incorrectly due to unexpected formatting in outputs; hence only results from cross-validation are presented. LSTM outperforms N-BEATS in terms of multi-label classification, data set resilience, and obtained challenge metrics. Still, N-BEATS can obtain acceptable results and outperforms LSTM in terms of complexity and speed. Conclusions: This paper features a novel approach of using the N-BEATS, which was previously used only for forecasting, to classify ECG signals with success. While N-BEATS multi-label classification capacity is lower than LSTM, its speed allows it to be used on wearable devices.","PeriodicalId":126746,"journal":{"name":"2021 Computing in Cardiology (CinC)","volume":"68 5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"N-BEATS for Heart Dysfunction Classification\",\"authors\":\"B. Puszkarski, K. Hryniów, G. Sarwas\",\"doi\":\"10.23919/cinc53138.2021.9662740\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Recurrent Neural Networks are useful tools for the prediction and classification of ECG problems. The most commonly used network for such a solution is Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) architecture. This study aims to assess if another state-of-the-art solution, Neural Basis Expansion Analysis for Interpretable Time Series (N-BEATS), can be adopted to diagnose the same cardiac problems. In addition, a comparison is conducted for a different number of electrocardiogram leads. Methods: Two architectures were tested for performance and dimension reduction problems, both in variants consisting of blended branches, allowing retaining accuracy while reducing the computational capacity needed. Results: Our team's (WEAIT) entry was scored incorrectly due to unexpected formatting in outputs; hence only results from cross-validation are presented. LSTM outperforms N-BEATS in terms of multi-label classification, data set resilience, and obtained challenge metrics. Still, N-BEATS can obtain acceptable results and outperforms LSTM in terms of complexity and speed. Conclusions: This paper features a novel approach of using the N-BEATS, which was previously used only for forecasting, to classify ECG signals with success. While N-BEATS multi-label classification capacity is lower than LSTM, its speed allows it to be used on wearable devices.\",\"PeriodicalId\":126746,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 Computing in Cardiology (CinC)\",\"volume\":\"68 5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 Computing in Cardiology (CinC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23919/cinc53138.2021.9662740\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 Computing in Cardiology (CinC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/cinc53138.2021.9662740","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: Recurrent Neural Networks are useful tools for the prediction and classification of ECG problems. The most commonly used network for such a solution is Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) architecture. This study aims to assess if another state-of-the-art solution, Neural Basis Expansion Analysis for Interpretable Time Series (N-BEATS), can be adopted to diagnose the same cardiac problems. In addition, a comparison is conducted for a different number of electrocardiogram leads. Methods: Two architectures were tested for performance and dimension reduction problems, both in variants consisting of blended branches, allowing retaining accuracy while reducing the computational capacity needed. Results: Our team's (WEAIT) entry was scored incorrectly due to unexpected formatting in outputs; hence only results from cross-validation are presented. LSTM outperforms N-BEATS in terms of multi-label classification, data set resilience, and obtained challenge metrics. Still, N-BEATS can obtain acceptable results and outperforms LSTM in terms of complexity and speed. Conclusions: This paper features a novel approach of using the N-BEATS, which was previously used only for forecasting, to classify ECG signals with success. While N-BEATS multi-label classification capacity is lower than LSTM, its speed allows it to be used on wearable devices.