A021:自体非减毒活胶质母细胞瘤细胞接种可诱导强效外周和肿瘤内抗肿瘤反应:一项首次人体研究

I. Volovitz, N. Shapira, R. Grossman, Z. Ram
{"title":"A021:自体非减毒活胶质母细胞瘤细胞接种可诱导强效外周和肿瘤内抗肿瘤反应:一项首次人体研究","authors":"I. Volovitz, N. Shapira, R. Grossman, Z. Ram","doi":"10.1158/2326-6074.CRICIMTEATIAACR18-A021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Glioblastoma (GBM), which grows uninhibited in the brain, almost never metastasizes outside of it. The rare occurrence ( 9 months) approximately 50% of rats challenged with F98 cells intracranially. The results in the F98 model were corroborated in the CNS1 astrocytoma model in Lewis rats. The fraction of cured rats in both models were the highest reported in published literature. We found that the spontaneous rejection of live glioma cells inoculated in peripheral sites was immune-mediated. This location-biased immune response was termed “Split Immunity”—a tumor that thrives in an immune-privileged site (e.g., the brain) may be inhibited by injecting live unmodified tumor cells in a site that is not privileged, generating protective immunity that spreads back to the privileged site.To evaluate the applicability of the “Split Immunity” approach in humans, we ran a first-in-human (FIH) study on two recurrent GBM patients. The patients were vaccinated subcutaneously, initially with autologous irradiated tumor cells, and then with autologous, non-attenuated, live tumor cells. The treatment caused no serious adverse events. The injected live tumor cells did not grow at the inoculation site, nor did they spread metastatically, as evaluated by choline 18F PET-CT. Standard biochemical and hematologic blood tests showed no treatment-related adverse effects. Both patients’ quality of life (QoL) questionnaires demonstrated subjective improvements in self-evaluated “global health status.” The treatment had demonstrated several signs indicative of efficacy. MRI evaluation using “treatment response assessment maps” (TRAM) demonstrated strong increases in the “treatment-response” component following live-cell vaccination, compatible with “pseudo-progression-like” responses in both patients. Using elaborate 8-color flow cytometric panels, we detected potent tumor-cell specific polyfunctional activation in 2.5% and 5% of peripheral cytotoxic T-cell (CTL) and T helper cells (Th), respectively, 3 days following live-cell vaccination. Flow cytometric immune mapping of all intratumoral immune cell subsets showed major changes from baseline that had occurred shortly after live-cell vaccinations. We observed major increases (8 to 200 fold) in both patients of all monitored intratumoral dendritic cell (DC) subsets (CD1c+ and CD141+ myeloid DC, CD123+ plasmacytoid DC). Patient-1 showed the highest frequency of intratumoral CD56brt natural killer (NK) cells from all previously fully mapped brain tumor patients. Patient-2’s intratumoral CTL and Th were increase by 6- and 17-fold, respectively. Patient-2’s CD141+ and CD1c+ myeloid DC had exhibited upregulated CD86 maturation marker following treatment. Overall, the immune infiltrate following treatment in Patient-2 exceeded the immune infiltrates found in 42 previously fully-mapped brain tumor patients. The flow cytometric results were corroborated by the patients’ immunohistochemistry data. Patient-2, who had been treated by a tighter vaccination protocol than Patient-1, had survived 19 months after GBM recurrence, which is considerably longer than the median 6- to 8-month survival of recurrent GBM patients. Taken together, the accumulated FIH results are suggestive of safety and efficacy of the “Split Immunity” approach. Based on the these results, we have recently received an ethical approval for a phase IIa clinical trial on 8 recurrent- and 4 newly-diagnosed GBM patients. Citation Format: Ilan Volovitz, Nati Shapira, Rachel Grossman, Zvi Ram. Vaccination with autologous, nonattenuated, live glioblastoma cells induces potent peripheral and intratumoral anti-tumoral responses: A first-in-human study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Fourth CRI-CIMT-EATI-AACR International Cancer Immunotherapy Conference: Translating Science into Survival; Sept 30-Oct 3, 2018; New York, NY. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Immunol Res 2019;7(2 Suppl):Abstract nr A021.","PeriodicalId":244081,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Trials of Cancer Immunotherapies","volume":"77 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Abstract A021: Vaccination with autologous, nonattenuated, live glioblastoma cells induces potent peripheral and intratumoral anti-tumoral responses: A first-in-human study\",\"authors\":\"I. Volovitz, N. Shapira, R. Grossman, Z. Ram\",\"doi\":\"10.1158/2326-6074.CRICIMTEATIAACR18-A021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Glioblastoma (GBM), which grows uninhibited in the brain, almost never metastasizes outside of it. The rare occurrence ( 9 months) approximately 50% of rats challenged with F98 cells intracranially. The results in the F98 model were corroborated in the CNS1 astrocytoma model in Lewis rats. The fraction of cured rats in both models were the highest reported in published literature. We found that the spontaneous rejection of live glioma cells inoculated in peripheral sites was immune-mediated. This location-biased immune response was termed “Split Immunity”—a tumor that thrives in an immune-privileged site (e.g., the brain) may be inhibited by injecting live unmodified tumor cells in a site that is not privileged, generating protective immunity that spreads back to the privileged site.To evaluate the applicability of the “Split Immunity” approach in humans, we ran a first-in-human (FIH) study on two recurrent GBM patients. The patients were vaccinated subcutaneously, initially with autologous irradiated tumor cells, and then with autologous, non-attenuated, live tumor cells. The treatment caused no serious adverse events. The injected live tumor cells did not grow at the inoculation site, nor did they spread metastatically, as evaluated by choline 18F PET-CT. Standard biochemical and hematologic blood tests showed no treatment-related adverse effects. Both patients’ quality of life (QoL) questionnaires demonstrated subjective improvements in self-evaluated “global health status.” The treatment had demonstrated several signs indicative of efficacy. MRI evaluation using “treatment response assessment maps” (TRAM) demonstrated strong increases in the “treatment-response” component following live-cell vaccination, compatible with “pseudo-progression-like” responses in both patients. Using elaborate 8-color flow cytometric panels, we detected potent tumor-cell specific polyfunctional activation in 2.5% and 5% of peripheral cytotoxic T-cell (CTL) and T helper cells (Th), respectively, 3 days following live-cell vaccination. Flow cytometric immune mapping of all intratumoral immune cell subsets showed major changes from baseline that had occurred shortly after live-cell vaccinations. We observed major increases (8 to 200 fold) in both patients of all monitored intratumoral dendritic cell (DC) subsets (CD1c+ and CD141+ myeloid DC, CD123+ plasmacytoid DC). Patient-1 showed the highest frequency of intratumoral CD56brt natural killer (NK) cells from all previously fully mapped brain tumor patients. Patient-2’s intratumoral CTL and Th were increase by 6- and 17-fold, respectively. Patient-2’s CD141+ and CD1c+ myeloid DC had exhibited upregulated CD86 maturation marker following treatment. Overall, the immune infiltrate following treatment in Patient-2 exceeded the immune infiltrates found in 42 previously fully-mapped brain tumor patients. The flow cytometric results were corroborated by the patients’ immunohistochemistry data. Patient-2, who had been treated by a tighter vaccination protocol than Patient-1, had survived 19 months after GBM recurrence, which is considerably longer than the median 6- to 8-month survival of recurrent GBM patients. Taken together, the accumulated FIH results are suggestive of safety and efficacy of the “Split Immunity” approach. Based on the these results, we have recently received an ethical approval for a phase IIa clinical trial on 8 recurrent- and 4 newly-diagnosed GBM patients. Citation Format: Ilan Volovitz, Nati Shapira, Rachel Grossman, Zvi Ram. Vaccination with autologous, nonattenuated, live glioblastoma cells induces potent peripheral and intratumoral anti-tumoral responses: A first-in-human study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Fourth CRI-CIMT-EATI-AACR International Cancer Immunotherapy Conference: Translating Science into Survival; Sept 30-Oct 3, 2018; New York, NY. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Immunol Res 2019;7(2 Suppl):Abstract nr A021.\",\"PeriodicalId\":244081,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Trials of Cancer Immunotherapies\",\"volume\":\"77 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Trials of Cancer Immunotherapies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1158/2326-6074.CRICIMTEATIAACR18-A021\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Trials of Cancer Immunotherapies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/2326-6074.CRICIMTEATIAACR18-A021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)在大脑中生长不受抑制,几乎从不转移到大脑外。罕见的发生(9个月),大约50%的大鼠受到F98细胞的颅内攻击。F98模型的结果在Lewis大鼠CNS1星形细胞瘤模型中得到证实。两种模型的治愈率均为已发表文献中报道的最高。我们发现活胶质瘤细胞接种在外周部位的自发排斥反应是免疫介导的。这种位置偏向性免疫反应被称为“分裂免疫”——在免疫特权部位(如大脑)生长的肿瘤可以通过在非特权部位注射未修饰的活肿瘤细胞来抑制,从而产生保护性免疫,并扩散回特权部位。为了评估“分裂免疫”方法在人类中的适用性,我们对两名复发性GBM患者进行了首次人体(FIH)研究。患者先皮下接种自体辐照肿瘤细胞,然后注射自体非减毒活肿瘤细胞。治疗未发生严重不良事件。经胆碱18F PET-CT评估,注射的活肿瘤细胞没有在接种部位生长,也没有转移性扩散。标准的生化和血液学血液检查未显示与治疗相关的不良反应。两名患者的生活质量(QoL)问卷都显示了自我评估的“整体健康状况”的主观改善。这种治疗已显示出若干迹象表明其疗效。使用“治疗反应评估图”(TRAM)的MRI评估显示,在活细胞疫苗接种后,“治疗-反应”成分明显增加,与两名患者的“伪进展样”反应相一致。使用精细的8色流式细胞仪,我们检测到在活细胞接种3天后,2.5%和5%的外周细胞毒性T细胞(CTL)和T辅助细胞(Th)分别具有肿瘤细胞特异性的多功能激活。所有肿瘤内免疫细胞亚群的流式细胞免疫图谱显示,在活细胞接种后不久,与基线相比发生了重大变化。我们观察到两名患者所有监测的肿瘤内树突状细胞(DC)亚群(CD1c+和CD141+骨髓DC, CD123+浆细胞样DC)的显著增加(8至200倍)。患者-1的肿瘤内CD56brt自然杀伤(NK)细胞的频率在所有先前完全定位的脑肿瘤患者中最高。患者2的肿瘤内CTL和Th分别增加了6倍和17倍。患者-2的CD141+和CD1c+髓系DC在治疗后表现出CD86成熟标志物上调。总体而言,患者-2治疗后的免疫浸润超过了42例先前完全定位的脑肿瘤患者的免疫浸润。流式细胞术结果与患者的免疫组织化学数据相吻合。患者2接受了比患者1更严格的疫苗接种方案治疗,在GBM复发后存活了19个月,这比复发GBM患者的中位生存期6至8个月要长得多。综上所述,累积的FIH结果提示“分裂免疫”方法的安全性和有效性。基于这些结果,我们最近获得了对8名复发和4名新诊断的GBM患者进行IIa期临床试验的伦理批准。引文格式:Ilan Volovitz, Nati Shapira, Rachel Grossman, Zvi Ram。自体、非减毒的活胶质母细胞瘤细胞接种疫苗可诱导强效外周和肿瘤内抗肿瘤反应:一项首次人体研究[摘要]。第四届CRI-CIMT-EATI-AACR国际癌症免疫治疗会议:将科学转化为生存;2018年9月30日至10月3日;纽约,纽约。费城(PA): AACR;癌症免疫杂志2019;7(2增刊):摘要nr A021。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Abstract A021: Vaccination with autologous, nonattenuated, live glioblastoma cells induces potent peripheral and intratumoral anti-tumoral responses: A first-in-human study
Glioblastoma (GBM), which grows uninhibited in the brain, almost never metastasizes outside of it. The rare occurrence ( 9 months) approximately 50% of rats challenged with F98 cells intracranially. The results in the F98 model were corroborated in the CNS1 astrocytoma model in Lewis rats. The fraction of cured rats in both models were the highest reported in published literature. We found that the spontaneous rejection of live glioma cells inoculated in peripheral sites was immune-mediated. This location-biased immune response was termed “Split Immunity”—a tumor that thrives in an immune-privileged site (e.g., the brain) may be inhibited by injecting live unmodified tumor cells in a site that is not privileged, generating protective immunity that spreads back to the privileged site.To evaluate the applicability of the “Split Immunity” approach in humans, we ran a first-in-human (FIH) study on two recurrent GBM patients. The patients were vaccinated subcutaneously, initially with autologous irradiated tumor cells, and then with autologous, non-attenuated, live tumor cells. The treatment caused no serious adverse events. The injected live tumor cells did not grow at the inoculation site, nor did they spread metastatically, as evaluated by choline 18F PET-CT. Standard biochemical and hematologic blood tests showed no treatment-related adverse effects. Both patients’ quality of life (QoL) questionnaires demonstrated subjective improvements in self-evaluated “global health status.” The treatment had demonstrated several signs indicative of efficacy. MRI evaluation using “treatment response assessment maps” (TRAM) demonstrated strong increases in the “treatment-response” component following live-cell vaccination, compatible with “pseudo-progression-like” responses in both patients. Using elaborate 8-color flow cytometric panels, we detected potent tumor-cell specific polyfunctional activation in 2.5% and 5% of peripheral cytotoxic T-cell (CTL) and T helper cells (Th), respectively, 3 days following live-cell vaccination. Flow cytometric immune mapping of all intratumoral immune cell subsets showed major changes from baseline that had occurred shortly after live-cell vaccinations. We observed major increases (8 to 200 fold) in both patients of all monitored intratumoral dendritic cell (DC) subsets (CD1c+ and CD141+ myeloid DC, CD123+ plasmacytoid DC). Patient-1 showed the highest frequency of intratumoral CD56brt natural killer (NK) cells from all previously fully mapped brain tumor patients. Patient-2’s intratumoral CTL and Th were increase by 6- and 17-fold, respectively. Patient-2’s CD141+ and CD1c+ myeloid DC had exhibited upregulated CD86 maturation marker following treatment. Overall, the immune infiltrate following treatment in Patient-2 exceeded the immune infiltrates found in 42 previously fully-mapped brain tumor patients. The flow cytometric results were corroborated by the patients’ immunohistochemistry data. Patient-2, who had been treated by a tighter vaccination protocol than Patient-1, had survived 19 months after GBM recurrence, which is considerably longer than the median 6- to 8-month survival of recurrent GBM patients. Taken together, the accumulated FIH results are suggestive of safety and efficacy of the “Split Immunity” approach. Based on the these results, we have recently received an ethical approval for a phase IIa clinical trial on 8 recurrent- and 4 newly-diagnosed GBM patients. Citation Format: Ilan Volovitz, Nati Shapira, Rachel Grossman, Zvi Ram. Vaccination with autologous, nonattenuated, live glioblastoma cells induces potent peripheral and intratumoral anti-tumoral responses: A first-in-human study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Fourth CRI-CIMT-EATI-AACR International Cancer Immunotherapy Conference: Translating Science into Survival; Sept 30-Oct 3, 2018; New York, NY. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Immunol Res 2019;7(2 Suppl):Abstract nr A021.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Abstract A006: Phase 1 study to evaluate the safety and tolerability of MEDI4736 (durvalumab, durva) + tremelimumab (treme) in patients with advanced solid tumors Abstract A021: Vaccination with autologous, nonattenuated, live glioblastoma cells induces potent peripheral and intratumoral anti-tumoral responses: A first-in-human study Abstract A010: Personalized neoantigen-targeting vaccines for high-risk melanoma generate epitope spreading Abstract A016: PEGylated IL-10 (pegilodecakin) induces systemic immune activation, CD8+ T-cell invigoration and polyclonal T-cell expansion in cancer patients Abstract A008: Neoadjuvant nivolumab, gemcitabine and cisplatin in muscle-invasive bladder cancer: Study update
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1