消化酶的失活和粘液的降解:决定抗生素对肠道不同影响的可能关键因素。

X. Qin
{"title":"消化酶的失活和粘液的降解:决定抗生素对肠道不同影响的可能关键因素。","authors":"X. Qin","doi":"10.1097/MIB.0000000000001015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To the Editor: I read with great interest the article by Ward et al published recently in this journal regarding the effect of antibiotics on dextran sulfate sodium–induced colitis.1 It is found that treatment with broadspectrum antibiotics protected mice against colitis by changes in gut microbiota. However, as discussed in the article,1 this is in contrast to multiple studies demonstrating antibiotics increased the risk of inflammatory bowel disease in human and colitis in animals in a variety of models. The mechanism behind this remains elusive. At present, the mainstream of research including this article still mainly focused on immune response of the body or the production of some bioactive agents such as short chain fatty acids by gut bacteria. Here I suggest that inactivation of digestive proteases within gut lumen and degradation of the mucus at gut surface may be actually the primary determinant factors for the observed effects of antibiotics. The evidence that I collected during the last 15 years made me to believe that impaired inactivation of digestive proteases due to reduction in gut bacteria in modern society may have played a causative role in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease.2,3 Studies showed that under conventional conditions, pancreatic digestive proteases are hardly detectable in the lower gut, whereas a large amount of them appeared in the large intestine of animals raised under germ-free conditions, suggesting the critical role of gut bacteria in inactivation of these digestive proteases in the lower intestine. Different kinds and doses of antibiotics may have different effects on digestive proteases inactivation. Nevertheless, mucin, the structural molecule of the protective mucus layer, is composed of 15% of a central core peptide and 85% of side carbohydrate branches that can only be effectively degraded in the existence of both digestive proteases from the pancreas and glycosidases from gut bacteria.4 Thus, as discussed in my articles,3,4 certain extent of reduction of gut bacteria by antibiotics may exacerbate the injury of gut as the result of accelerated degradation of the protective mucus layer by the synergic action of poorly inactivated digestive proteases and glycosides in the remaining gut bacteria, while further extensive reduction in gut bacteria may become less detrimental or even protective because of the striking decrease in bacterial glycosides and retarded degradation of the mucus layer as well as decreased infiltration of bacterial toxicant due to the decrease in bacterial load in gut lumen. This may have contributed explain the less gut damage in both poor hygiene and germ-free conditions,4 as well as the different effects of antibiotics on the gut. Therefore, I recommend conducting more research in this regard.","PeriodicalId":339644,"journal":{"name":"Inflammatory Bowel Disease","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inactivation of Digestive Proteases and Degradation of Mucus: The Possible Key Factors That Determined the Different Effects on the Gut by Antibiotics.\",\"authors\":\"X. Qin\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MIB.0000000000001015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To the Editor: I read with great interest the article by Ward et al published recently in this journal regarding the effect of antibiotics on dextran sulfate sodium–induced colitis.1 It is found that treatment with broadspectrum antibiotics protected mice against colitis by changes in gut microbiota. However, as discussed in the article,1 this is in contrast to multiple studies demonstrating antibiotics increased the risk of inflammatory bowel disease in human and colitis in animals in a variety of models. The mechanism behind this remains elusive. At present, the mainstream of research including this article still mainly focused on immune response of the body or the production of some bioactive agents such as short chain fatty acids by gut bacteria. Here I suggest that inactivation of digestive proteases within gut lumen and degradation of the mucus at gut surface may be actually the primary determinant factors for the observed effects of antibiotics. The evidence that I collected during the last 15 years made me to believe that impaired inactivation of digestive proteases due to reduction in gut bacteria in modern society may have played a causative role in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease.2,3 Studies showed that under conventional conditions, pancreatic digestive proteases are hardly detectable in the lower gut, whereas a large amount of them appeared in the large intestine of animals raised under germ-free conditions, suggesting the critical role of gut bacteria in inactivation of these digestive proteases in the lower intestine. Different kinds and doses of antibiotics may have different effects on digestive proteases inactivation. Nevertheless, mucin, the structural molecule of the protective mucus layer, is composed of 15% of a central core peptide and 85% of side carbohydrate branches that can only be effectively degraded in the existence of both digestive proteases from the pancreas and glycosidases from gut bacteria.4 Thus, as discussed in my articles,3,4 certain extent of reduction of gut bacteria by antibiotics may exacerbate the injury of gut as the result of accelerated degradation of the protective mucus layer by the synergic action of poorly inactivated digestive proteases and glycosides in the remaining gut bacteria, while further extensive reduction in gut bacteria may become less detrimental or even protective because of the striking decrease in bacterial glycosides and retarded degradation of the mucus layer as well as decreased infiltration of bacterial toxicant due to the decrease in bacterial load in gut lumen. This may have contributed explain the less gut damage in both poor hygiene and germ-free conditions,4 as well as the different effects of antibiotics on the gut. Therefore, I recommend conducting more research in this regard.\",\"PeriodicalId\":339644,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Inflammatory Bowel Disease\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Inflammatory Bowel Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MIB.0000000000001015\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inflammatory Bowel Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MIB.0000000000001015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

致编辑:我怀着极大的兴趣阅读了Ward等人最近在该杂志上发表的一篇关于抗生素对葡聚糖硫酸钠诱导的结肠炎的影响的文章研究发现,广谱抗生素治疗通过改变肠道菌群来保护小鼠免受结肠炎的侵袭。然而,正如文章中所讨论的,这与多项研究相反,这些研究表明抗生素增加了人类炎症性肠病和各种模型动物结肠炎的风险。这背后的机制仍然难以捉摸。目前,包括本文在内的主流研究仍主要集中在机体的免疫反应或肠道细菌产生短链脂肪酸等生物活性物质。在这里,我认为肠道内消化性蛋白酶的失活和肠道表面黏液的降解实际上可能是观察到的抗生素效果的主要决定因素。我在过去15年中收集的证据使我相信,由于现代社会肠道细菌减少而导致的消化蛋白酶失活受损可能在炎症性肠病的发病机制中起了致病作用。2,3研究表明,在常规条件下,胰腺消化蛋白酶在下肠中几乎检测不到,而在无菌条件下饲养的动物的大肠中却出现了大量的胰腺消化蛋白酶,这表明肠道细菌在下肠中这些消化蛋白酶的失活中起着关键作用。不同种类和剂量的抗生素对消化酶的失活效果不同。然而,黏液保护层的结构分子粘蛋白由15%的中心核心肽和85%的侧碳水化合物分支组成,只有在胰腺的消化蛋白酶和肠道细菌的糖苷酶同时存在的情况下才能有效降解因此,正如我在文章中所讨论的那样,抗生素在一定程度上减少肠道细菌可能会加剧肠道的损伤,因为在剩余的肠道细菌中,失活不良的消化蛋白酶和糖苷的协同作用加速了保护黏液层的降解。然而,肠道细菌的进一步广泛减少可能变得不那么有害,甚至具有保护作用,因为细菌糖苷的显著减少,黏液层的降解迟缓,以及由于肠道内细菌负荷的减少而减少的细菌毒物的浸润。这可能有助于解释在卫生条件差和无菌条件下肠道损伤较小,以及抗生素对肠道的不同影响。因此,我建议在这方面进行更多的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Inactivation of Digestive Proteases and Degradation of Mucus: The Possible Key Factors That Determined the Different Effects on the Gut by Antibiotics.
To the Editor: I read with great interest the article by Ward et al published recently in this journal regarding the effect of antibiotics on dextran sulfate sodium–induced colitis.1 It is found that treatment with broadspectrum antibiotics protected mice against colitis by changes in gut microbiota. However, as discussed in the article,1 this is in contrast to multiple studies demonstrating antibiotics increased the risk of inflammatory bowel disease in human and colitis in animals in a variety of models. The mechanism behind this remains elusive. At present, the mainstream of research including this article still mainly focused on immune response of the body or the production of some bioactive agents such as short chain fatty acids by gut bacteria. Here I suggest that inactivation of digestive proteases within gut lumen and degradation of the mucus at gut surface may be actually the primary determinant factors for the observed effects of antibiotics. The evidence that I collected during the last 15 years made me to believe that impaired inactivation of digestive proteases due to reduction in gut bacteria in modern society may have played a causative role in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease.2,3 Studies showed that under conventional conditions, pancreatic digestive proteases are hardly detectable in the lower gut, whereas a large amount of them appeared in the large intestine of animals raised under germ-free conditions, suggesting the critical role of gut bacteria in inactivation of these digestive proteases in the lower intestine. Different kinds and doses of antibiotics may have different effects on digestive proteases inactivation. Nevertheless, mucin, the structural molecule of the protective mucus layer, is composed of 15% of a central core peptide and 85% of side carbohydrate branches that can only be effectively degraded in the existence of both digestive proteases from the pancreas and glycosidases from gut bacteria.4 Thus, as discussed in my articles,3,4 certain extent of reduction of gut bacteria by antibiotics may exacerbate the injury of gut as the result of accelerated degradation of the protective mucus layer by the synergic action of poorly inactivated digestive proteases and glycosides in the remaining gut bacteria, while further extensive reduction in gut bacteria may become less detrimental or even protective because of the striking decrease in bacterial glycosides and retarded degradation of the mucus layer as well as decreased infiltration of bacterial toxicant due to the decrease in bacterial load in gut lumen. This may have contributed explain the less gut damage in both poor hygiene and germ-free conditions,4 as well as the different effects of antibiotics on the gut. Therefore, I recommend conducting more research in this regard.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Inactivation of Digestive Proteases and Degradation of Mucus: The Possible Key Factors That Determined the Different Effects on the Gut by Antibiotics. P-099 Impact of Inflammatory Bowel Disease on Sexual Function of Patients in a Mexican Population Damage of the Mucus Layer: The Possible Shared Critical Common Cause for Both Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) and Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS). P-104 Association Between pANCA Status and Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Ulcerative Colitis: A Meta-analysis The Ileitis of Ulcerative Colitis. Why Is It Not Crohn's Disease?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1