教学邪恶

M. Sullivan
{"title":"教学邪恶","authors":"M. Sullivan","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198834106.003.0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this chapter, Meghan Sullivan reflects on difficulties we face in teaching the problem of evil. She describes two approaches to the epistemology of theism—one which insists that answers to challenges be as neutral as possible and one which insists that we are rationally justified in appealing to particular faith commitments when answering challenges. After defending the latter approach from some objections, she argues that taking this approach seriously motivates a more confessional approach to teaching the problem of evil (and other, non-religious philosophical puzzles as well).","PeriodicalId":266212,"journal":{"name":"Christian Philosophy","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Teaching Evil\",\"authors\":\"M. Sullivan\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oso/9780198834106.003.0011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this chapter, Meghan Sullivan reflects on difficulties we face in teaching the problem of evil. She describes two approaches to the epistemology of theism—one which insists that answers to challenges be as neutral as possible and one which insists that we are rationally justified in appealing to particular faith commitments when answering challenges. After defending the latter approach from some objections, she argues that taking this approach seriously motivates a more confessional approach to teaching the problem of evil (and other, non-religious philosophical puzzles as well).\",\"PeriodicalId\":266212,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Christian Philosophy\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Christian Philosophy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198834106.003.0011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Christian Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198834106.003.0011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这一章中,梅根·沙利文反思了我们在教导邪恶问题时所面临的困难。她描述了两种有神论认识论的方法——一种坚持认为对挑战的回答尽可能中立,另一种坚持认为我们在回答挑战时诉诸特定的信仰承诺是合理的。在为后一种方法辩护了一些反对意见之后,她认为,认真对待这种方法,可以激发一种更忏悔的方法来教授邪恶问题(以及其他非宗教哲学难题)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Teaching Evil
In this chapter, Meghan Sullivan reflects on difficulties we face in teaching the problem of evil. She describes two approaches to the epistemology of theism—one which insists that answers to challenges be as neutral as possible and one which insists that we are rationally justified in appealing to particular faith commitments when answering challenges. After defending the latter approach from some objections, she argues that taking this approach seriously motivates a more confessional approach to teaching the problem of evil (and other, non-religious philosophical puzzles as well).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Teaching Evil Philosophy, Religion, and Worldview Responding to Challenges The Strategies of Christian Philosophy Discerning the Spirit
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1