合同忠诚义务:履行和执行合同中的诚信

Jori Munukka
{"title":"合同忠诚义务:履行和执行合同中的诚信","authors":"Jori Munukka","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3076434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In most Western legal systems, contract law, to some extent, requires parties to act in consideration of the counterparty’s interests. This is originally a Roman law idea. In the Latin European law family we find bonne foi and similar concepts laid down in the civil codes. In German law the codified concept Treu und Glauben is considered to be one of the most important pillars of the private law system, and equivalent codified domestic concepts have impetus throughout the Germanic private law family. The standing of good faith within the common law world, however, differs significantly. In some common law countries good faith is fundamental. This is especially true for the United States, where good faith in performance and enforcement of contracts has grown into almost every aspect of contract law in almost every state. It has a statutory basis as a result of the state by state transpositions of the Uniform Commercial Code, and the authority is strengthened by the Restatements (2d) of Contracts. The United Kingdom is at the opposite end of the scale. Good faith, though existing in some types of contracts, is not recognised as a norm with general applicability, not even in the contractual stage. \nOne will find Nordic law, as so often it is, positioned between civil and common law but clearly leaning towards civil law. This requirement is in Nordic legal terminology phrased the duty of loyalty. It has no statutory basis with general scope. Nonetheless, a requirement to consider the other party’s interests does exist. In support, there are some statutory provisions covering certain professions, a growing number of court cases and consensus in the literature.","PeriodicalId":129207,"journal":{"name":"Law & Society: Private Law - Contracts eJournal","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Contractual Duty of Loyalty: Good Faith in the Performance and Enforcement of Contracts\",\"authors\":\"Jori Munukka\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3076434\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In most Western legal systems, contract law, to some extent, requires parties to act in consideration of the counterparty’s interests. This is originally a Roman law idea. In the Latin European law family we find bonne foi and similar concepts laid down in the civil codes. In German law the codified concept Treu und Glauben is considered to be one of the most important pillars of the private law system, and equivalent codified domestic concepts have impetus throughout the Germanic private law family. The standing of good faith within the common law world, however, differs significantly. In some common law countries good faith is fundamental. This is especially true for the United States, where good faith in performance and enforcement of contracts has grown into almost every aspect of contract law in almost every state. It has a statutory basis as a result of the state by state transpositions of the Uniform Commercial Code, and the authority is strengthened by the Restatements (2d) of Contracts. The United Kingdom is at the opposite end of the scale. Good faith, though existing in some types of contracts, is not recognised as a norm with general applicability, not even in the contractual stage. \\nOne will find Nordic law, as so often it is, positioned between civil and common law but clearly leaning towards civil law. This requirement is in Nordic legal terminology phrased the duty of loyalty. It has no statutory basis with general scope. Nonetheless, a requirement to consider the other party’s interests does exist. In support, there are some statutory provisions covering certain professions, a growing number of court cases and consensus in the literature.\",\"PeriodicalId\":129207,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Law & Society: Private Law - Contracts eJournal\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Law & Society: Private Law - Contracts eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3076434\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law & Society: Private Law - Contracts eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3076434","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在大多数西方法律体系中,合同法在某种程度上要求当事人的行为考虑对方的利益。这最初是罗马法的观点。在拉丁欧洲法系中,我们发现民事法典中规定了财产保护和类似的概念。在德国法中,法律编纂概念“保护与保护”被认为是私法制度最重要的支柱之一,同等的国内法律编纂概念在整个德国私法大家庭中都有推动作用。然而,在普通法世界中,诚信的地位却有很大不同。在一些普通法国家,诚信是基本原则。对于美国来说尤其如此,在美国,履行和执行合同中的诚信已经发展成为几乎每个州合同法的每个方面。由于各州对《统一商法典》的转换,它具有法定基础,而《合同重述(2d)》则加强了它的权威。英国则处于天平的另一端。诚信虽然存在于某些类型的合同中,但不被认为是具有普遍适用性的规范,甚至在合同阶段也不被认为是。人们会发现北欧的法律,就像经常发生的那样,定位于民法和普通法之间,但明显倾向于民法。这一要求在北欧法律术语中被称为忠诚义务。没有法定依据,适用范围一般。尽管如此,考虑对方利益的要求确实存在。在支持方面,有一些涉及某些专业的法定条款,越来越多的法庭案件和文献中的共识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Contractual Duty of Loyalty: Good Faith in the Performance and Enforcement of Contracts
In most Western legal systems, contract law, to some extent, requires parties to act in consideration of the counterparty’s interests. This is originally a Roman law idea. In the Latin European law family we find bonne foi and similar concepts laid down in the civil codes. In German law the codified concept Treu und Glauben is considered to be one of the most important pillars of the private law system, and equivalent codified domestic concepts have impetus throughout the Germanic private law family. The standing of good faith within the common law world, however, differs significantly. In some common law countries good faith is fundamental. This is especially true for the United States, where good faith in performance and enforcement of contracts has grown into almost every aspect of contract law in almost every state. It has a statutory basis as a result of the state by state transpositions of the Uniform Commercial Code, and the authority is strengthened by the Restatements (2d) of Contracts. The United Kingdom is at the opposite end of the scale. Good faith, though existing in some types of contracts, is not recognised as a norm with general applicability, not even in the contractual stage. One will find Nordic law, as so often it is, positioned between civil and common law but clearly leaning towards civil law. This requirement is in Nordic legal terminology phrased the duty of loyalty. It has no statutory basis with general scope. Nonetheless, a requirement to consider the other party’s interests does exist. In support, there are some statutory provisions covering certain professions, a growing number of court cases and consensus in the literature.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
La garantía legal del Estatuto del Consumidor como mecanismo para proteger al comprador frente a vicios inmobiliarios progresivos (The Legal Guarantee of the Consumers Statute as a Mechanism to Protect Buyer Front of Progressive Real Estate Vices) Solidarismo y contratos relacionales: alternativas frente a la pandemia de covid-19 (Contractual Solidarism and Relational Contract Theory: Alternative Approaches to Contract Law in Light of the COVID-19 Pandemic) Error Correction Mechanisms for Transactional Script Smart Contracts The Shadows of Litigation Finance Malas leyes (Bad Law)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1