行动者与环境的关系:对创业生态系统的积极和消极感受的分析

C. Fialho, Vânia Medianeira Flores Costa, Andrieli de Fátima Paz Nunes, Beatriz Leite Gustmann de Castro, M. C. Rodrigues
{"title":"行动者与环境的关系:对创业生态系统的积极和消极感受的分析","authors":"C. Fialho, Vânia Medianeira Flores Costa, Andrieli de Fátima Paz Nunes, Beatriz Leite Gustmann de Castro, M. C. Rodrigues","doi":"10.5902/1983465966335","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective of the study – To analyse the positive and negative feelings regarding the domains of an entrepreneurial ecosystem.\n \nDesign/methodology/approach – The present work is characterized as exploratory and descriptive in relation to the procedures as field research, and the approach is qualitative.\n \nFindings – Most of the feelings regarding the entrepreneurial ecosystem in the study are negative (30 feelings). However, there are positive perceptions (14 feelings) about the arrangement.  This can be seen through the importance of the people, actors and entrepreneurs in the ecosystem, as they act as agents in transforming actions. Concerning the negative aspects, the Public Policy and Culture domains also contain several indicators, mainly for the search for incentives and policies to disseminate entrepreneurship in the ecosystem.\n \nPractical & Social implications of the Study – This work sought to collaborate with studies in the field of entrepreneurship, specifically, in the domains of the ecosystem. Its strength lies in its theoretical and practical relevance, guiding entrepreneurs towards other specific aspects of the entrepreneurial ecosystem.\n \nOriginality – The study is original due to the environment in which it was conducted, unlike other studies on this theme, and the local arrangement had not yet been considered. Furthermore, regarding similar studies conducted in Brazil, few studies were found approaching this theme of the entrepreneurial ecosystem (Capes, 2020), which indicates the possibility of exploring this theme.","PeriodicalId":197586,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Administração da UFSM","volume":"96 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relationship between the actors and the environment: an analysis of positive and negative feelings about an entrepreneurial ecosystem\",\"authors\":\"C. Fialho, Vânia Medianeira Flores Costa, Andrieli de Fátima Paz Nunes, Beatriz Leite Gustmann de Castro, M. C. Rodrigues\",\"doi\":\"10.5902/1983465966335\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective of the study – To analyse the positive and negative feelings regarding the domains of an entrepreneurial ecosystem.\\n \\nDesign/methodology/approach – The present work is characterized as exploratory and descriptive in relation to the procedures as field research, and the approach is qualitative.\\n \\nFindings – Most of the feelings regarding the entrepreneurial ecosystem in the study are negative (30 feelings). However, there are positive perceptions (14 feelings) about the arrangement.  This can be seen through the importance of the people, actors and entrepreneurs in the ecosystem, as they act as agents in transforming actions. Concerning the negative aspects, the Public Policy and Culture domains also contain several indicators, mainly for the search for incentives and policies to disseminate entrepreneurship in the ecosystem.\\n \\nPractical & Social implications of the Study – This work sought to collaborate with studies in the field of entrepreneurship, specifically, in the domains of the ecosystem. Its strength lies in its theoretical and practical relevance, guiding entrepreneurs towards other specific aspects of the entrepreneurial ecosystem.\\n \\nOriginality – The study is original due to the environment in which it was conducted, unlike other studies on this theme, and the local arrangement had not yet been considered. Furthermore, regarding similar studies conducted in Brazil, few studies were found approaching this theme of the entrepreneurial ecosystem (Capes, 2020), which indicates the possibility of exploring this theme.\",\"PeriodicalId\":197586,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de Administração da UFSM\",\"volume\":\"96 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de Administração da UFSM\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5902/1983465966335\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Administração da UFSM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5902/1983465966335","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

研究的目的-分析关于创业生态系统领域的积极和消极情绪。设计/方法论/方法-目前的工作特点是探索性的和描述性的,与实地研究的过程有关,方法是定性的。研究结果-研究中对创业生态系统的大多数感受是负面的(30种感受)。然而,对这一安排也有积极的看法(14种感觉)。这可以从生态系统中人民、行动者和企业家的重要性看出,因为他们是变革行动的推动者。关于消极方面,公共政策和文化领域也包含几个指标,主要是为了寻找在生态系统中传播创业精神的激励和政策。该研究的实际和社会影响-这项工作寻求与创业领域的研究合作,特别是在生态系统领域。它的优势在于其理论和实践的相关性,引导企业家走向创业生态系统的其他具体方面。原创性:与其他研究不同,该研究的原创性在于其所处的环境,并且尚未考虑到当地的安排。此外,在巴西进行的类似研究中,很少有研究接近创业生态系统的这一主题(Capes, 2020),这表明了探索这一主题的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Relationship between the actors and the environment: an analysis of positive and negative feelings about an entrepreneurial ecosystem
Objective of the study – To analyse the positive and negative feelings regarding the domains of an entrepreneurial ecosystem.   Design/methodology/approach – The present work is characterized as exploratory and descriptive in relation to the procedures as field research, and the approach is qualitative.   Findings – Most of the feelings regarding the entrepreneurial ecosystem in the study are negative (30 feelings). However, there are positive perceptions (14 feelings) about the arrangement.  This can be seen through the importance of the people, actors and entrepreneurs in the ecosystem, as they act as agents in transforming actions. Concerning the negative aspects, the Public Policy and Culture domains also contain several indicators, mainly for the search for incentives and policies to disseminate entrepreneurship in the ecosystem.   Practical & Social implications of the Study – This work sought to collaborate with studies in the field of entrepreneurship, specifically, in the domains of the ecosystem. Its strength lies in its theoretical and practical relevance, guiding entrepreneurs towards other specific aspects of the entrepreneurial ecosystem.   Originality – The study is original due to the environment in which it was conducted, unlike other studies on this theme, and the local arrangement had not yet been considered. Furthermore, regarding similar studies conducted in Brazil, few studies were found approaching this theme of the entrepreneurial ecosystem (Capes, 2020), which indicates the possibility of exploring this theme.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Let’s get some food! The influence of marital status on the attributes’ perception of food delivery applications Scale of competencies for sustainability at the organizational scope The challenges of connecting situational leadership and emotional intelligence Understanding Smart Cities: A Systematic Review Economia circular e práticas sustentáveis adotadas por agricultores familiares
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1