地置法及其邻域- PIL规则之间的争论、发展和边界划分

C. Rupp
{"title":"地置法及其邻域- PIL规则之间的争论、发展和边界划分","authors":"C. Rupp","doi":"10.1515/eplj-2018-0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The lex rei sitae is one of the best-known rules of private international law (PIL). It certainly is one of the most straightforward – easy both to understand (at least in its basic mechanism) and to apply. Among the traditional arguments in favour of the lex rei sitae, the connection to territorial sovereignty, the facilitation of the enforcement of judgements and the practical need for the registration of in rem rights to adhere to the rules and procedures of the registration state have been the most prominent. Regarding immovables, the lex rei sitae and its stability and clarity have not been challenged as of yet. For movables, some exceptions to the strict situs rule can be found and in recent years, a general debate about possible alternatives to the lex rei sitae for “mobile” assets has started in earnest, but a fundamental change of this general PIL rule for property law questions cannot be","PeriodicalId":338086,"journal":{"name":"European Property Law Journal","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The lex rei sitae and Its Neighbours – Debates, Developments, and Delineating Boundaries Between PIL Rules\",\"authors\":\"C. Rupp\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/eplj-2018-0013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The lex rei sitae is one of the best-known rules of private international law (PIL). It certainly is one of the most straightforward – easy both to understand (at least in its basic mechanism) and to apply. Among the traditional arguments in favour of the lex rei sitae, the connection to territorial sovereignty, the facilitation of the enforcement of judgements and the practical need for the registration of in rem rights to adhere to the rules and procedures of the registration state have been the most prominent. Regarding immovables, the lex rei sitae and its stability and clarity have not been challenged as of yet. For movables, some exceptions to the strict situs rule can be found and in recent years, a general debate about possible alternatives to the lex rei sitae for “mobile” assets has started in earnest, but a fundamental change of this general PIL rule for property law questions cannot be\",\"PeriodicalId\":338086,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Property Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Property Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/eplj-2018-0013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Property Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/eplj-2018-0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

所在地法是国际私法中最著名的规则之一。它无疑是最直接的方法之一——既易于理解(至少其基本机制),也易于应用。在支持就地法的传统论据中,最突出的是与领土主权的联系、便于判决的执行以及对物权利的登记必须遵守登记国的规则和程序。关于不动产,就地法及其稳定性和明确性至今尚未受到挑战。对于动产,可以找到严格的地点规则的一些例外,近年来,关于“流动”资产的所在地法的可能替代方案的一般性辩论已经开始认真,但这种一般的PIL规则的根本改变是不可能的
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The lex rei sitae and Its Neighbours – Debates, Developments, and Delineating Boundaries Between PIL Rules
The lex rei sitae is one of the best-known rules of private international law (PIL). It certainly is one of the most straightforward – easy both to understand (at least in its basic mechanism) and to apply. Among the traditional arguments in favour of the lex rei sitae, the connection to territorial sovereignty, the facilitation of the enforcement of judgements and the practical need for the registration of in rem rights to adhere to the rules and procedures of the registration state have been the most prominent. Regarding immovables, the lex rei sitae and its stability and clarity have not been challenged as of yet. For movables, some exceptions to the strict situs rule can be found and in recent years, a general debate about possible alternatives to the lex rei sitae for “mobile” assets has started in earnest, but a fundamental change of this general PIL rule for property law questions cannot be
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial – Obligations for Owners to Climate-Proof Buildings Obligations for Owners to Climate-Proof Buildings in Spain Obligations for Owners to Climate-Proof Buildings in Sweden Obligations for Owners to Climate-Proof Buildings in the Netherlands Obligations for Owners to Climate-Proof Buildings: A Theoretical and Comparative Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1