系统架构决策管理,基于过程的方法

Ana Dragomir, H. Lichter, Tiberiu Budau
{"title":"系统架构决策管理,基于过程的方法","authors":"Ana Dragomir, H. Lichter, Tiberiu Budau","doi":"10.1109/WICSA.2014.39","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The documentation of architecture and design decisions lies at the backbone of building a comprehensive architectural knowledge basis within a company. As a consequence, a plethora of supporting frameworks has been lately proposed by the research community. The existing frameworks focus on capturing the rationale that lies behind a certain decision, but less on sustaining the collaborative process that architects employ when making decisions. In this paper, we propose an innovative architectural decision making process that sustains the collaboration of architects, the timely notification of involved stakeholders, the inclusion of feedback cycles to improve the overall quality of the architecting process and a tag-based traceability system that leverages informal learning. The analysis of the current state of the practice in the industry has been conducted within various workshops and interviews with our industry cooperation partner - the software provider of one of the biggest insurance trusts worldwide. Based on these results, we have identified various improvement potentials that are still not addressed by existing research in the field.","PeriodicalId":346971,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systematic Architectural Decision Management, A Process-Based Approach\",\"authors\":\"Ana Dragomir, H. Lichter, Tiberiu Budau\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/WICSA.2014.39\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The documentation of architecture and design decisions lies at the backbone of building a comprehensive architectural knowledge basis within a company. As a consequence, a plethora of supporting frameworks has been lately proposed by the research community. The existing frameworks focus on capturing the rationale that lies behind a certain decision, but less on sustaining the collaborative process that architects employ when making decisions. In this paper, we propose an innovative architectural decision making process that sustains the collaboration of architects, the timely notification of involved stakeholders, the inclusion of feedback cycles to improve the overall quality of the architecting process and a tag-based traceability system that leverages informal learning. The analysis of the current state of the practice in the industry has been conducted within various workshops and interviews with our industry cooperation partner - the software provider of one of the biggest insurance trusts worldwide. Based on these results, we have identified various improvement potentials that are still not addressed by existing research in the field.\",\"PeriodicalId\":346971,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/WICSA.2014.39\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/WICSA.2014.39","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

体系结构和设计决策的文档是在公司内部构建全面体系结构知识基础的支柱。因此,研究团体最近提出了大量的支持框架。现有的框架专注于捕获某个决策背后的基本原理,但较少关注架构师在制定决策时使用的协作过程的维持。在本文中,我们提出了一种创新的体系结构决策过程,它可以维持架构师之间的协作,及时通知涉众,包含反馈周期以提高体系结构过程的整体质量,以及利用非正式学习的基于标签的可追溯性系统。对行业实践现状的分析是在与我们的行业合作伙伴(全球最大的保险信托公司之一的软件提供商)的各种研讨会和访谈中进行的。基于这些结果,我们已经确定了各种改进潜力,这些潜力仍未被该领域的现有研究所解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Systematic Architectural Decision Management, A Process-Based Approach
The documentation of architecture and design decisions lies at the backbone of building a comprehensive architectural knowledge basis within a company. As a consequence, a plethora of supporting frameworks has been lately proposed by the research community. The existing frameworks focus on capturing the rationale that lies behind a certain decision, but less on sustaining the collaborative process that architects employ when making decisions. In this paper, we propose an innovative architectural decision making process that sustains the collaboration of architects, the timely notification of involved stakeholders, the inclusion of feedback cycles to improve the overall quality of the architecting process and a tag-based traceability system that leverages informal learning. The analysis of the current state of the practice in the industry has been conducted within various workshops and interviews with our industry cooperation partner - the software provider of one of the biggest insurance trusts worldwide. Based on these results, we have identified various improvement potentials that are still not addressed by existing research in the field.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Flexible Framework for Runtime Monitoring of System-of-Systems Architectures Automatic Reference Architecture Conformance Checking for SOA-Based Software Systems Systematic Architectural Decision Management, A Process-Based Approach Lessons Learned from Safety-Critical Software-Based Automation Architectures of Nuclear Power Plants Agile Software Architecture in Advanced Data Analytics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1