儿童如何理解并发漫画:来自LOFI和HIFI原型的经验

Mikael Kindborg
{"title":"儿童如何理解并发漫画:来自LOFI和HIFI原型的经验","authors":"Mikael Kindborg","doi":"10.1109/HCC.2001.995264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a study of how ten to eleven year old children understand program representations based on comic strips, it turned out that narrative interpretations were more common when using a low fidelity paper prototype than when using a high fidelity computer prototype. One explanation for this is that a computer prototype \"sets the rules\" to a much greater extent than a paper prototype, thus narrowing the set of plausible interpretations.","PeriodicalId":438014,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings IEEE Symposia on Human-Centric Computing Languages and Environments (Cat. No.01TH8587)","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How children understand concurrent comics: experiences from LOFI and HIFI prototypes\",\"authors\":\"Mikael Kindborg\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/HCC.2001.995264\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In a study of how ten to eleven year old children understand program representations based on comic strips, it turned out that narrative interpretations were more common when using a low fidelity paper prototype than when using a high fidelity computer prototype. One explanation for this is that a computer prototype \\\"sets the rules\\\" to a much greater extent than a paper prototype, thus narrowing the set of plausible interpretations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":438014,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings IEEE Symposia on Human-Centric Computing Languages and Environments (Cat. No.01TH8587)\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings IEEE Symposia on Human-Centric Computing Languages and Environments (Cat. No.01TH8587)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/HCC.2001.995264\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings IEEE Symposia on Human-Centric Computing Languages and Environments (Cat. No.01TH8587)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/HCC.2001.995264","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

在一项关于10到11岁儿童如何理解基于连环漫画的程序表示的研究中,结果表明,使用低保真纸原型比使用高保真电脑原型时,叙事解释更常见。对此的一种解释是,与纸上原型相比,计算机原型在更大程度上“设定了规则”,从而缩小了合理解释的范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How children understand concurrent comics: experiences from LOFI and HIFI prototypes
In a study of how ten to eleven year old children understand program representations based on comic strips, it turned out that narrative interpretations were more common when using a low fidelity paper prototype than when using a high fidelity computer prototype. One explanation for this is that a computer prototype "sets the rules" to a much greater extent than a paper prototype, thus narrowing the set of plausible interpretations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
New paradigm for developing software for E-business Chinese whispers. Semiotically mediating between idea and program How children understand concurrent comics: experiences from LOFI and HIFI prototypes The ptolemy II framework for visual languages Processing UML models with visual scripts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1