基于超分布的商业模式中的关键假设——来自用户视角的经验证据

S. Ahrens, T. Hess, T. Pfister, B. Freese
{"title":"基于超分布的商业模式中的关键假设——来自用户视角的经验证据","authors":"S. Ahrens, T. Hess, T. Pfister, B. Freese","doi":"10.1109/HICSS.2008.106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Superdistribution is not new to the content industries. Quite a few suppliers of digital content have started to implement this concept already. Be it to share bandwidth and storage as it is mainly the case for movies or to spread content faster by stimulating the user to engage in direct marketing actions to promote content as it is true for the music industry. Still, (illegal) peer-to-peer file sharing is by far more popular than the manifold legal offers. We created a prototype equipped with superdistribution and domain sharing implementations as well as a revenue sharing incentive scheme. Applying the triangulation method we tested and evaluated these concepts. Results indicate that superdistribution by itself is not likely the remedy for legal content dissemination. Farther revenue sharing does not work well as an incentive within social networks consisting of close friends.","PeriodicalId":328874,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2008)","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Critical Assumptions in Superdistribution Based Business Models Empirical Evidence  from the User Perspective\",\"authors\":\"S. Ahrens, T. Hess, T. Pfister, B. Freese\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/HICSS.2008.106\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Superdistribution is not new to the content industries. Quite a few suppliers of digital content have started to implement this concept already. Be it to share bandwidth and storage as it is mainly the case for movies or to spread content faster by stimulating the user to engage in direct marketing actions to promote content as it is true for the music industry. Still, (illegal) peer-to-peer file sharing is by far more popular than the manifold legal offers. We created a prototype equipped with superdistribution and domain sharing implementations as well as a revenue sharing incentive scheme. Applying the triangulation method we tested and evaluated these concepts. Results indicate that superdistribution by itself is not likely the remedy for legal content dissemination. Farther revenue sharing does not work well as an incentive within social networks consisting of close friends.\",\"PeriodicalId\":328874,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2008)\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-01-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2008)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2008.106\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2008)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2008.106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

超级分销对内容产业来说并不新鲜。相当多的数字内容供应商已经开始实施这一概念。无论是共享带宽和存储(主要是电影),还是通过刺激用户参与直接营销活动来推广内容(如音乐产业)来更快地传播内容。尽管如此,(非法的)点对点文件共享远比各种合法提供的服务更受欢迎。我们创建了一个原型,配备了超级分布和领域共享实现以及收入共享激励方案。我们运用三角测量法对这些概念进行了测试和评估。结果表明,超分发本身不可能是对合法内容传播的补救措施。在由亲密朋友组成的社交网络中,进一步的收入分享并不能起到很好的激励作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Critical Assumptions in Superdistribution Based Business Models Empirical Evidence  from the User Perspective
Superdistribution is not new to the content industries. Quite a few suppliers of digital content have started to implement this concept already. Be it to share bandwidth and storage as it is mainly the case for movies or to spread content faster by stimulating the user to engage in direct marketing actions to promote content as it is true for the music industry. Still, (illegal) peer-to-peer file sharing is by far more popular than the manifold legal offers. We created a prototype equipped with superdistribution and domain sharing implementations as well as a revenue sharing incentive scheme. Applying the triangulation method we tested and evaluated these concepts. Results indicate that superdistribution by itself is not likely the remedy for legal content dissemination. Farther revenue sharing does not work well as an incentive within social networks consisting of close friends.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Introduction to collaboration issues in cross-organizational and cross-border IS/IT minitrack Resonance Marketing in the Age of the Truly Informed Consumer: Changes in Corporate Strategy Resulting from Changes in Customer Behavior Modes of Governance in Business Process Outsourcing: Executive versus Market's Perspective Social Exchange Online: Public Conversations in the Blogosphere InterDataNet: Interoperability Framework to Support Collaborative Creation and Management of Official Documents in e-Government Processes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1