保护传统文化表现形式

K. Breemen
{"title":"保护传统文化表现形式","authors":"K. Breemen","doi":"10.4324/9781315189925-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter analyses the issue of protection of traditional cultural expressions (TCEs) as one that evokes questions across legal boundaries, notably in the context of copyright law and human rights law. Particular attention is paid to the tensions and opportunities that follow from the relationship between indigenous and non-indigenous views on the topic. As such, it becomes clear that an interdisciplinary perspective is imperative, and that the study of indigenous peoples’ rights is particularly useful for a researcher of information law such as the present author.","PeriodicalId":103459,"journal":{"name":"Critical Indigenous Rights Studies","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Protecting traditional cultural expressions\",\"authors\":\"K. Breemen\",\"doi\":\"10.4324/9781315189925-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter analyses the issue of protection of traditional cultural expressions (TCEs) as one that evokes questions across legal boundaries, notably in the context of copyright law and human rights law. Particular attention is paid to the tensions and opportunities that follow from the relationship between indigenous and non-indigenous views on the topic. As such, it becomes clear that an interdisciplinary perspective is imperative, and that the study of indigenous peoples’ rights is particularly useful for a researcher of information law such as the present author.\",\"PeriodicalId\":103459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Indigenous Rights Studies\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Indigenous Rights Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315189925-6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Indigenous Rights Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315189925-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本章分析了传统文化表现形式(TCEs)的保护问题,认为这一问题引发了跨越法律界限的问题,特别是在版权法和人权法的背景下。特别注意土著和非土著对这个问题的看法之间的关系所引起的紧张和机会。因此,很明显,跨学科的观点是必要的,对土著人民权利的研究对像本作者这样的信息法研究人员特别有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Protecting traditional cultural expressions
This chapter analyses the issue of protection of traditional cultural expressions (TCEs) as one that evokes questions across legal boundaries, notably in the context of copyright law and human rights law. Particular attention is paid to the tensions and opportunities that follow from the relationship between indigenous and non-indigenous views on the topic. As such, it becomes clear that an interdisciplinary perspective is imperative, and that the study of indigenous peoples’ rights is particularly useful for a researcher of information law such as the present author.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Protecting traditional cultural expressions A dual perspective on the right to enjoy the benefits of scientific progress Politics of oneness and Twa’s struggle for land Indigeneity vs development Legislating coordination and cooperation mechanisms between indigenous and ordinary jurisdictions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1