瑞典最高行政法院:瑞典集团关于不可抵扣进项增值税的规定既不符合增值税指令,也不符合设立自由

Katia Cejie
{"title":"瑞典最高行政法院:瑞典集团关于不可抵扣进项增值税的规定既不符合增值税指令,也不符合设立自由","authors":"Katia Cejie","doi":"10.5235/20488432.2.2.154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Swedish Supreme Administrative Court (SAC) recently delivered its judgments in two cases regarding the possibility of transferring the non-deductible input VAT in a cross-border situation. According to the Swedish VAT Act this was only possible in non-cross-border situations. Basing its judgments on EU-law, the SAC decided that Swedish law was an unlawful implementation of the VAT Directive as well as a breach of the fundamental freedom of establishment in the TFEU.","PeriodicalId":114680,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of VAT/GST Law","volume":"151 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Swedish Supreme Administrative Court: The Swedish Group rule on non-deductible input VAT complies with neither the VAT Directive nor the freedom of establishment\",\"authors\":\"Katia Cejie\",\"doi\":\"10.5235/20488432.2.2.154\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Swedish Supreme Administrative Court (SAC) recently delivered its judgments in two cases regarding the possibility of transferring the non-deductible input VAT in a cross-border situation. According to the Swedish VAT Act this was only possible in non-cross-border situations. Basing its judgments on EU-law, the SAC decided that Swedish law was an unlawful implementation of the VAT Directive as well as a breach of the fundamental freedom of establishment in the TFEU.\",\"PeriodicalId\":114680,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of VAT/GST Law\",\"volume\":\"151 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of VAT/GST Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5235/20488432.2.2.154\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of VAT/GST Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5235/20488432.2.2.154","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

瑞典最高行政法院(SAC)最近就两起案件作出判决,涉及在跨境情况下转移不可抵扣的进项增值税的可能性。根据瑞典增值税法案,这只有在非跨境情况下才有可能。SAC基于欧盟法律的判断,认为瑞典法律是对增值税指令的非法实施,违反了在欧盟设立企业的基本自由。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Swedish Supreme Administrative Court: The Swedish Group rule on non-deductible input VAT complies with neither the VAT Directive nor the freedom of establishment
The Swedish Supreme Administrative Court (SAC) recently delivered its judgments in two cases regarding the possibility of transferring the non-deductible input VAT in a cross-border situation. According to the Swedish VAT Act this was only possible in non-cross-border situations. Basing its judgments on EU-law, the SAC decided that Swedish law was an unlawful implementation of the VAT Directive as well as a breach of the fundamental freedom of establishment in the TFEU.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Equality under State aid rules and VAT The direct and immediate link with specialised services contracts as a measure for the right to deduct input VAT and the uncertainty in European tax law VAT deduction and member state sovereignty: (still) a good idea? EU VAT at the dawn of the Fourth Industrial Revolution* VAT information asymmetries in the context of intra-EU trade in goods
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1