教师的教育是否会影响学生的表现?

K. Murillo, E. Rocha, A. Freitas, C. Pardo
{"title":"教师的教育是否会影响学生的表现?","authors":"K. Murillo, E. Rocha, A. Freitas, C. Pardo","doi":"10.21125/EDULEARN.2019.1423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Increasingly questions arise regarding the educational process and which factors are of key importance to increase the quality of education. According to Clare Kosnik, \"Quality in education depends directly on the quality of teachers and the quality of the curriculum.\" However, to what extent is this true? It is known that, many agents intervene in the educational process as the quality of curriculum, students, teachers, teaching methods, governance, financing, evaluation and linkage with other apex institutions. In this sense, it is interesting to analyse how the quality of education should be evaluated, as a direct consequence of teacher training, the results of students, the conditions and strategies in which teaching is developed, or an evaluation in which all do these aspects interfere. This work aims to address one of the above questions, which causes major debates among educational analysts: to what extent do education level and research outcomes of teachers interfere with the skills and performance of higher education students? Specifically, we examined 165 higher education institutions (HEI), public and private, in Colombia in the year of 2016. The Colombian HEI system is composed of technical institutes focused on vocational education, university institutions focused on technological education, and universities focused on under-graduate degrees (e.g. bachelor or diploma) and post-graduate degrees (e.g. specialisation, master or doctorate). The data include twelve variables: six variables related with teacher education level and research outcomes (i.e. teachers with specialisation, teachers with masters, teachers with doctorate, teachers without postgraduate, number of citations and intellectual production score) and six variables related with student performance (i.e. quantitative reasoning, critical reading, written communication, employability and postgraduate ingresses). A canonical correlation analysis (CCA) was executed to explore relationship between academic qualification of teachers of higher education and performance of their students, aiming to identify the main canonical structures between them. Previously a methodology filtering were used to deal with outliers and Box-Cox transformations were applied to transform non-normal variables in near normal ones. Statistical tests based on Wilks Lambda, Hotelling-Lawley Trace, Pillai-Bartlett Trace and Roy's Largest Root was applied in order to test for statistical significance of canonical correlation coefficients. These approaches identify the degree and the most relevant relationships between variables of teacher training/research and variables of student performance in higher education.","PeriodicalId":414865,"journal":{"name":"EDULEARN19 Proceedings","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"DOES TEACHER'S EDUCATION AFFECT STUDENT PERFORMANCE?\",\"authors\":\"K. Murillo, E. Rocha, A. Freitas, C. Pardo\",\"doi\":\"10.21125/EDULEARN.2019.1423\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Increasingly questions arise regarding the educational process and which factors are of key importance to increase the quality of education. According to Clare Kosnik, \\\"Quality in education depends directly on the quality of teachers and the quality of the curriculum.\\\" However, to what extent is this true? It is known that, many agents intervene in the educational process as the quality of curriculum, students, teachers, teaching methods, governance, financing, evaluation and linkage with other apex institutions. In this sense, it is interesting to analyse how the quality of education should be evaluated, as a direct consequence of teacher training, the results of students, the conditions and strategies in which teaching is developed, or an evaluation in which all do these aspects interfere. This work aims to address one of the above questions, which causes major debates among educational analysts: to what extent do education level and research outcomes of teachers interfere with the skills and performance of higher education students? Specifically, we examined 165 higher education institutions (HEI), public and private, in Colombia in the year of 2016. The Colombian HEI system is composed of technical institutes focused on vocational education, university institutions focused on technological education, and universities focused on under-graduate degrees (e.g. bachelor or diploma) and post-graduate degrees (e.g. specialisation, master or doctorate). The data include twelve variables: six variables related with teacher education level and research outcomes (i.e. teachers with specialisation, teachers with masters, teachers with doctorate, teachers without postgraduate, number of citations and intellectual production score) and six variables related with student performance (i.e. quantitative reasoning, critical reading, written communication, employability and postgraduate ingresses). A canonical correlation analysis (CCA) was executed to explore relationship between academic qualification of teachers of higher education and performance of their students, aiming to identify the main canonical structures between them. Previously a methodology filtering were used to deal with outliers and Box-Cox transformations were applied to transform non-normal variables in near normal ones. Statistical tests based on Wilks Lambda, Hotelling-Lawley Trace, Pillai-Bartlett Trace and Roy's Largest Root was applied in order to test for statistical significance of canonical correlation coefficients. These approaches identify the degree and the most relevant relationships between variables of teacher training/research and variables of student performance in higher education.\",\"PeriodicalId\":414865,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EDULEARN19 Proceedings\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EDULEARN19 Proceedings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21125/EDULEARN.2019.1423\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EDULEARN19 Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21125/EDULEARN.2019.1423","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

关于教育过程和哪些因素对提高教育质量至关重要的问题越来越多。克莱尔·科斯尼克说:“教育的质量直接取决于教师的质量和课程的质量。”然而,这在多大程度上是正确的呢?据了解,许多中介介入教育过程,如课程质量、学生、教师、教学方法、治理、融资、评估以及与其他顶尖机构的联动。从这个意义上说,分析如何评估教育质量是很有趣的,作为教师培训的直接结果,学生的成绩,教学发展的条件和策略,或者所有这些方面都相互影响的评估。这项工作旨在解决上述问题之一,这引起了教育分析家的主要争论:教师的教育水平和研究成果在多大程度上干扰了高等教育学生的技能和表现?具体来说,我们调查了2016年哥伦比亚165所公立和私立高等教育机构(HEI)。哥伦比亚高等教育系统由专注于职业教育的技术学院、专注于技术教育的大学机构和专注于本科学位(如学士或文凭)和研究生学位(如专业、硕士或博士学位)的大学组成。数据包括12个变量:6个与教师教育水平和研究成果相关的变量(即专业教师、硕士教师、博士教师、非研究生教师、引用次数和智力生产分数)和6个与学生表现相关的变量(即定量推理、批判性阅读、书面交流、就业能力和研究生入学)。本文采用典型相关分析(canonical correlation analysis, CCA)探讨了高等教育教师学历与学生成绩之间的关系,旨在找出两者之间的主要典型结构。以前使用滤波方法处理异常值,并应用Box-Cox变换将非正态变量转换为近正态变量。采用基于Wilks Lambda、Hotelling-Lawley Trace、pilllai - bartlett Trace和Roy’s Largest Root的统计检验来检验典型相关系数的统计显著性。这些方法确定了高等教育中教师培训/研究变量与学生表现变量之间的程度和最相关的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
DOES TEACHER'S EDUCATION AFFECT STUDENT PERFORMANCE?
Increasingly questions arise regarding the educational process and which factors are of key importance to increase the quality of education. According to Clare Kosnik, "Quality in education depends directly on the quality of teachers and the quality of the curriculum." However, to what extent is this true? It is known that, many agents intervene in the educational process as the quality of curriculum, students, teachers, teaching methods, governance, financing, evaluation and linkage with other apex institutions. In this sense, it is interesting to analyse how the quality of education should be evaluated, as a direct consequence of teacher training, the results of students, the conditions and strategies in which teaching is developed, or an evaluation in which all do these aspects interfere. This work aims to address one of the above questions, which causes major debates among educational analysts: to what extent do education level and research outcomes of teachers interfere with the skills and performance of higher education students? Specifically, we examined 165 higher education institutions (HEI), public and private, in Colombia in the year of 2016. The Colombian HEI system is composed of technical institutes focused on vocational education, university institutions focused on technological education, and universities focused on under-graduate degrees (e.g. bachelor or diploma) and post-graduate degrees (e.g. specialisation, master or doctorate). The data include twelve variables: six variables related with teacher education level and research outcomes (i.e. teachers with specialisation, teachers with masters, teachers with doctorate, teachers without postgraduate, number of citations and intellectual production score) and six variables related with student performance (i.e. quantitative reasoning, critical reading, written communication, employability and postgraduate ingresses). A canonical correlation analysis (CCA) was executed to explore relationship between academic qualification of teachers of higher education and performance of their students, aiming to identify the main canonical structures between them. Previously a methodology filtering were used to deal with outliers and Box-Cox transformations were applied to transform non-normal variables in near normal ones. Statistical tests based on Wilks Lambda, Hotelling-Lawley Trace, Pillai-Bartlett Trace and Roy's Largest Root was applied in order to test for statistical significance of canonical correlation coefficients. These approaches identify the degree and the most relevant relationships between variables of teacher training/research and variables of student performance in higher education.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ACADEMIC MOTIVATION OF PUPILS IN REGULAR AND WALDORF SCHOOLS WE CAN DO IT: MASS TRAINING UNDERGRADUATES IN LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM USAGE RANKING THE BALANCED SCORECARD GOALS OF HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS USING THE CENTRALITY MEASURES COORDINATION PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING DEGREES DIMENSIONS OF INTERPERSONAL TEACHERS’ SKILLS IN SCHOOL ENVIRONMENT
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1