Ad Sinodinou, D. Gillam, N. Mordan, David G. Gillam
{"title":"选定引物和消失物对开放牙本质小管的影响:一项扫描电镜研究","authors":"Ad Sinodinou, D. Gillam, N. Mordan, David G. Gillam","doi":"10.31038/jdmr.2023612","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dentine sensitivity (DS) is a common painful condition affecting teeth. The exact mechanism of transmission of an environmental stimulus across dentine is not fully understood; currently the most accepted theory is the hydrodynamic theory as proposed initially by Brannstrom. Treatment has been concentrated on either reducing the dentine fluid flow by occlusion of tubule openings, or altering the pulpal sensory nerve activity preventing transmission of pain to the central nervous system. Aims and Method: The aims of the present in vitro study were to examine the dentine tubule occluding and penetrating properties of selected in-office desensitizing agents (varnishes and primers) using scanning electron microscopy and a dentine disc model. Results: Of the products examined, the fluoride varnishes, Bifluoride 12 and Duraphat, and Cervitec (a chlorhexidine containing varnish) were effective in both occluding and penetrating the dentine tubules. The results from All Bond 2, One Step and Scotchbond primers were superior to those of HEMA group primers, Gluma 3, Gluma CPS and Solobond Plus. Conclusions: These findings suggest a mechanism for the action of these potential desensitising agents and suggest that the tubule penetrating properties may play a role in the longevity of their retention on the tooth. Investigation of surface coverage and tubule penetrating characteristics are both necessary in order to fully evaluate in vitro the desensitising potential of agents claimed to reduce Dentine Sensitivity.","PeriodicalId":326702,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dental and Maxillofacial Research","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Selected Primers and Vanishes on Open Dentine Tubules: An SEM Study\",\"authors\":\"Ad Sinodinou, D. Gillam, N. Mordan, David G. Gillam\",\"doi\":\"10.31038/jdmr.2023612\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Dentine sensitivity (DS) is a common painful condition affecting teeth. The exact mechanism of transmission of an environmental stimulus across dentine is not fully understood; currently the most accepted theory is the hydrodynamic theory as proposed initially by Brannstrom. Treatment has been concentrated on either reducing the dentine fluid flow by occlusion of tubule openings, or altering the pulpal sensory nerve activity preventing transmission of pain to the central nervous system. Aims and Method: The aims of the present in vitro study were to examine the dentine tubule occluding and penetrating properties of selected in-office desensitizing agents (varnishes and primers) using scanning electron microscopy and a dentine disc model. Results: Of the products examined, the fluoride varnishes, Bifluoride 12 and Duraphat, and Cervitec (a chlorhexidine containing varnish) were effective in both occluding and penetrating the dentine tubules. The results from All Bond 2, One Step and Scotchbond primers were superior to those of HEMA group primers, Gluma 3, Gluma CPS and Solobond Plus. Conclusions: These findings suggest a mechanism for the action of these potential desensitising agents and suggest that the tubule penetrating properties may play a role in the longevity of their retention on the tooth. Investigation of surface coverage and tubule penetrating characteristics are both necessary in order to fully evaluate in vitro the desensitising potential of agents claimed to reduce Dentine Sensitivity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":326702,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Dental and Maxillofacial Research\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Dental and Maxillofacial Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31038/jdmr.2023612\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dental and Maxillofacial Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31038/jdmr.2023612","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
牙本质敏感(DS)是一种常见的牙齿疼痛状况。环境刺激跨牙本质传递的确切机制尚不完全清楚;目前最被接受的理论是由Brannstrom最初提出的水动力理论。治疗的重点是通过封堵小管开口来减少牙本质液体的流动,或者改变牙髓感觉神经的活动,防止疼痛传递到中枢神经系统。目的和方法:采用扫描电子显微镜和牙本质盘模型,观察所选择的室内脱敏剂(清漆和底漆)对牙本质小管的堵塞和穿透性能。结果:在检查的产品中,氟化物清漆、bi氟化物12和Duraphat以及Cervitec(一种含氯己定的清漆)对牙本质小管的堵塞和穿透都有效。All Bond 2、One Step和Scotchbond引物的结果优于HEMA组引物、Gluma 3、Gluma CPS和Solobond Plus。结论:这些发现提示了这些潜在的脱敏剂的作用机制,并表明小管穿透特性可能在它们在牙齿上的保留寿命中起作用。为了在体外充分评估降低牙本质敏感性的药物的脱敏潜力,研究表面覆盖和小管穿透特性都是必要的。
Effects of Selected Primers and Vanishes on Open Dentine Tubules: An SEM Study
Dentine sensitivity (DS) is a common painful condition affecting teeth. The exact mechanism of transmission of an environmental stimulus across dentine is not fully understood; currently the most accepted theory is the hydrodynamic theory as proposed initially by Brannstrom. Treatment has been concentrated on either reducing the dentine fluid flow by occlusion of tubule openings, or altering the pulpal sensory nerve activity preventing transmission of pain to the central nervous system. Aims and Method: The aims of the present in vitro study were to examine the dentine tubule occluding and penetrating properties of selected in-office desensitizing agents (varnishes and primers) using scanning electron microscopy and a dentine disc model. Results: Of the products examined, the fluoride varnishes, Bifluoride 12 and Duraphat, and Cervitec (a chlorhexidine containing varnish) were effective in both occluding and penetrating the dentine tubules. The results from All Bond 2, One Step and Scotchbond primers were superior to those of HEMA group primers, Gluma 3, Gluma CPS and Solobond Plus. Conclusions: These findings suggest a mechanism for the action of these potential desensitising agents and suggest that the tubule penetrating properties may play a role in the longevity of their retention on the tooth. Investigation of surface coverage and tubule penetrating characteristics are both necessary in order to fully evaluate in vitro the desensitising potential of agents claimed to reduce Dentine Sensitivity.