根据1995年第12条关于监禁的法律,司法管辖区对麻醉品和精神药物罪犯进行了缓解

Sigit Kamseno
{"title":"根据1995年第12条关于监禁的法律,司法管辖区对麻醉品和精神药物罪犯进行了缓解","authors":"Sigit Kamseno","doi":"10.53363/bureau.v2i2.105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rights of prisoners stipulated in the Law No. 12 of 1995 concerning on correctional. In article 14, it is explicity mentioned some prisoners rights including the right to get remission. The implementation of the entitlement remissions for the prisoners of narcotics and psychotropic crimes and certain criminal offenses categorized as extra ordinary crime regulated in The Government Regulation No. 99 of 2012 on the second amandement of the Goverment Regulation No. 32 of 1999 on the requirement and procedures for the implementation of the prisoners rights. In this government regulation, remission for the prisoners of narcotics and psychotropic cases and specific criminal acts enforced differently from other general crimes. Policy about tightening these remissions raise the pro and contra in the society. In the one hand, those who agree on the policy argue that the perpretactors of narcotics and psychotropic cases are not feasible to be given remission, because narcotics and psychotropic are extra ordinary crimes. This can evoke deterrent effect. On the other hand, people whose counter with this policy assume that remission is a right of prisoners that have been regulated by laws. Restrictions remissions by tightening of the requirement for prisoners of certain criminal acts are form discrimination that violated human rights. This research aim are finding out on the the implementation of remission in Prison of Serang and how it is answered based on human right perspective. This research is a normative legsl research bu using a qualitative method. Collecting data with interview with The official of Prison Serang and some narcotics prisoners. The result of this research concludes that remission for the prisoners of certain criminal acts categorized as a extra ordinary crime including the narcotics and psychotropic cases  enforced differently  regulated specifically in the Government Regulation No.99 of 2012 in addition to meet the requirement of good behavior, inmates must also have been serving a criminal sentence of more than 6 (six) months, must also be willing to cooperate with law inforcement to help dismantle the criminal case that done by them, also should have paid the full of compensation in accordance with the court decision. Remission is a fundamental rights that must be granted. And the prison of Serang have been conduct the implementation for the prisoners of narcotics and psychotropic based on Law No.12 of 1995.  There is no discriminatory treatment for the prisoners to get their rights for remissions. The implementation of remission rights in Prison of Serang is not violated against the human rights","PeriodicalId":345865,"journal":{"name":"Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"TINJAUAN YURIDIS PEMBERIAN REMISI BAGI NARAPIDANA TINDAK PIDANA NARKOTIKA DAN PSIKOTROPIKA DITINJAU DARI UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 12 TAHUN 1995 TENTANG PEMASYARAKATAN\",\"authors\":\"Sigit Kamseno\",\"doi\":\"10.53363/bureau.v2i2.105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Rights of prisoners stipulated in the Law No. 12 of 1995 concerning on correctional. In article 14, it is explicity mentioned some prisoners rights including the right to get remission. The implementation of the entitlement remissions for the prisoners of narcotics and psychotropic crimes and certain criminal offenses categorized as extra ordinary crime regulated in The Government Regulation No. 99 of 2012 on the second amandement of the Goverment Regulation No. 32 of 1999 on the requirement and procedures for the implementation of the prisoners rights. In this government regulation, remission for the prisoners of narcotics and psychotropic cases and specific criminal acts enforced differently from other general crimes. Policy about tightening these remissions raise the pro and contra in the society. In the one hand, those who agree on the policy argue that the perpretactors of narcotics and psychotropic cases are not feasible to be given remission, because narcotics and psychotropic are extra ordinary crimes. This can evoke deterrent effect. On the other hand, people whose counter with this policy assume that remission is a right of prisoners that have been regulated by laws. Restrictions remissions by tightening of the requirement for prisoners of certain criminal acts are form discrimination that violated human rights. This research aim are finding out on the the implementation of remission in Prison of Serang and how it is answered based on human right perspective. This research is a normative legsl research bu using a qualitative method. Collecting data with interview with The official of Prison Serang and some narcotics prisoners. The result of this research concludes that remission for the prisoners of certain criminal acts categorized as a extra ordinary crime including the narcotics and psychotropic cases  enforced differently  regulated specifically in the Government Regulation No.99 of 2012 in addition to meet the requirement of good behavior, inmates must also have been serving a criminal sentence of more than 6 (six) months, must also be willing to cooperate with law inforcement to help dismantle the criminal case that done by them, also should have paid the full of compensation in accordance with the court decision. Remission is a fundamental rights that must be granted. And the prison of Serang have been conduct the implementation for the prisoners of narcotics and psychotropic based on Law No.12 of 1995.  There is no discriminatory treatment for the prisoners to get their rights for remissions. The implementation of remission rights in Prison of Serang is not violated against the human rights\",\"PeriodicalId\":345865,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53363/bureau.v2i2.105\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53363/bureau.v2i2.105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

1995年关于惩教的第12号法律规定的囚犯权利。第14条明确提到囚犯的一些权利,包括获得减刑的权利。执行麻醉品和精神药物犯罪以及归类为特别普通犯罪的某些刑事犯罪的囚犯的权利减免,这些罪行在《2012年第99号政府条例》和《1999年第32号政府条例》的第二次修订中规定。在这一政府条例中,对麻醉药品和精神药品案件和特定犯罪行为的囚犯的赦免与其他一般犯罪的执行不同。收紧这些排放的政策引起了社会上的赞成和反对。一方面,赞成该政策的人认为,毒品和精神药物案件的肇事者不可能得到赦免,因为毒品和精神药物是非常普通的犯罪。这可以引起威慑作用。另一方面,反对这一政策的人认为减刑是法律规定的囚犯的权利。通过收紧对某些犯罪行为的囚犯的要求来限制和减轻是一种侵犯人权的歧视。本研究旨在从人权的角度探讨雪朗监狱的减刑实施情况及如何回答。本研究是一项规范性法律研究,但采用了定性方法。通过采访雪朗监狱的官员和一些毒品犯来收集数据。本研究结果表明,对于2012年第99号《政府条例》中特别规定的麻醉药品和精神药品案件等特殊犯罪行为的减刑,除满足行为良好的要求外,还必须已服刑6个月以上。还必须愿意配合执法部门协助拆除由他们所做的刑事案件,还应当按照法院的判决支付全额赔偿金。赦免是一项必须被授予的基本权利。Serang监狱根据1995年第12号法律对麻醉药品和精神药品的囚犯进行了实施。囚犯在获得假释权利方面不存在任何歧视性待遇。在雪朗监狱实施减刑权并没有侵犯人权
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
TINJAUAN YURIDIS PEMBERIAN REMISI BAGI NARAPIDANA TINDAK PIDANA NARKOTIKA DAN PSIKOTROPIKA DITINJAU DARI UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 12 TAHUN 1995 TENTANG PEMASYARAKATAN
Rights of prisoners stipulated in the Law No. 12 of 1995 concerning on correctional. In article 14, it is explicity mentioned some prisoners rights including the right to get remission. The implementation of the entitlement remissions for the prisoners of narcotics and psychotropic crimes and certain criminal offenses categorized as extra ordinary crime regulated in The Government Regulation No. 99 of 2012 on the second amandement of the Goverment Regulation No. 32 of 1999 on the requirement and procedures for the implementation of the prisoners rights. In this government regulation, remission for the prisoners of narcotics and psychotropic cases and specific criminal acts enforced differently from other general crimes. Policy about tightening these remissions raise the pro and contra in the society. In the one hand, those who agree on the policy argue that the perpretactors of narcotics and psychotropic cases are not feasible to be given remission, because narcotics and psychotropic are extra ordinary crimes. This can evoke deterrent effect. On the other hand, people whose counter with this policy assume that remission is a right of prisoners that have been regulated by laws. Restrictions remissions by tightening of the requirement for prisoners of certain criminal acts are form discrimination that violated human rights. This research aim are finding out on the the implementation of remission in Prison of Serang and how it is answered based on human right perspective. This research is a normative legsl research bu using a qualitative method. Collecting data with interview with The official of Prison Serang and some narcotics prisoners. The result of this research concludes that remission for the prisoners of certain criminal acts categorized as a extra ordinary crime including the narcotics and psychotropic cases  enforced differently  regulated specifically in the Government Regulation No.99 of 2012 in addition to meet the requirement of good behavior, inmates must also have been serving a criminal sentence of more than 6 (six) months, must also be willing to cooperate with law inforcement to help dismantle the criminal case that done by them, also should have paid the full of compensation in accordance with the court decision. Remission is a fundamental rights that must be granted. And the prison of Serang have been conduct the implementation for the prisoners of narcotics and psychotropic based on Law No.12 of 1995.  There is no discriminatory treatment for the prisoners to get their rights for remissions. The implementation of remission rights in Prison of Serang is not violated against the human rights
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
PEMIDANAAN TERHADAP PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA MELARIKAN WANITA YANG BELUM CUKUP UMUR PUTUSAN /36/Pid.B/2019 PN GST TINDAK PIDANA PENCEMARAN NAMA BAIK BERDASARKAN PASAL 310 KUHP ANALISIS HUKUM KEBIJAKAN KELEBIHAN DIMENSI DAN KELEBIHAN MUATAN TERHADAP DEMONSTRAN GERAKAN SOPIR JAWA TIMUR ANALISIS HUKUM KONTEN NEGATIF DI PLATFORM YOUTUBE DI INDONESIA KEKUATAN PEMBUKTIAN ALAT BUKTI ELEKTRONIK DALAM PERADILAN PIDANA E-LITIGASI BERLANDASKAN NILAI KEADILAN
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1