语言使用的差异:来自工作和人才寻找的见解

Bahar Salehi, B. Kazimipour, Timothy Baldwin
{"title":"语言使用的差异:来自工作和人才寻找的见解","authors":"Bahar Salehi, B. Kazimipour, Timothy Baldwin","doi":"10.1145/3372124.3372127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Search platforms can have more than one type of user, e.g., those who provide and those who consume content. As an example, in a job/talent search platform, content providers are: (1) job seekers who provide CVs, and (2) hirers who provide job advertisements; content consumers, on the other hand, are: (3) job seekers searching for specific jobs, and (4) hirers/recruiters searching for candidates to fill particular positions. As a result, there are four types of users, each with potentially different patterns of language use. In this paper, we compare the language used by different groups of users in job/talent search, by way of word embeddings pre-trained over documents associated with distinct types of users. In doing so, we investigate whether there are systematic shifts/ mismatches in vocabulary or the use of the same term, and consider the implications for an integrated search solution. Our experiments unearth significant differences in language use, but also that there is a strong agreement between the results of our intrinsic and extrinsic comparisons of word embeddings.","PeriodicalId":145556,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 24th Australasian Document Computing Symposium","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differences in language use: Insights from job and talent search\",\"authors\":\"Bahar Salehi, B. Kazimipour, Timothy Baldwin\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3372124.3372127\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Search platforms can have more than one type of user, e.g., those who provide and those who consume content. As an example, in a job/talent search platform, content providers are: (1) job seekers who provide CVs, and (2) hirers who provide job advertisements; content consumers, on the other hand, are: (3) job seekers searching for specific jobs, and (4) hirers/recruiters searching for candidates to fill particular positions. As a result, there are four types of users, each with potentially different patterns of language use. In this paper, we compare the language used by different groups of users in job/talent search, by way of word embeddings pre-trained over documents associated with distinct types of users. In doing so, we investigate whether there are systematic shifts/ mismatches in vocabulary or the use of the same term, and consider the implications for an integrated search solution. Our experiments unearth significant differences in language use, but also that there is a strong agreement between the results of our intrinsic and extrinsic comparisons of word embeddings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":145556,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 24th Australasian Document Computing Symposium\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 24th Australasian Document Computing Symposium\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3372124.3372127\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 24th Australasian Document Computing Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3372124.3372127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

搜索平台可以有多种类型的用户,例如,提供内容的用户和消费内容的用户。例如,在求职/人才搜索平台中,内容提供者是:(1)提供简历的求职者,(2)提供招聘广告的招聘者;另一方面,内容消费者是:(3)寻找特定工作的求职者,(4)寻找填补特定职位的候选人的雇主/招聘人员。因此,有四种类型的用户,每种用户都有可能不同的语言使用模式。在本文中,我们通过对与不同类型用户相关的文档进行预训练的词嵌入,比较了不同用户群体在工作/人才搜索中使用的语言。在此过程中,我们调查了词汇表或相同术语的使用中是否存在系统性的变化/不匹配,并考虑了集成搜索解决方案的含义。我们的实验揭示了语言使用的显著差异,但同时也表明,我们对词嵌入的内在和外在比较结果之间存在着强烈的一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Differences in language use: Insights from job and talent search
Search platforms can have more than one type of user, e.g., those who provide and those who consume content. As an example, in a job/talent search platform, content providers are: (1) job seekers who provide CVs, and (2) hirers who provide job advertisements; content consumers, on the other hand, are: (3) job seekers searching for specific jobs, and (4) hirers/recruiters searching for candidates to fill particular positions. As a result, there are four types of users, each with potentially different patterns of language use. In this paper, we compare the language used by different groups of users in job/talent search, by way of word embeddings pre-trained over documents associated with distinct types of users. In doing so, we investigate whether there are systematic shifts/ mismatches in vocabulary or the use of the same term, and consider the implications for an integrated search solution. Our experiments unearth significant differences in language use, but also that there is a strong agreement between the results of our intrinsic and extrinsic comparisons of word embeddings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Differences in language use: Insights from job and talent search Proceedings of the 24th Australasian Document Computing Symposium Taking Risks with Confidence Towards Automatically Classifying Case Law Citation Treatment Using Neural Networks Character Profiling in Low-Resource Language Documents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1