急性冠脉综合征后2型糖尿病患者是否应优先治疗?

J. Davies
{"title":"急性冠脉综合征后2型糖尿病患者是否应优先治疗?","authors":"J. Davies","doi":"10.33590/emjdiabet/10310596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This symposium aimed to address the current issues in the management of patients with Type 2 diabetes (T2D) post-acute coronary syndrome (ACS), bringing together the views of both cardiologists and diabetologists. T2D increases the risk of ACS and is associated with a poorer prognosis for these patients. Although guidelines provide comprehensive recommendations for patients with ACS, specific guidance is lacking following hospital discharge for those with concomitant T2D. As a result, these patients receive suboptimal treatment compared with patients without T2D. The cardiovascular (CV) benefits of intensive glucose lowering alone for those with T2D are uncertain. However, knowledge of the CV safety profiles of available therapies helps diabetologists to provide individualised treatment for their patients. Currently, three studies have reported on the CV safety of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors in patients with T2D. However, active inclusion of patients who are both post-ACS (15–90 days) and at high risk of CV disease (CVD) is rare. Only the DPP-4 alogliptin has been assessed in a CV safety outcome study in patients with this specific profile.","PeriodicalId":418035,"journal":{"name":"EMJ Diabetes","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Should Type 2 Diabetes Management Be More of a Priority in Post-Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients?\",\"authors\":\"J. Davies\",\"doi\":\"10.33590/emjdiabet/10310596\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This symposium aimed to address the current issues in the management of patients with Type 2 diabetes (T2D) post-acute coronary syndrome (ACS), bringing together the views of both cardiologists and diabetologists. T2D increases the risk of ACS and is associated with a poorer prognosis for these patients. Although guidelines provide comprehensive recommendations for patients with ACS, specific guidance is lacking following hospital discharge for those with concomitant T2D. As a result, these patients receive suboptimal treatment compared with patients without T2D. The cardiovascular (CV) benefits of intensive glucose lowering alone for those with T2D are uncertain. However, knowledge of the CV safety profiles of available therapies helps diabetologists to provide individualised treatment for their patients. Currently, three studies have reported on the CV safety of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors in patients with T2D. However, active inclusion of patients who are both post-ACS (15–90 days) and at high risk of CV disease (CVD) is rare. Only the DPP-4 alogliptin has been assessed in a CV safety outcome study in patients with this specific profile.\",\"PeriodicalId\":418035,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EMJ Diabetes\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-11-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EMJ Diabetes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33590/emjdiabet/10310596\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EMJ Diabetes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33590/emjdiabet/10310596","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本次研讨会旨在讨论当前2型糖尿病(T2D)急性冠脉综合征(ACS)后患者的管理问题,汇集心脏病专家和糖尿病专家的观点。T2D增加了ACS的风险,并与这些患者的预后较差有关。尽管指南为ACS患者提供了全面的建议,但对于合并T2D的患者,在出院后缺乏具体的指导。因此,与没有T2D的患者相比,这些患者接受的治疗并不理想。单独强化降糖对T2D患者的心血管(CV)益处尚不确定。然而,了解现有治疗方法的心血管安全概况有助于糖尿病医生为患者提供个性化治疗。目前,有三项研究报道了二肽基肽酶-4 (DPP-4)抑制剂在T2D患者中的CV安全性。然而,积极纳入acs后(15-90天)和高危心血管疾病(CVD)的患者是罕见的。只有DPP-4阿格列汀在具有这种特殊特征的患者的心血管安全性结局研究中被评估过。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Should Type 2 Diabetes Management Be More of a Priority in Post-Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients?
This symposium aimed to address the current issues in the management of patients with Type 2 diabetes (T2D) post-acute coronary syndrome (ACS), bringing together the views of both cardiologists and diabetologists. T2D increases the risk of ACS and is associated with a poorer prognosis for these patients. Although guidelines provide comprehensive recommendations for patients with ACS, specific guidance is lacking following hospital discharge for those with concomitant T2D. As a result, these patients receive suboptimal treatment compared with patients without T2D. The cardiovascular (CV) benefits of intensive glucose lowering alone for those with T2D are uncertain. However, knowledge of the CV safety profiles of available therapies helps diabetologists to provide individualised treatment for their patients. Currently, three studies have reported on the CV safety of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors in patients with T2D. However, active inclusion of patients who are both post-ACS (15–90 days) and at high risk of CV disease (CVD) is rare. Only the DPP-4 alogliptin has been assessed in a CV safety outcome study in patients with this specific profile.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Review of the 59th European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) Annual Meeting Preconception Care for Individuals with Diabetes EASD 2023 Abstract Highlights Hidden Complication of Obesity and Diabetes: Is It Time to Put More Focus on Fatty Liver? Mean Platelet Volume in Type 2 Diabetes: Correlation with Poor Glycaemic Control
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1