海事法院的判决对第一、第二、第三和第17区地区劳工法院的影响。

Gustavo Magno Felipe Franco, André Panno Beirão
{"title":"海事法院的判决对第一、第二、第三和第17区地区劳工法院的影响。","authors":"Gustavo Magno Felipe Franco, André Panno Beirão","doi":"10.30749/2674-9734.v1n1a260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After a long period of controversy and doubts about the role of the Maritime Court within our legal system, the doctrine has finally settled it as a proof of relative presumption. However, the day-to-day praxis of the workman reveals a scenario where such certainty is confronted with the theory of professional risk, generating in turn a possible loss of importance of the judgments of that Court as evidence in the final decision of labor proceedings. Hence the present study uses as a tool the qualitative and quantitative analysis of the jurisprudence of the Regional Labor Courts of the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 17th Regions published since 2010 to analyze the practical relationship between the Maritime Court and Labor Justice. As a result, it is exposed that this is a friendly relationship, in which both Courts respect the competence of others. However, in the end, it also emerges that these TRTs, even though they recognize the presumption of relative certainty of MC decisions, they do not relay on them because of their own technicalities.","PeriodicalId":356001,"journal":{"name":"Revista Juscontemporânea","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A REPERCUSSÃO DAS DECISÕES DO TRIBUNAL MARÍTIMO NOS TRIBUNAIS REGIONAIS DO TRABALHO DA 1ª, 2ª, 3ª e 17ª REGIÕES.\",\"authors\":\"Gustavo Magno Felipe Franco, André Panno Beirão\",\"doi\":\"10.30749/2674-9734.v1n1a260\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"After a long period of controversy and doubts about the role of the Maritime Court within our legal system, the doctrine has finally settled it as a proof of relative presumption. However, the day-to-day praxis of the workman reveals a scenario where such certainty is confronted with the theory of professional risk, generating in turn a possible loss of importance of the judgments of that Court as evidence in the final decision of labor proceedings. Hence the present study uses as a tool the qualitative and quantitative analysis of the jurisprudence of the Regional Labor Courts of the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 17th Regions published since 2010 to analyze the practical relationship between the Maritime Court and Labor Justice. As a result, it is exposed that this is a friendly relationship, in which both Courts respect the competence of others. However, in the end, it also emerges that these TRTs, even though they recognize the presumption of relative certainty of MC decisions, they do not relay on them because of their own technicalities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":356001,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Juscontemporânea\",\"volume\":\"62 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Juscontemporânea\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30749/2674-9734.v1n1a260\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Juscontemporânea","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30749/2674-9734.v1n1a260","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在经历了长期的争议和质疑之后,海事法院在我国法律体系中的作用最终被确立为相对推定的证明。然而,工人的日常实践揭示了这样一种情况,即这种确定性面临着职业风险理论,进而可能导致该法院的判决在劳动诉讼的最终裁决中作为证据的重要性丧失。因此,本研究以2010年以来发表的第一、第二、第三和第十七大区地区劳动法院判例为工具,以定性和定量分析海事法院与劳动司法之间的实际关系。结果暴露出这是一种友好关系,两个法院都尊重其他法院的能力。然而,最后,这些trt也出现了,尽管他们承认MC决策相对确定性的假设,但由于他们自己的技术细节,他们并不依赖于这些决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A REPERCUSSÃO DAS DECISÕES DO TRIBUNAL MARÍTIMO NOS TRIBUNAIS REGIONAIS DO TRABALHO DA 1ª, 2ª, 3ª e 17ª REGIÕES.
After a long period of controversy and doubts about the role of the Maritime Court within our legal system, the doctrine has finally settled it as a proof of relative presumption. However, the day-to-day praxis of the workman reveals a scenario where such certainty is confronted with the theory of professional risk, generating in turn a possible loss of importance of the judgments of that Court as evidence in the final decision of labor proceedings. Hence the present study uses as a tool the qualitative and quantitative analysis of the jurisprudence of the Regional Labor Courts of the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 17th Regions published since 2010 to analyze the practical relationship between the Maritime Court and Labor Justice. As a result, it is exposed that this is a friendly relationship, in which both Courts respect the competence of others. However, in the end, it also emerges that these TRTs, even though they recognize the presumption of relative certainty of MC decisions, they do not relay on them because of their own technicalities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A REPERCUSSÃO DAS DECISÕES DO TRIBUNAL MARÍTIMO NOS TRIBUNAIS REGIONAIS DO TRABALHO DA 1ª, 2ª, 3ª e 17ª REGIÕES. RESPONSABILIDADE PENAL E NOVAS TECNOLOGIAS: DESAFIO DO DIREITO NO SÉCULO XXI SOBRE O USO DE DRONES OU VANT's RECEPÇÃO, REPRISTINAÇÃO, DESCONSTITUCIONALIZAÇÃO E MUTAÇÃO CONSTITUCIONAL REFUGIADOS: QUESTÕES POLÍTICAS, JURÍDICAS E SOCIAIS REGIME DAS INCAPACIDADES E SUAS PRINCIPAIS MUDANÇAS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1