PBL中的同伴评估:性别重要吗?

A. Alves, F. Moreira, C. Leão
{"title":"PBL中的同伴评估:性别重要吗?","authors":"A. Alves, F. Moreira, C. Leão","doi":"10.1109/ICE.2017.8280039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This work attempts to identify gender differences on the peer assessment process within Project-Based Learning (PBL). It involved the study of perceptions on teamwork and grade results from a total of 330 students distributed by seven successive PBL editions of the Industrial Engineering and Management program. This program can be considered gender balanced, with 51% females and 49% males. The data analyzed focused on peer assessment results and on the final marks. The analysis revealed a positive correlation between the peer assessment grades and the final grades. A gender difference was found on peer grades as well as on final grades, favoring female. The individual merit was put forward in an attempt to justify the differences found, but conclusive evidence should be supported with further investigation.","PeriodicalId":421648,"journal":{"name":"2017 International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC)","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Peer assessment in PBL: Does gender matter?\",\"authors\":\"A. Alves, F. Moreira, C. Leão\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICE.2017.8280039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This work attempts to identify gender differences on the peer assessment process within Project-Based Learning (PBL). It involved the study of perceptions on teamwork and grade results from a total of 330 students distributed by seven successive PBL editions of the Industrial Engineering and Management program. This program can be considered gender balanced, with 51% females and 49% males. The data analyzed focused on peer assessment results and on the final marks. The analysis revealed a positive correlation between the peer assessment grades and the final grades. A gender difference was found on peer grades as well as on final grades, favoring female. The individual merit was put forward in an attempt to justify the differences found, but conclusive evidence should be supported with further investigation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":421648,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC)\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICE.2017.8280039\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICE.2017.8280039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本研究试图确定基于项目的学习(PBL)中同伴评估过程中的性别差异。该研究涉及对330名学生对团队合作的看法和成绩的研究,这些学生由工业工程与管理项目的七个连续PBL版本分发。这个项目可以被认为是性别平衡的,女性占51%,男性占49%。分析的数据集中在同行评估结果和最终分数上。分析表明,同侪评估成绩与最终成绩呈正相关关系。在同辈成绩和最终成绩上,性别差异都有利于女性。个别优点的提出是为了证明所发现的差异是合理的,但是结论性的证据应该得到进一步调查的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Peer assessment in PBL: Does gender matter?
This work attempts to identify gender differences on the peer assessment process within Project-Based Learning (PBL). It involved the study of perceptions on teamwork and grade results from a total of 330 students distributed by seven successive PBL editions of the Industrial Engineering and Management program. This program can be considered gender balanced, with 51% females and 49% males. The data analyzed focused on peer assessment results and on the final marks. The analysis revealed a positive correlation between the peer assessment grades and the final grades. A gender difference was found on peer grades as well as on final grades, favoring female. The individual merit was put forward in an attempt to justify the differences found, but conclusive evidence should be supported with further investigation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Urban-architect role in smart-city context literature review and case studies UX-FFE model: An experimentation of a new innovation process dedicated to a mature industrial company An examination of barriers to business model innovation Distributed software development of a cloud solution for collaborative manufacturing networks Testing and selecting mixed data type DEA scenarios with PCA post-processing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1