大学本科生和研究生教授体育活动水平的流行病学概况

Ana Paula Miranda, Tatiane Silva de Souza, Daniel Borges Pereira, Patrícia Colombo de Souza, A. Ribeiro
{"title":"大学本科生和研究生教授体育活动水平的流行病学概况","authors":"Ana Paula Miranda, Tatiane Silva de Souza, Daniel Borges Pereira, Patrícia Colombo de Souza, A. Ribeiro","doi":"10.56242/globalhealth;2021;1;2;63-67","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE: To verify the anthropometric, professional, pain and physical activity characteristics of university professors working in undergraduate and graduate courses: a pilot study. METHODS: Twenty teachers from a Higher Education Institution were evaluated, which were divided into two groups: group of undergraduate teachers (GPG, n = 10); group of postgraduate teachers (GPPG, n = 10). The assessment process was divided into: step 1, anthropometric and professional characterization; step 2, assessment of pain / discomfort using the Nordic questionnaire and step 3, assessment of the physical activity level, using the questionnaire: International Physical Activity Questionnaire-IPAC. RESULTS: The GPPG showed 90% for females, 70% of whom were married with overweight BMI. Teaching time was 10 years. The practice of physical activity was 30 to 60 minutes. Hypercholesterolemia was found in 90% of cases. Discomfort remained at 90% in the lower back. The IPAC was 20% sedentary. In GPG, on the other hand, 80% can be observed for females, 70% single with 90% overweight. The teaching time was 10 years. Physical activity was 10 to 15 minutes. The prevalent disease was hypercholesterolemia. Discomfort was 90% in the lumbar region and 80% in the neck and shoulder. The IPAC was 60% sedentary. CONCLUSION: It can be concluded that undergraduate teachers have more neck and shoulder pain, are overweight with a higher level of physical inactivity while graduate teachers have more lumbar pain with ideal weight and greater practice of physical activity.","PeriodicalId":285800,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Global Health","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Epidemiological profile of the level of physical activity of undergraduate and postgraduate university professors\",\"authors\":\"Ana Paula Miranda, Tatiane Silva de Souza, Daniel Borges Pereira, Patrícia Colombo de Souza, A. Ribeiro\",\"doi\":\"10.56242/globalhealth;2021;1;2;63-67\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVE: To verify the anthropometric, professional, pain and physical activity characteristics of university professors working in undergraduate and graduate courses: a pilot study. METHODS: Twenty teachers from a Higher Education Institution were evaluated, which were divided into two groups: group of undergraduate teachers (GPG, n = 10); group of postgraduate teachers (GPPG, n = 10). The assessment process was divided into: step 1, anthropometric and professional characterization; step 2, assessment of pain / discomfort using the Nordic questionnaire and step 3, assessment of the physical activity level, using the questionnaire: International Physical Activity Questionnaire-IPAC. RESULTS: The GPPG showed 90% for females, 70% of whom were married with overweight BMI. Teaching time was 10 years. The practice of physical activity was 30 to 60 minutes. Hypercholesterolemia was found in 90% of cases. Discomfort remained at 90% in the lower back. The IPAC was 20% sedentary. In GPG, on the other hand, 80% can be observed for females, 70% single with 90% overweight. The teaching time was 10 years. Physical activity was 10 to 15 minutes. The prevalent disease was hypercholesterolemia. Discomfort was 90% in the lumbar region and 80% in the neck and shoulder. The IPAC was 60% sedentary. CONCLUSION: It can be concluded that undergraduate teachers have more neck and shoulder pain, are overweight with a higher level of physical inactivity while graduate teachers have more lumbar pain with ideal weight and greater practice of physical activity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":285800,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brazilian Journal of Global Health\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brazilian Journal of Global Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56242/globalhealth;2021;1;2;63-67\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56242/globalhealth;2021;1;2;63-67","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:验证在本科和研究生课程工作的大学教授的人体测量、专业、疼痛和身体活动特征:一项试点研究。方法:对某高校20名教师进行评估,将其分为两组:本科教师组(GPG, n = 10);研究生教师组(GPPG, n = 10)。评估过程分为:第一步,人体测量和专业表征;第二步,使用北欧问卷评估疼痛/不适;第三步,使用国际身体活动问卷(ipac)评估身体活动水平。结果:GPPG显示90%为女性,其中70%为已婚,BMI超重。教学时间为10年。锻炼时间为30到60分钟。90%的病例出现高胆固醇血症。下背部的不适感保持在90%。IPAC中有20%是久坐的。另一方面,在GPG中,80%为雌性,70%为单身,90%为超重。教学时间为10年。体力活动是10到15分钟。流行的疾病是高胆固醇血症。腰椎不适占90%,颈肩不适占80%。IPAC中有60%是久坐不动的。结论:本科教师颈肩痛较多,体重超标,缺乏体育锻炼程度较高;研究生教师腰痛较多,体重理想,体育锻炼较多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Epidemiological profile of the level of physical activity of undergraduate and postgraduate university professors
OBJECTIVE: To verify the anthropometric, professional, pain and physical activity characteristics of university professors working in undergraduate and graduate courses: a pilot study. METHODS: Twenty teachers from a Higher Education Institution were evaluated, which were divided into two groups: group of undergraduate teachers (GPG, n = 10); group of postgraduate teachers (GPPG, n = 10). The assessment process was divided into: step 1, anthropometric and professional characterization; step 2, assessment of pain / discomfort using the Nordic questionnaire and step 3, assessment of the physical activity level, using the questionnaire: International Physical Activity Questionnaire-IPAC. RESULTS: The GPPG showed 90% for females, 70% of whom were married with overweight BMI. Teaching time was 10 years. The practice of physical activity was 30 to 60 minutes. Hypercholesterolemia was found in 90% of cases. Discomfort remained at 90% in the lower back. The IPAC was 20% sedentary. In GPG, on the other hand, 80% can be observed for females, 70% single with 90% overweight. The teaching time was 10 years. Physical activity was 10 to 15 minutes. The prevalent disease was hypercholesterolemia. Discomfort was 90% in the lumbar region and 80% in the neck and shoulder. The IPAC was 60% sedentary. CONCLUSION: It can be concluded that undergraduate teachers have more neck and shoulder pain, are overweight with a higher level of physical inactivity while graduate teachers have more lumbar pain with ideal weight and greater practice of physical activity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Uso de drogas entre estudantes universitários. Massive and early testing of SARS-COV2 in rural unions affiliated to FAESP-SENAR/SP. Diagnóstico molecular de agentes parasitários e coronavírus em gatos no Nordeste do Brasil. A one health approach to leishmaniasis in a slum: another piece of a global scenario. Conhecimento dos profissionais da equipe de Enfermagem sobre prevenção de infecção de corrente sanguínea relacionada a cateteres venosos em unidade de terapia intensiva pediátrica e neonatal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1